Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 63
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

go for electronic for the pure fact that it holds boost better, in cabin controll and you shouldn't get spikes compared to a bleed valve

although if you don't understand the installation diagram don't try it cos things could go backwards and cost you a lot more than its worth

cheers :action-smiley-069:

Personally wouldn't go for an Electronic boost controller as you can get a good bleed valve to hold boost well.

I would probably only go to an Electronic boost controller if I was running about 20psi + of boost, otherwise its just a waste of money.

There is a boost controller that holds boost very well, its TURBOTECH I think it was, big thread on the forums about it. Will post up the link when I find it.

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...OOST+CONTROLLER

There's a link to past experiences with boost controller, and some recommendations.

Thanks,

Abu

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...=$22+boost

Here is some info on that TURBOTECH boost controller, and its just $28.

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...+boost+$22

Original thread.

Edited by abu

My turbotech boost T worked fine, now have a Greddy profecB spec2 which is also fine (was a present). The advantages of the ebc is that I can change boost in the car without having to pop the bonnet :D I have my low setting as base boost (no % increase) but with wastegate shut till 8psi which makes it spool up a little quicker than normal. High setting is +25% and gate shut till 10psi. On really cold nights I tend to knock it back to the Low setting (as car is currently untuned). OR I can turn it off altogether :action-smiley-069:

i sed one. held well. for the boost i was running i couldn't justify spending $100 for a controller, let alone $300 or $400, when i could spend the difference on other bits to make it go faster.

Yep, I am the same. I dont want to spend $400 on an EBC to hold 13psi, when a $22 bleed valve will do it for me.

I have also used one, and it worked well. My cousin is using it now as I sold my old car, and I wil be getting another one once I get my cooler.

Thanks for all the advice guys.

Yeah i only really want to hit about 10-11psi on the stock turbo, nothing more for wear and tear issues. I don't wanna spend more than $100 if i can spend that or less on something reliable. TurboTech sounds pretty good at this point. Cheers Abu.

Any major issues in installing the bleed valve yourself? I'll check the DIY threads as well. What i wanted ideally was a controller that was adjustable inside the cabin, between stock and higher boost, with one of those rocket switches.

That an EBC right?

i was running the turbotech for years. i loved mine till i lost the bolt and spring and ball on the road somewhere... only then did i get a AVCR (older type)

on my dyno sheet on my sig you can see (just) the boost curve. its flat. i have had people who own workshops tell me that they have seen electronic boost controllerss not be able to hold as much boost as the turbotech.

I dont think you need a electronic boost controller at all. i got mine really cheap and i would have replaced it with another turbotech if it did not come up.

ohh and my car was running 25psi and 363 rwkw with the turbotech on a tial 38mm external wastegate.

Yep, I am the same. I dont want to spend $400 on an EBC to hold 13psi, when a $22 bleed valve will do it for me.

I have also used one, and it worked well. My cousin is using it now as I sold my old car, and I wil be getting another one once I get my cooler.

i can gaurantee a power increase 100% of the time with a properly setup EBC like a DSBC etc (i hate AVCR's they really show their age nowadays)..... over a turbotech bleed valve (actually any bleeder)

in some cases i have seen as much as 22rwkw in the mid range.... an EBC can react far quicker and hold the gate shut for longer which = more mid... especially while the turbotech is busy bleeding off.

i was running the turbotech for years. i loved mine till i lost the bolt and spring and ball on the road somewhere... only then did i get a AVCR (older type)

on my dyno sheet on my sig you can see (just) the boost curve. its flat. i have had people who own workshops tell me that they have seen electronic boost controllerss not be able to hold as much boost as the turbotech.

I dont think you need a electronic boost controller at all. i got mine really cheap and i would have replaced it with another turbotech if it did not come up.

ohh and my car was running 25psi and 363 rwkw with the turbotech on a tial 38mm external wastegate.

25psi, thats awesome with just a bleed valve!

I have seen people holding up to 18psi -19psi fairly well, but 25psi is truely amazing.

Its items like this that show up statements such as "you get what you pay for".

Edited by abu
But do i need an EBC for a stock turbo? Is it even worth it?

it doesn't really matter if its stock or not, its how it comes on boost and how it holds the boost

if your not wanting to mod a lot on your car just go the turbotech, enough people have vouched for it

but you'll end up wanting an EBC if you ever drive a car like yours with one it in, i know i did

But do i need an EBC for a stock turbo? Is it even worth it?

Na mate. A bleed valve will service you fine.

As Guilt-Toy said, he was running 25psi with no issues.

I am sure it will do what you want it to just fine.

Edited by abu

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hard to say, just pop the rocker covers off and have a look if you think it's cammed. You probably need to replace the valve cover gasket/half moons anyways.
    • From my youth: GTi-R clutch change is a massive pain. The gearboxes are fragile? But the car is super cool and I want one 😢 
    • Remember this is 1988 tech.
    • Driveline vibration is resolved. I ended up loosening all my engine mount and trans mount bolts, giving it a good shake then retightening everything and it's gone... Let's just say I was surprised that fixed it.  I've been happily driving it around again but unfortunately put zero time into my direct port/constant pressure WMI setup. I'm on vacation next week, so I'll try and finalize it then.  On a different note, I spent all week fuel/ignition mapping 2x 216L V16 engines. Turbo's were burning glycol and we swapped them out for larger units. We also had planned emissions testing on site, so I figured I'd be there the same week to use their instrumentation and massage any emissions issues out if needed. This was a first for me. Fuel management is similar in certain ways to automotive (i.e air density as load variable) but very different in others. It's all PLC based and AFR's are controlled by air and not fuel. They use a control valve between the turbo and air manifold to control pressure which in turn controls AFR's. Due to this, target AFR tables supplied by the OEM are in pressures and not mass which really through me off. They use air pressure vs fuel pressure tables. I also relied on an O2 concentration sensor the emissions team had in the exhaust. Ignition timing was also all over the place and we were losing a fair bit of power. They're now happily sitting at 16-40BTDC depending on load. We were making about 1600kw at 900rpm at 90% load. Engines were running a lot smoother as well.    
    • heh, aint no R32 ever meeting modern targa cage rules unless the driver is veeeery short OP, good luck with the sale, since its already in the land of freedom I'm sure you will find a good buyer.
×
×
  • Create New...