Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 50
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Definately no chromies vic! lol, and very content with the bose sound at the moment, just upgrading the 6.5" subs on the parcel shelf as they have shitthemselves, and going to upgrade the HU to an audi RNS-E nav, dvd, tv, mp3 etc, very snazzy unit!

the engine is soo tidy, the turbos are down there somewhere i sware!

N1GTR - thanks mate, chip soon, had the trial program on her now i want it!!

best thing about this S4 is all the RS4 goodies bolt up to it! turbos, coolers the lot.... hello stage 3

GoldZilla - its pretty smooth, bit soft ish at low speeds but thats good on sydney roads i guess!

Joeyz

V6 2.7L Induction Twin Turbo intercooled

Power 195kW @ 5800rpm

Torque 400Nm @ 1850rpm-3600rpm

Acceleration 0-100Km/h 5.7 secs

Kerb Weight 1615kg

Fuel Consumption Urban 11.5L/100km

Fuel Consumption Extra Urban 6.6L/100km

Drive Four Wheel Drive

Transmission 6sp Manual

Wink - very sleeper, imports dont know what they have been chopped by and cops dont even bother looking!

Sanger - this car is much preferred over the skyline, but the bouncing boob scenery isnt as good!... and yeah ive got the ski port, dont know what i will do with it just yet...?

yeah but it DEFINATELY dosent feel like it, feels 1400kg max! and very throwable...

FYI

The APR 1.0 Bar performance chip for the 2.7T is good for 307 horsepower (229Kw) and 366 ft. lbs. (496Nm) of torque.

Big Upgrade!

yeah but it DEFINATELY dosent feel like it, feels 1400kg max! and very throwable...

FYI

The APR 1.0 Bar performance chip for the 2.7T is good for 307 horsepower (229Kw) and 366 ft. lbs. (496Nm) of torque.

Big Upgrade!

Yeah a mate of mine got the A4 turbo quattro when they were released (the 2004 model i think, not sure) and it felt light as, but was fkn heavy on the scales

Thats some good power for a sleeper car :D

Punctuation my friend...

It's the difference between:

1. I had to help my uncle jack off a horse.

and

2. I had to help my uncle jack, off a horse.

Point taken, must remember not to type while also doing 5 other things at once while at work, must also remember never to put my surfboard in my girlfriend again!!!!!!

Ok im getting the Haysey plates remade....

im thinking either white on blue (its a very similar blue to the car so will look ok)

or silver on black...

opinions?

Choose pink to reflect your new found metrosexuality

EDIT: Rofl 2 jokes about ed being metro in a minute.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Welcome to !
    • As I've said elsewhere, I am using the stock intercooler piping path in the engine bay, and a return flow cooler, and making ~250 rwkW (without any effort put into trying to turn it up past there just yet) and expect to be able to make some more, and frankly, I would be perfectly happy with 260-270rwKW. This is peak road Skyline usability territory. You go past there and, sure, the car will snap necks more when it's on boost, but it will also break shit all the time, cost a (even larger) fortune in tyres, etc etc. Anyway, I also do not like the over-the-fan pipe path, and you don't have to do it.
    • I see, honestly I’m not too fussed about the looks. The only reason to go plenum is to make the piping easier instead of the classic over the rad etc. 
    • Not easy to quantify wrt something like how many fractions of a second slower it would be over 0-100. But given that a 250-300rwkW car is able to do that launch sprint in 5-6 sec (and faster with appropriate tyres, and surface)..... giving up as much as a second would feel like torture. A ~450HP capable turbo is not going to make lots of boost in the 2000-3000 rpm range. So, whilst with some boost on hand it will be faster accelerating in that rev range than your engine currently is NA, it will not feel like a fast car until the boost is solidly in. You know what your car feels like right now when you open it up at 2000rpm. if you've ever been in an actual fast car, you will appreciate that the NARB25 is.... not exciting. Well, add some boost and it will be better. But shorten the intake runners and it might not be better at all. It might come out better, but it could end up feeling the same. For me, it's not the 0-X km/h sprints that matter. It is easy to fry the tyres with anything over 200 rwkW. You can't use all the power available in 1st and 2nd anyway, you have to modulate the throttle. What matters is how the car reacts when you're driving in traffic in 4th or 5th and have maybe 2000 rpm on board, and you want/need to add some speed quickly, and don't have time for the downshift. It won't make boost, it will be all NA (at the speeds we're talking about - remember how fast you're going at 2000 in 4th! and don't plan on breaking the limit by too much.) So giving away NA torque is not what I would consider practical for a street car. And retaining that NA torque builds boost faster which makes the car faster. The flashy plenum is not actually better, unless you're looking at a track car where you can keep it on the boil all the time.  
    • So how much difference does it make you think? Like 1 second in the 0-100?  I was have smaller turbo so hopefully that spools quick GTX2871.  currently it’s NA so you can imagine pretty slow, but I do want fast accusation a little as there’s not many places I’ll be driving where I go over 80 even near me. So 0-60 and 0-80 targets   
×
×
  • Create New...