Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I've got an RB25DE Mines ECU for sale, that i havnt found the limiter on yet (well past 7500..)

It seems to have slightly leaner mixes and HEAPS more timing (esp down low)

selling because im saving for a pfc

If you want your car to rev, your gonna need the right cams to take you that far, valve springs - meh, i havnt had any problem with mine, you'd more want to worry about the bottom end taking it

BEE*R REV LIMITER FTW!!!

all that does is hold your revs at a lower level than the factory limiter... granted it keeps the fuel going and cuts the ignition, but all that does is make popping noises, increase exhaust temps, melt cats and in general reduce the life of your engine. oh and it shoots flames. meh.

Stupid question but what exactly is the correct process of short shfting?.. I heard so many different interpretations of this I need to clear this up..

My context for short shifting is to change gear before you hit the cutout. I think that's the common understanding.

I get the feeling your confusion is over "flat changing", which some people interpret as being clutchless and others consider to be "not lifting off the throttle".

Cheers scathing!

I heard both versions of flat changing.. and I believe the clutch is there for a reason.. use it..

I will occasionally change without lifting off gass, but you need a clutch if you want a gear box.. Unless theres a half mechanically decent way of flat changing without using the clutch. Ideas?

I heard this version of "short shifting" too.. kind of ironic though.. short?.. fuel cut?.. meh..

Short shifting isn't necessarily shifting before the limiter, but more shifting before the ideal point - for example shifting at 5800rpm when your peak power is at 6000rpm, or even shifting at 6200rpm when your still holding your peak power (because you'll shift into lower power, so your missing out).

The best way to shift perfectly, is you dyno your car, and figure the rpm where the power drops off (after peak power) vs the power your shifting into, for example, my car drops off about 10kw by limiter (currently using standard 25DET ECU) shifting then puts me right back into high revs and about the same power. If i was to shift right on peak power, i would be shifting back say ~ 30kw.

i.e. my old power (havnt dyno'd since yet) power peaked at 6000rpm and dropped to ~ 140 by limiter, at 5000rpm it was also at 140 and peak torque, so revving to limiter and shifting into peak torque is alot better than shifting at peak power back to ~ 4000rpm and building it all up again

That said, if i want to feel the power and have a bit of fun, i shift right on peak power, because all my gain is from 4000-6000, so thats where it rips you back and where all the fun is at.

These days though, keeps making power till limiter, without limiter i couldn't feel any drop off but fear of popping it made my safc dump fuel 7000rpm = flames flames flames and no ignition cut :dry:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
    • Yes they do. For some maybe. But for those used the most by abusers, ie Skylines, the numbers are known. The stock eyebrow height for R32/3 Skylines is about 365/375mm or thereabouts. The minimum such heights are recorded in adjacent columns in the database.
×
×
  • Create New...