Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

high revs are for small displacement honda's... see if you can make more torque out of the RB25 down low in the RPM.

But if you want to rev higher you'll need to remove the rev limiter on the ECU using either a cut defender or a modded ECU. You'll also have to make sure your engine and cooling can support higher revs.

  scathing said:
Don't those hardcore GT-R motors spin to 11,000RPM?

only momentarily till their passenger side floorwell comes apart at the welds, flies free and chops someone's head off.

  funkymonkey said:
only momentarily till their passenger side floorwell comes apart at the welds, flies free and chops someone's head off.

Surely you'd be yelling "shut up" first, and slamming your laptop lid down.

  scathing said:
Surely you'd be yelling "shut up" first, and slamming your laptop lid down.

The thought did cross my mind when it started flashing "danger to manifold".

  bryyy said:
You may want to look at getting more power rather than more revs.

Whats the point in revving if your not making power?

Have to agree with this, no point having a car thats revving it's nuts off, all that you end up doing is making more noise and no extra power.

Here's a dyno chart of my car to prove that more revs don't equall more power. The dyno was done in 3rd gear and let go untill red line. Btw my car is running an after market ECU (GTS Link), I've kept red line at the factory limit as my car stops making power at around 6200rpm.

117rwkwR33.jpg

If you are wanting more top end power and get the engine reving harder you will need to open it up and replace the standard cams with something a little bigger, the down side of this it gets very expensive very quickly and you will also need to replace the stock ECU.

Edited by skyla

a lil off topic, but does anyone know when the speed cut kicks in, in a r33 gtst series 2? the car has a piggy back SAFC, would that make a difference? cheers

i know this is the NA section, but shouldnt make a difference right...

  ginger said:
Do i need to change valve springs at all, or do anything like that??

nah, valve bounce is ideal.

on a more serious note you'd want to do some block and head work to see revs reliably

  inthisglass said:
Eug, when you say chip it, what chip in particular?

cheers

karl

i prefer smith's thins.

you'd be looking at an aftermarket ecu or something like dr. drift (sam's) chips

  funkymonkey said:
The thought did cross my mind when it started flashing "danger to manifold".

lol

  ztuned said:
a lil off topic, but does anyone know when the speed cut kicks in, in a r33 gtst series 2? the car has a piggy back SAFC, would that make a difference? cheers

i know this is the NA section, but shouldnt make a difference right...

  funkymonkey said:
afaik its just a fuel and ignition cut at over 180km/h
  ztuned said:
if u were referring to my post...i dun quite understand lol

he was referring to yours.

basically speed cut at 180km/hr is a fuel & ignition cut. by having an SAFC it 'should' have removed it, check your manual. i know my SAFC2 has removed it.

Im with all of the above..

Learn to abuse the engine with the power it has now.

I do alot of togue style driving. I find that alot of the poke is ~4.5K and above (25DE VCT). Keep it above that when exiting the corner and you'll find the car is accutally quite quick! Even Id call it decently quick! ME! Who always bitches about how slow and heavy my car is!

I think the ideal thing you want that will suite all the criteria, a lightened flywheel. It will make the engine rev out quicker, you wont gain any power, perhaps a minisqule amount of torque. But the engine will be a whole much more user friendly!

Over that, the usual:

Port and polish

Cams (you will need to retune/chip, NA Z32 is a cheap alurnative)

and once cams are dont.. headers and zoers.. or the other way around is better..

BUT then you need block work.. rods, rod bolts.. and while your there.. shave.. and that all time and $$$ lots of $$$ and if you dont know how to do it.. some deadshit putting his paws all over the car.. and you dont know...

then with more power..

suspention - too much $$

brakes - *SPEW!*

oh fcuk it!.. the modification bussiness licks balls..

just be happy with what you have :) .. or buy an Elise

Edited by GTS4WD
  bryyy said:
Whats the point in revving if your not making power?

As long as you're not losing a great deal of power, a higher cutout gives you a bit more rev range to play with. Even if the power curve falls away a little, it can still have advantages.

I'll put it this way. My generation of VQ35DE has a stock redline of 6600RPM. I've bumped it up to 7200RPM. When me and a mate in similar cars were at Wakefield, we'd come out of Turn 2 and head up the hill. The distance to the next corner means that he hits the cutout probably a second before his braking point. That means he either has to bang it off the cutout, lift off the throttle, or grab another gear (and go back down a gear for the corner). All of which loses time. I just keep my foot pinned, and so I keep accelerating (albeit slowly) up to our braking point.

Even though I'm not making a great deal of power in that extra 600RPM, not having to stop accelerating gives me a major advantage in terms of my point to point speed.

Its the same if you're in a corner where your revs are up near redline. If you grab the next gear you lose a lot of punch, but with the stock cutout you might find yourself too close to the limiter.

Just remember that you can always short shift a car, regardless of what it revs to, and all else being equal the car's behaviour doesn't change. Allowing the engine to overrev past the cutout, on the other hand, is a lot more difficult.

Its just too brutal for me..

I see the advantages in this.. but i just dont think i have the heart to do it..

Stupid question but what exactly is the correct process of short shfting?.. I heard so many different interpretations of this I need to clear this up..

its not real smart revving an RB say more than 500 revs past the factory recommended...unless you are planning to do some internal upgrades...anyway a stock n/a RB wont make any more power by revving it to 8000...it will become breathless and past its efficiency point...all it will do is hurt the engine in the long run

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...