Jump to content
SAU Community

Brant


[Ken]
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 57
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Guest | hype^ |

k i dont mean to put a damper on the thread but do u guys really think its wise to post what alarm you have or are getting on a open forum?? :D

and especially how to bypass them, not mentioning any names .. (*cought urmine* :lol: )

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by soopamarcus

and you guys who fitted the AA02...

how much did it cost all up?

$595...which including getting a motor put in the drivers door. They did it on-site at my work :D
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm in the North and need to get a Brant alarm - My car comes into Aus in 2 weeks, then has to be complianced - So not sure if the timing is right !

BF

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey fellas i rang brant up and they told me that none of their alarms work in tandem with ANY turbo timers..

is this true? or has the guy bullshytted me??

ive got aHKS type 1..

also ppl that i spoken to..said that using a turbo timer..u gotta see how much the engine "shudders" when the timer turns off the car...cuz the engine shudder can cuase the "armed alarm" to be triggered and go off...

just a though

mc

:shake:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Err~!! take out my TT?? i havent even put it in yet..hehe

yeah prank the type1 has a 0-400 etc etc..but you wont be able to use the TT function..

DOes anyone know of any INSURANCE APPROVED alarms on the market that support turbo timer functions? for say :

under $600

2point immonbilisation.

black wiring

separate brain and siren?

pls help

mc:shake:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by soopamarcus

WTF? are u kidding me? the tech guy at brant said they couldnt get it to work with and TT...

what turbo timer does ur friend have? and also which model brant does he have fitted?!~

mc:shake:

not sure - i think its an older model brant system...

i'll find out, but i know him well and i have seen it all work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest | hype^ |

yeh i got told the same deal with boomerang ..

i wasnt too impressed..

made me thing twice about whether to get it or not..

but there must be some way areound it.. :uh-huh:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I got a TT and a Brant.

The deal is for some legal reason turbo timmers ain't legal so brant doesn't want anything to do with em.

What my car does is

You can look the doors and let the turbo timmer run then 30sec after the car turns off the imobiliser turns on but the alarm will not turn on unless you hit the button agian.

So it sorta works...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Brant AA02 and Nemesis both work with turbo timers as I know a two people on this forum with this setup working fine.

Turbo timers are illegal though and if your insurance company finds you have one i have heaard they may not payout if your car gets flogged. Dunno how they can do this though....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share




  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all, I need to get this HKS SLD attached to my stock ECU because I've now got the German autobahn and faster European circuits to contend with.  The car is a manual 2dr ER34 with an AT ECU and I've realised the AT ECU has two pins for speed sensor signals: Pin 29: Vehicle speed sensor signal (Vehicle speed sensor 2) Pin *58: Output shaft rotation sensor signal (Vehicle speed sensor 1) - *RB25DET A/T model only Before I go butchering this harness, is anyone sure of which pin is the correct one for signal adjustment? The attached document from HKS indicates pin 29 but I found this situation mentioned in the following thread on a different forum (R34 GTT Auto Trans Speed Cut Problem | Zerotohundred) mentioning pin 58 needing to be altered by member zephuros, albeit it seems to be for an RSM-GP and the info appears to be old.  R34_All_Workshop_Manual-pages-2.pdf R34_All_Workshop_Manual-pages-3.pdf R34_All_Workshop_Manual-pages-1.pdf HKS SLD Vehicle Pin out P59-P70 ER34-pages.pdf
    • Embrace the freedom of casual encounters on the best dating app in town! Verified Maidens Superlative Сasual Dating
    • Slimline sub on the rear parcel shelf is doable. Pioneer TS-WX140DA is only 70mm high.   
    • People like Johnny Dose Bro might be laughing at my post because I accidentally added 100mm to my numbers. 350-355 is indeed the lower limit. 450 is off-road Skyline spec.
    • What is the "compromise" that you think will happen? Are you thinking that something will get damaged? The only things you have to be concerned about with spherical jointed suspension arms are; Arguments with the constabulary wrt their legality (they are likely to be illegal for road use without an engineering certificatation, and that may not be possible to obtain). A lot more NVH transmitted through to the passengers (which is hardly a concern for those with a preference for good handling, anyway). Greatly increased inspection and maintenance requirements (see above points, both).   It is extremely necessary to ask what car you are talking about. Your discussion on strut tops, for example, would be completely wrong for an R chassis, but be correct for an S chassis. R32s have specific problems that R33/4 do not have. Etc. I have hardened rubber bushes on upper rear control arms and traction rods. Adjustable length so as to be able to set both camber and bump steer. You cannot contemplate doing just the control arms and not the traction arms. And whatever bushing you have in one you should have in the other so that they have similar characteristics. Otherwise you can get increased oddness of behaviour as one bushing flexes and the other doesn't, changing the alignment between them. I have stock lower rear arms with urethane bushes. I may make changes here, these are are driven by the R32's geometry problems, so I won't discuss them here unless it proves necessary. I have spherical joints in the front caster rods. I have experienced absolutely no negatives and only positives from doing so. They are massively better than any other option. I have sphericals in the FUCAs, but this is driven largely by the (again) R32 specific problems with the motion of those arms. I just have to deal with the increased maintenance required. Given how much better the front end behaves with the sphericals in there.....I'd probably be tempted to go away from my preference (which is not to have sphericals on a road car, for 2 of the 3 reasons in the bulleted list above), just to gain those improvements. And so my preference for not using sphericals (in general) on a road car should be obvious. I use them judiciously, though, as required to solve particular problems.
×
×
  • Create New...