Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

yeah they do the job. it's reasonable i guess, i got quoted 500 including labour, but apparently my mate knows some place where they do it (with kingsprings too) for 300. so i reckon just look around if you wanna save as much as possible

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/184621-lowering-my-sky/#findComment-3341668
Share on other sites

you can go lower with super super low or ultra low king springs, some people say they arnt as nicer ride as the red springs (pedders), more roll, cant see that being the case though... but i dont see why they wouldnt do the job. for a stiffer ride you would have to get tighter shocks or shorter. i have 20inch wheels and lowered, going down some highways with heavy dips in the road cause the front wheels to touch the top plastics in the guard... not a real worrie.

what size are your wheels?

are you looking at performance like handling or just to look the part?

also if you have any intetion on changing your wheels best get the wheels first.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/184621-lowering-my-sky/#findComment-3343058
Share on other sites

i just want it to look real low and performance,,,handling isntso important to me.,.also i have 17inch rims im not going to change them.

do they still sell ultra lows? and are they all the same price (ultra/super/normal lows)??

can i get the back lower then the front also?

Edited by jet629
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/184621-lowering-my-sky/#findComment-3343356
Share on other sites

i don't get how u want it to look real low and have performance but not worry about handling.... handling=peformance.... at the on of the day if ur going that low you need to replace the shocks to handle being that low.... plue it's ideal to have the drive shafts shortened if going really low.... and you should never lower a skyline more in the back than the front

Edited by redevil
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/184621-lowering-my-sky/#findComment-3343416
Share on other sites

i don't get how u want it to look real low and have performance but not worry about handling.... handling=peformance.... at the on of the day if ur going that low you need to replace the shocks to handle being that low.... plue it's ideal to have the drive shafts shortened if going really low.... and you should never lower a skyline more in the back than the front

why is it bad to have the back lower then the front?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/184621-lowering-my-sky/#findComment-3344673
Share on other sites

i think everyone may be confused a little... or me :blink: , i think he means he wants to have the car looking level, not lower in the back than the front, the guards in the back are different to the front, the front guards are bigger to accomidate turning of the front wheels... so naturally when the car is lowered to level, the back will look lower because the tires/mags will go up inside the guard...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/184621-lowering-my-sky/#findComment-3349956
Share on other sites

Changing springs isn't all that hard. You can do it all yourself in about 2hours tops if you know what you're doing. There are quite a few tutorials on how to do the change.

I wouldn't recommend changing the springs and leaving the standard shocks in there. Your ride is going to feel and ride like shit.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/184621-lowering-my-sky/#findComment-3350806
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Meh, I think we're well into a new era of 90s JDM car. The days when spare engines and parts were cheap and plentiful are long gone. Therefore the YOLO approach is now massively difficult to justify, use and maintain. One should start to ponder whether an 800HP build is really justified, using stock parts. My thoughts? If you like/love the car and want to keep it and don't want to ruin yet another one, then be discrete about how much you ask from the stock parts. A 5 or 600 HP build is still a very fast car. If you want to go silly, have to have the 1000HP territory, then just drop all your cash, buy billet everything (or PRP cast block, etc etc) and use a bigger/more modern gearbag, and put a massive retrofit diff and axles into it. If you ruin any of those things then you're either ham fisted and deserve it, or you're pushing waaaay too far for the stock stuff anyway. The (presumably) young guys who are buying 30-35 year old busted arse Jap refugees and thinking they can live the life that was lived by others 20 years ago are deluded. Expectations need to be adjusted somewhat.
    • Just don’t be silly enough to think it’ll never happen either 
    • I take it that you bought the centre to suit the GTR axles? As in there was a plan, not just somehow lucky that it worked? It all looks excellent, by the way.
    • New engine block time. Up to you whether you want to keep going down this road with this project. Unfortunately a lot of these cars are like this. The road to getting these cars into decent shape is long and not fun for reasons that you're discovering. 
    • Essay time. First things first, an RB running stock turbo and boost levels shouldn't get so bad as to stall from reversion if the recirc valve has been deleted. Should get a little fluffy and annoying, but in my experience, not so bad as to stall. Of course, every car is a bit different, so it remains possible that stalling will happen. So, running with no recirc valve is somewhat of an option, for otherwise stock stuff. Atmo BOVs cause all sorts of shit, even on an otherwise stock setup. Only gets worse the higher the boost and the bigger the turbo. At that point you really need to go for a different ECU and no AFM. Rebuilding the stock recirc valve configuration is not hard. You just need a stock or aftermarket BOV with the appropriate adapter for the 2 bolt flange on the back of the J pipe, and to get/make an appropriate ~1" pipe to get the air back to the turbo inlet, and to possibly modify the inlet (if it is not stock) to take the recirc pipe back in. Not hard. Just takes some cutting and welding. Putting an R35 type AFM into the car anywhere is not as simple as just buying the AFM and throwing it in. You will also need to buy the appropriate boss that will then need to be welded onto the pipe where you're installing it. You can clearly see why by looking at the photo posted above. They are not a "simple" swap for a stocker. You can't put on in place of the stock AFM. You can put one in place of the stock AFM, if you get the mounting boss and weld it to some pipe and otherwise make that pipe piece work like the stock AFM housing. Or you can buy such an adapter, either complete with the 4 bolt flange for the air box, or without, for varying degrees of work needed to then make it fit your stock airbox or some pod filter or whatever you have going on. Oh, and the R35 AFM is not plug and play. The wiring is different, but changing that is trivial. The plug is also different so you either end up repinning the original wires onto the new plug, or you just use a short adapter. If you weld a boss to the cold side pipe, the cold side pipe really wants to be 3", otherwise the scaling on the meter can get a bit weird, but whatever the pipe size, it's not as easy as just using the (fully documented in the Nistune doco) simple method for choosing R35 AFM in X" pipe size in the software, because the scaling will already be a bit different. Anyway, all of this has been comprehensively worked through on the Nistune forums, so there is full knowledge available. I would use a Link/Haltech before I would bother putting an AFM into a cold side pipe. That's a lot of effort for a bodge. Nistune is great, can work well even at fairly high power levels, but you are stuck with the limitations of it being the stock ECU, which includes needing to use an AFM, which is not always convenient for every set of modifications. You have to have a think about what you already have, what you want to have, and decide early if you'd be better off jumping ship to an aftermarket ECU. This so you don't waste time and money doing things 2 or 3 times. Never heard of ECUmaster. Sounds like a backyard operation. If there are good tuners for it where you are, and it is a solid product, then it will be fine. We're only talking about an R engine here. Back in the day they all ran on crude nasty early 90s ECUs and they were fine. You don't need a rocket surgeon's ECU to run one.
×
×
  • Create New...