Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Car will have to be returned to COMPLETLEY stock.

430hp indicates new turbo(s), fuel system, exhaust, FMIC, engine build, Management/ECU etc.... all have to go back to standard.

Compliance - $5K plus getting all the stock shit.

All the freight charges/import taxes/duties etc.

be looking @ $20K - $25K after all that +tyres/Inland transport/rego etc.....

Cheaper and easier to buy one here. :blink:

so how is your car Jess only minor problems i hope

Did a CV joint Thursday night coming home from work :(

So couldn't put on in in time to do the trip..

Took the proton instead but found out the shocks are dead in it...so didnt make it a fun journey 800km on the Highways :D

Only made it to Melbourne...and decided to drive back home :blink:

I will be over in a few weeks for a weekend so will catch up then!!

Wonder if some of your guys would be interested in entering DECA in May at Shepparton??

Cheaper and easier to buy one here. :blink:

All that shit still has to be done. IF you can find one for $6-7K (which is going to be a tall order, theey're still 10K there....), still going to be $15K by the time you get it just READY for rego. add in rego/tyres/on roads/inland transport etc and you still nearly on $20K. And you're starting off with a stock car.

Buy one here already modded and ready to rock and save the time/hassle/headf**ks and the 3 month wait. If you buy one from interstate still cheaper than bringing one of your own over....

Edited by R31 drift pig

Sweet! Heard good things about those turbo's on 20's.... f**king hard to get hold of though. I know where there's a complete RB20 kit, but it's $2K or something stupid, So I went with a trust turbo.

You changine injectors/AFM/ECU at all?

Id add a Z32 into the equation and shoot for 220 - 230. Those turbo's are capable of 250...... and reportedly VERY responsive on a 20..... sounds like it's gonna be a stomper setup though.

Im basically running a similar setup with my TD0620G 8cm (Walbro (soon to be 044 and 2.5ltr surge tank)/FMIC/exhaust/DMAX manifold/GTR injectors/Z32 AFM/Boostworx Remap/RB25 box), and shaun tuned a similar setup on a R32, 241kw's on 16 psi, full 16 psi By 4000rpm. Ill be running 1.2/1.3 bar and a 8500rpm limiter.... Hoping for a solid 250.

Edited by R31 drift pig
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...