Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey PRANK,

you said u were installing the HKs type1, ..im gonna be doing that 2moro..

i heard that it removes the 180 speed limit... becuase u gotta hook the brown and blue wires into the ECU, which are speed and rpm..

so it loops the speedo thru the TT and removes the 180 limit..

any truth in this???

mc

:shake:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/1840-brant/page/3/#findComment-36646
Share on other sites

  • Replies 57
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

saiyan : thast what i asked..i believe it does..

firends of mine say they have gone over 180..and are using the type 1..

but they are running different that stock wheels..

and didnt push more than 190..

so i dunno

im a bit warey of trying it out (over 180) after i get my type1 fitted..

mc

:shake:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/1840-brant/page/3/#findComment-37229
Share on other sites

I've made my appointment for BRANT installation this Saturday 3rd August 9AM. If anyone else is interested, there will be a $60 discount for a AA02A or a $100 discount for a nemesis alarm if you install one at the same time.

In North Sydney area. Msg me ASAP or email: [email protected]

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/1840-brant/page/3/#findComment-37384
Share on other sites

Nemesis 2 wont be available until late in the year - it will have full

onboard monitored GPS tracking and will cost approx $ 2600.Nemesis 1 is

available now and will be upgradeable to the tracking when it is

available. Nemesis 1 costs $ 990.

Nemesis 1 is $ 990 fully fitted. Only options are power window lifter

modules which are $ 95 fitted for 2 windows or $125 fitted for 4

windows.

At this stage we are still tossing up between three carriers for our

tracking but wld estimate that the tracking would cost around $1700 to

$1900 if we go fully monitored 24/7 or around $ 1200 if self monitored

via mobile phone.

As stated we have no firm date yet on Nemesis 2. Nemesis 1 is also

compatible with any other tracking system provided the Nemesis is fitted

first ( as tracking systems wld use Nemesis remote to operate their

system)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/1840-brant/page/3/#findComment-38481
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Guest | hype^ |
Originally posted by brendanf

Nemesis 1 is $ 990 fully fitted. Only options are power window lifter

modules which are $ 95 fitted for 2 windows or $125 fitted for 4

windows.

WTF!!! i just got a quote for the window lifting with a AA02A today and they said itll be 160$ extra!!

wats up with that!!???

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/1840-brant/page/3/#findComment-46482
Share on other sites

I have had a AA02 fitted to my car (since removed) and the only thing I could complain about is not so much the "range", but the time taken to arm and disarm etc.

I now have a quik trak installed and very shortly this too will be removed and replaced with an even better system in about a month.

I am not saying either of these systems are bad, or failed in anyway - but I take vehicle security quite seriously and get to test out and try new systems when they are released and updated etc,

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/1840-brant/page/3/#findComment-47847
Share on other sites

I will be selling the Quik Trak when the other system gets installed.

I have alreay been offered $750 for it, so I'll see what happens..

Can't say too much - but it will be Sattelite based, and not Tower based like QT. (nOt that that is a problem for me in the sydney Metro area, I just want to get a sattelite system and this new model will be available soon ( final testing phase)

If this new system is as good as they say - I will try and arrange for some special skylinesaustralia and performance forums members prices etc. - Stay Turned..

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/1840-brant/page/3/#findComment-49533
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah i found that alot of parts can be wrong or "very" hard to get the real right one. I already bought some brakes years ago on me "old" GT calipers and they were wrong too 😄  I told them too. Even send them pictures...but they said "EBC catalogue has them on my car... So i dont know what their answer will be. I call monday them and let them know that they are really not on my car. If they were they would be already on a car...
    • Welcome to Skyline ownership. Yes, it is entirely possible parts websites get things wrong. There's a whole world of inaccuracies out there when it comes to R34 stuff (and probably 33 and 32). Lots of things that are 'just bolt on, entirely interchangable' aren't. Even between S1 and S2 R34's. Yes they have a GTT item supposedly being 296mm. This is incorrect. I would call whoever you got them from and return them and let them know the GTT actually uses 310mm rotors. Depending on where you got them from your experience and success will obviously vary.
    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
×
×
  • Create New...