Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

ok so over the time ive had my car ive had it dynoed 3 times, the first time was at turbo tune, hadnt had the car long, only had a 3" catback exhaust, besides that bone stock, had a few missing issues, but by the time it was fixed i got 150rwkw. the next time was at boostworx, nothing really major to report there, and finally i went to get a remap which was done at turbo tune by the speed lab, at this time i had now got a very high flowing turbo back exhaust, FMIC, pod, Bosch 040 and most importantly i had upgraded to a RB25 turbo from the original rb20 turbo. i received a before and after print out, the before was actually running a base map so not a full comparison but gave me a good idea. from the mid 150rwkw's with just the base map in with the rb25 turbo, it went to 182rwkw which i was pretty happy with, but still didnt resolve the big issue i had with lag of the rb25 turbo, now a bit more lag was expected even though it would receive a 3" dump and decat along with the new turbo aswell as the tune, but the amount was still very annoying. so i thought id chuck all my dyno sheets together and compare them on one chart. the result was fairly rough but gave me an idea.

Green: First dyno, stock RB20 Turbo

Red: Third dyno, rb25 turbo, base map

Blue: Third dyno, rb25 turbo, full remap and tune

Left Power, Right torque

dynocomp2dl6.jpg

Left Power, Right pressure

dynocomp4ha1.jpg

now ever since the rb25 turbo has been installed there has been a rattle that comes from the wastegate that comes on when decelerating in gear and in general low revs. i sussed it out and found that when i pull up on it, it almost feels like it clicks into place and stops rattling, only problem is after the wastegate is opened and close again it goes back to the original position. now this leads me to think there is a leak and its not sealing properly at low revs, and this would explain a massive difference in lag.

whats everyones thoughts on this?

original dynos:

post-23281-1188400721_thumb.jpg

post-23281-1188400691_thumb.jpg

post-23281-1188400775_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/182907-rb20-dyno-comparisons/
Share on other sites

when the car is cool, get a good strong set of pliers and grip the actuator rod and try to pull it towards the dump pipe. Is it firm to really hard to move? does it wobble at all or does it feel loose?

if it all feels OK

to bring the boost on sooner try using a turbotech boost controller as the ball and spring mechanism will not net the actuator open at all until the desired boost is reached. it is an easy way to eliminate wastegate creep.

your power figure is really good. but you are right there seems to be a fair bit of lag. you have given a lot of useful info unlike a lot of the "what is wrong with my car" threads.

Also check to see if all the clamps leading to the actuator are tight and there are no splits or pinholes in the hose.

boost control looks good from the graph what are you using to control it?

Have you still got your RB20 actuator? it will suply more preload and may also help spool the turbo earlier.

worst case scenerio, you could pull the dump pipe and check the flap is seating properly.

Hope this helps :(

when the car is cool, get a good strong set of pliers and grip the actuator rod and try to pull it towards the dump pipe. Is it firm to really hard to move? does it wobble at all or does it feel loose?

if it all feels OK

to bring the boost on sooner try using a turbotech boost controller as the ball and spring mechanism will not net the actuator open at all until the desired boost is reached. it is an easy way to eliminate wastegate creep.

your power figure is really good. but you are right there seems to be a fair bit of lag. you have given a lot of useful info unlike a lot of the "what is wrong with my car" threads.

Also check to see if all the clamps leading to the actuator are tight and there are no splits or pinholes in the hose.

boost control looks good from the graph what are you using to control it?

Have you still got your RB20 actuator? it will suply more preload and may also help spool the turbo earlier.

worst case scenerio, you could pull the dump pipe and check the flap is seating properly.

Hope this helps :D

yeh it doesnt feel loose any other way but up and down. im using the cheap turbotech controller seen in that massive thread, it does do a good job, the first dyno doesnt use it but the other 2 do use the controller.

last time i checked there werent any obvious problems apart for the C clip on the end of the rod which was gone and i replaced that.

yes im still using the rb20 actuator, im starting to think i should try and source out a rb25 one just to try and see if i have the same issue.

im thinking of taking off the dump and checking it, but the amount of issues i had with putting the dump on (snapped off a bolt in the housing and ended up making one of the threads useless, so i sealed the dump with a silicone as well as the gasket) im not so keen to take it off in a hurry. when i had the turbo off it seemed like it was in pretty decent condition so id be kinda surprised if it was a fault with the turbo.

i would try another actuator, i dont seem to have any more lag than what i did with the rb20 turbo on my car, however i have a friend who's is laggier both have rb20 actuators.

i doubt your dump would cause this, you would hear the exhaust leak and wouldn't make that amount of power.

i would try another actuator, i dont seem to have any more lag than what i did with the rb20 turbo on my car, however i have a friend who's is laggier both have rb20 actuators.

i doubt your dump would cause this, you would hear the exhaust leak and wouldn't make that amount of power.

alright cheers. yeh im not saying its my dump causing it, its just i cbf taking it off to check as its going to be a bitch to get back on and seal.

Sounds like you have the same problem as i did with my turbo, the waste gate as not sealing on the turbine housing letting exhaust gas bypass the exhaust turbing through the leaking waste gate.

I could hear the waste gate "flap" rattling on the turbing housing when cruising around, all i did to fix it (a bit dodge) was bend the waste gate accuator arm outwards so that it was applying more force to the waste gate making it seal.

Boost response went from 15psi at around 3800rpm to around 3200rpm, just make sure you dont bread anything if your going to bend the waste gate accuator arm and you dont go too far so it fouls on anything.

Edited by Ceffy_SA

As CEFFY SA said, its probly the wastegate flap not sealing tight. i also had this problem, just grab the actuator rod with pliers and use a big screwdriver to put a bend in the middle, this will pull the gate flap shut tighter and fix the problem. Takes like 1 minute to do and makes the car feel so much better to come on boost.

I elongated the bolt up hole (top hole only required) on my rb20 actuator. Big screwdriver to push the actuator towards the front of the engine bay (away from the turbine housing) to apply as much preload as you wish then tighten up the actuator bolts.

Takes little adjusting but with no boost controller I had mine running ~15-16psi for quite a few years using that method. :rofl:

Also didn't drop boost. :)

It worked so well that I sold my Blitz SBC-iD III EBC which I now regret doing with my current setup. :)

Don't bend, that is the most rediculous thing you casn do. do as Cubes suggests and elongate the holes. Then just move the pod away from the turbo. You should need to pull the rod arm the width of it's hole to get it over the wastegate arm. It should be firm and hard to pull out.

Loosen the bolts slightly; connect the actuator arm to the wastegate.

Shove a big arsed screw driver inbetween the comp cover and actuator. Lever the actuator away from the turbo (actuator to the front of the car) and nip up the bolts.

Then drive carefully and see what boost your running, pull over slightly adjust and see again. :cheers:

I ended up marking the actuator rod where it enters the actuator for easier rough adjustment.

From memory mine required ~5mm preload for ~1bar.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...