Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I have installed my emanage ultimate and found I have an intermittent missfire. Mainly at idle and when holding around 5% throttle at any revs. After doing a datalog on the emanage, the missfire looks like the injector duty cycle is spiking to 99% intermittently. This is on the input duty cycle coming from the standard ecu. I have double checked all of the connections and no fix. It seems to be only one cylinder at a time missing (same cylinder or different ones im not sure) Car runs fine under load and the injector duty cycle acts as normal. I have noticed a few times when backing off from high rpm's, the duty cycle will spike up to 90 -95% and then gradually decrease to about 80% with the revs before dropping back down to 5% where it should be.

Does anyone know why the standard ecu would be spiking the injectors to nearly 100% duty cycle intermittently? Stuffed ecu or could it be something else like CAS. Attached the datalog for anyone who has the emanage log viewer showing the duty cycle input spikes.

r33.zip

I had the EXACT same problem with my R33 using an emanage ultimate. Had me and my tuner stumped, Would spike the injectors to 99% duty cycle for a split second whilst at light throttle.

Have heard that this was a fault with some EMU's, not too sure how true it is though. I ended up selling the EMU and getting a pfc instead, Cheers shane.

Damn thats not what I wanted to hear! Re-soldered all of the contacts again, still doing it.

The board I have is a D board although its a late serial number : 05076.

Also had a look at the bottom of the circuit board, and it looks like the aluminium retainer rail of the case is coming into contact with the tiny contacts on the board. Ran a length of insultation tape over the length of the board as a precuation.

mine does it too

I Have bought a Injector adapter harness but havent put it in yet (dont know if it will fix it ,but they say its to stop it running rich)

I also found that when it was missing at idle if i upped the revs to around 800Rpms it would go away

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I don't know if you can disassemble the thing and put it backwards for different ramp rates. They're both "2 ways" or both "1.5 ways" because well, 2 ways and 1.5 ways are the same 'thing' I do not know for sure, but I believe the 38420-RSS15-B5 is the 1 way, and 38420-RSS20-B5 is the two way. In other words, I predict Nissan considers this: to be a 1.5 way. No idea what actually happens when it arrives/you disassemble it. It would be an excellent question to ask Nismo directly! I somehow doubt you will get an answer though, I feel you would be the first person to document what you encounter when you open the box and the internet would be grateful.
    • I'm going to slap an old nismo logo sticker on my spare one and sell it to the land of the free for a thousand bucks
    • lol, probably should have read further!
    • Well - they have arrived.  And they are easy on the eye to put it mildly... These only have three bolts - but for a start there is a key that fits with vacuum like precision..  And as you can see by my ruler, the interface is large..   I listened to a podcast on HP Academy about Dan (KiwiCNC) and I'm more than comfortable he knows what he is doing. R35 Bearing assembly should arrive later today so can mock that up for a look. Can't wait to get these on and get some brake pressure logging too. IMG_3860.MP4
    • I would be very confident that they are the same parts (the 2 different SKUs). It seems very clear that you can drop the cam in the 2-way opening, or in the other opening. If you arrange it in the other opening in the same way that you see any other 1-way diff, ie, with the flat of the cam up against the 1° side of the opening, then it would work as a 1-way. It can only spread the ramps when driving forwards - cannot spread the ramps on overrun. It would then appear obvious that if you put the cam into the opening "backwards", that you would get the angled flats of the cam working onto the "points" of the 1° side of the opening, which would give you ramp spread in both loading directions. I do wonder if the forward direction of the 1.5-way config is equivalent to the forward direction of the 2-way, seeing as the cams are flipped and the angled surfaces on those would need to be the same on each side - AND - clearly when installed in either the 2-way or 1-1ay configuration they are not intended to work exactly the same (the ramp angles on the 2-way are 10° different between forward and backward, and the ramp doesn't exist in the 1-way config). 'twere me, I think I would rather actually have a set of rings that offered the 2-way with two different sets of ramp angles, say the 55/45 of the existing design and maybe a 45/37.5 combo for a less aggressive effect), AND another set of rings with a dedicated 1.5-way opening and a dedicated 1-way opening. The 1.5-way opening would actually have the steeper angle on the overdrive side that causes it to be less pushy than the forward drive angle, like you see in many other diffs. But really - if this Nismo thing is thought out properly and all those surfaces work on each other the way that they need to, who am I to argue?
×
×
  • Create New...