Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

check this thing out and their whole website. Want a 34R NUR with 18km on it?

http://www.zeleperformance.com/vehicle/r34...registered.html

I was at Zele in yokohama 2 weeks ago and had a look at it in the flesh!! ..... heres a few snaps.... 34s everywhere!

post-27804-1254362999_thumb.jpg

post-27804-1254363059_thumb.jpg

post-27804-1254363095_thumb.jpg

post-27804-1254363138_thumb.jpg

post-27804-1254363186_thumb.jpg

post-27804-1254363275_thumb.jpg

post-27804-1254363322_thumb.jpg

post-27804-1254363369_thumb.jpg

Should had gave me a msg on Facebook! I would had come out!

I hardly ever use facebook man, otherwise I would have haha.

Another time,

Dave bring on the mid week runs ftw I had a ball last night it was great.

Jarrad - some advice if you are looking for a R32 GTR. These cars are all pretty old now and if I were you I'd be looking for the following items (unless you want a standard one).

1. Sorted the oil pickup problem. I would look for a larger oil pump & a larger sump &/or baffle kit.

2. A R33 GTR long nose crank (or with a collar).

3. New turbos with steel wheels.

4. A rebuilt engine with forged internals - mainly pistons, piston rings & conrod bolts. The standard conrods are fine for up to 400rwkW.

BTW if you want 18x10" rims then you also need to consider what size & look of tyres you want. 275/35/18 will need the guards to be rolled. 255/35/18 will give you a stretched look. I personally wouldn't get anything wider than 9.5" (I have 18x10 +20 BBS LM rims on mine) as 10" rims also prevent you going to full lock when turning.

I say all this coming from experience (i have owned 2x R32 GTRs since March 2004) and the experience of many (but not all) others. It may cost you more $ to get a car with these mods but I promise this will be less than the dollars, time & heartache when one of the engine or turbos blow.

balls. id love to come for a run, but with the new pump in im not gonna be "driving" it until i get it dyno'd to check the afr's...

... and ive got a going away party that i "have" to make an appearance at...

... on the plus side, ive sold my spare wing... and the front end of the 200 is back together. :thumbsup:

lol, pretty well. its come a fair way from the stocker it was when i bought it...

... now i just need a pfc or something and a z32... hmmm...

Edited by scandyflick
hahahaah yeah i need a sump baffle :thumbsup: but if not sitting at high rpm all the time not too much of a drama

who wants to go for a cruise tonight?? ive got today/ tomorrow off.

I may be keen later on tonight if your still keen Jenkies?

HMMZ i might have to give it a miss actually guys, been playing pretty sht b ball lately so i better get my ass to training. would say can cruise after training but its pretty dodgy car park there and ill stink up the gtr :)

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
×
×
  • Create New...