Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

ok so over the time ive had my car ive had it dynoed 3 times, the first time was at turbo tune, hadnt had the car long, only had a 3" catback exhaust, besides that bone stock, had a few missing issues, but by the time it was fixed i got 150rwkw. the next time was at boostworx, nothing really major to report there, and finally i went to get a remap which was done at turbo tune by the speed lab, at this time i had now got a very high flowing turbo back exhaust, FMIC, pod, Bosch 040 and most importantly i had upgraded to a RB25 turbo from the original rb20 turbo. i received a before and after print out, the before was actually running a base map so not a full comparison but gave me a good idea. from the mid 150rwkw's with just the base map in with the rb25 turbo, it went to 182rwkw which i was pretty happy with, but still didnt resolve the big issue i had with lag of the rb25 turbo, now a bit more lag was expected even though it would receive a 3" dump and decat along with the new turbo aswell as the tune, but the amount was still very annoying. so i thought id chuck all my dyno sheets together and compare them on one chart. the result was fairly rough but gave me an idea.

Green: First dyno, stock RB20 Turbo

Red: Third dyno, rb25 turbo, base map

Blue: Third dyno, rb25 turbo, full remap and tune

Left Power, Right torque

dynocomp2dl6.jpg

Left Power, Right pressure

dynocomp4ha1.jpg

now ever since the rb25 turbo has been installed there has been a rattle that comes from the wastegate that comes on when decelerating in gear and in general low revs. i sussed it out and found that when i pull up on it, it almost feels like it clicks into place and stops rattling, only problem is after the wastegate is opened and close again it goes back to the original position. now this leads me to think there is a leak and its not sealing properly at low revs, and this would explain a massive difference in lag.

whats everyones thoughts on this?

original dynos:

post-23281-1188400721_thumb.jpg

post-23281-1188400691_thumb.jpg

post-23281-1188400775_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/182907-rb20-dyno-comparisons/
Share on other sites

when the car is cool, get a good strong set of pliers and grip the actuator rod and try to pull it towards the dump pipe. Is it firm to really hard to move? does it wobble at all or does it feel loose?

if it all feels OK

to bring the boost on sooner try using a turbotech boost controller as the ball and spring mechanism will not net the actuator open at all until the desired boost is reached. it is an easy way to eliminate wastegate creep.

your power figure is really good. but you are right there seems to be a fair bit of lag. you have given a lot of useful info unlike a lot of the "what is wrong with my car" threads.

Also check to see if all the clamps leading to the actuator are tight and there are no splits or pinholes in the hose.

boost control looks good from the graph what are you using to control it?

Have you still got your RB20 actuator? it will suply more preload and may also help spool the turbo earlier.

worst case scenerio, you could pull the dump pipe and check the flap is seating properly.

Hope this helps :(

when the car is cool, get a good strong set of pliers and grip the actuator rod and try to pull it towards the dump pipe. Is it firm to really hard to move? does it wobble at all or does it feel loose?

if it all feels OK

to bring the boost on sooner try using a turbotech boost controller as the ball and spring mechanism will not net the actuator open at all until the desired boost is reached. it is an easy way to eliminate wastegate creep.

your power figure is really good. but you are right there seems to be a fair bit of lag. you have given a lot of useful info unlike a lot of the "what is wrong with my car" threads.

Also check to see if all the clamps leading to the actuator are tight and there are no splits or pinholes in the hose.

boost control looks good from the graph what are you using to control it?

Have you still got your RB20 actuator? it will suply more preload and may also help spool the turbo earlier.

worst case scenerio, you could pull the dump pipe and check the flap is seating properly.

Hope this helps :D

yeh it doesnt feel loose any other way but up and down. im using the cheap turbotech controller seen in that massive thread, it does do a good job, the first dyno doesnt use it but the other 2 do use the controller.

last time i checked there werent any obvious problems apart for the C clip on the end of the rod which was gone and i replaced that.

yes im still using the rb20 actuator, im starting to think i should try and source out a rb25 one just to try and see if i have the same issue.

im thinking of taking off the dump and checking it, but the amount of issues i had with putting the dump on (snapped off a bolt in the housing and ended up making one of the threads useless, so i sealed the dump with a silicone as well as the gasket) im not so keen to take it off in a hurry. when i had the turbo off it seemed like it was in pretty decent condition so id be kinda surprised if it was a fault with the turbo.

i would try another actuator, i dont seem to have any more lag than what i did with the rb20 turbo on my car, however i have a friend who's is laggier both have rb20 actuators.

i doubt your dump would cause this, you would hear the exhaust leak and wouldn't make that amount of power.

i would try another actuator, i dont seem to have any more lag than what i did with the rb20 turbo on my car, however i have a friend who's is laggier both have rb20 actuators.

i doubt your dump would cause this, you would hear the exhaust leak and wouldn't make that amount of power.

alright cheers. yeh im not saying its my dump causing it, its just i cbf taking it off to check as its going to be a bitch to get back on and seal.

Sounds like you have the same problem as i did with my turbo, the waste gate as not sealing on the turbine housing letting exhaust gas bypass the exhaust turbing through the leaking waste gate.

I could hear the waste gate "flap" rattling on the turbing housing when cruising around, all i did to fix it (a bit dodge) was bend the waste gate accuator arm outwards so that it was applying more force to the waste gate making it seal.

Boost response went from 15psi at around 3800rpm to around 3200rpm, just make sure you dont bread anything if your going to bend the waste gate accuator arm and you dont go too far so it fouls on anything.

Edited by Ceffy_SA

As CEFFY SA said, its probly the wastegate flap not sealing tight. i also had this problem, just grab the actuator rod with pliers and use a big screwdriver to put a bend in the middle, this will pull the gate flap shut tighter and fix the problem. Takes like 1 minute to do and makes the car feel so much better to come on boost.

I elongated the bolt up hole (top hole only required) on my rb20 actuator. Big screwdriver to push the actuator towards the front of the engine bay (away from the turbine housing) to apply as much preload as you wish then tighten up the actuator bolts.

Takes little adjusting but with no boost controller I had mine running ~15-16psi for quite a few years using that method. :rofl:

Also didn't drop boost. :)

It worked so well that I sold my Blitz SBC-iD III EBC which I now regret doing with my current setup. :)

Don't bend, that is the most rediculous thing you casn do. do as Cubes suggests and elongate the holes. Then just move the pod away from the turbo. You should need to pull the rod arm the width of it's hole to get it over the wastegate arm. It should be firm and hard to pull out.

Loosen the bolts slightly; connect the actuator arm to the wastegate.

Shove a big arsed screw driver inbetween the comp cover and actuator. Lever the actuator away from the turbo (actuator to the front of the car) and nip up the bolts.

Then drive carefully and see what boost your running, pull over slightly adjust and see again. :cheers:

I ended up marking the actuator rod where it enters the actuator for easier rough adjustment.

From memory mine required ~5mm preload for ~1bar.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Version 1 aluminium airbox is.......not acceptable No pics as I "didn't like the look.....alot" Even after all my "CAD", and measurements, the leg near the fusebox just didn't sit right as it ended up about 10mm long and made the angle of the dangle look wrong, the height was a little short as well, meh, I wasn't that confident that Version 1 was going to be an instant winner I might give Version 2 another go, there's plenty of aluminium at work, but, after having in on and off a few times, and laying in the old OEM airbox without the new pod filter and MAF, there may be an option to modify the OEM air box and still use the Autoexe front cover and filter.... maybe This >  Needs to fit in here, but using the panel, and not the pod, the MAF will need to fit in the airbox though> I'm thinking as the old OEM box and Autoexe cover that is sitting in the shed is just sitting around doing nothing, and they are relatively abundant and cheap to replace if I mess it up and need another, it may well fit with some modifications to how the Autoexe brackets mounts to the rad support, and some dremiling to move it get in there, should give me some more room for activities, as I don't want to move the MAF and affect the tune Sealing the hole it requires to stick it in the air box is simple, a tight fit and some pinch weld will seal it up tight  I am calling this a later problem though
    • and it ends up being already priced in as though you're just on 91RON without any ethanol. Car will lose a bit of economy as the short and long term fuel trims bring down the AFR back to stoich or whatever it is for cruise/idle for the engine.  
    • Oh, you are right. But, in Australia E10 is based on 91RON fuel and ends up being 94RON. Hence it being the cheaper option for economy cars. The more performance oriented cars go for the 98RON fuel that has no ethanol mixed in. The only step up we have left then at some petrol stations is E85.
    • There is a warning that "this thread is super old" but they ignore that anyway...
    • With 10% Ethanol, we're talking 2-3% fuel consumption difference. The emissions reductions and octane boost in my opinion far outweigh this almost non existent loss.    My tanks sitting at 80%. Luckily that should go down fast as I'm on vacation again for the next two weeks. 
×
×
  • Create New...