Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 91
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • 2 weeks later...

here's my ceff, Uras NS-01

17 x 9.5 +15 front, s14 LCA's, 20mm flared front

17 x 9.5 +15 rear with 25mm spacer= -10, custom flared metal guards

needs more low tho :)

post-53947-1238666699_thumb.jpg

post-53947-1238666829_thumb.jpg

technically yes, but if you imagined the spacer was apart of the wheel, the wheel would be neg 10.

Rear gaurds are pimp NICKCEFFY, haha you can see half the rear tyre pretty much.

demsA31 also looks the goods, makes me want a kit..

Cheers mate,

yeh love the big proper formed guards!!

makes me wanna do the laurel now as well, but then i've gotta get new rims for that as well!!! :cheers:

Edited by NICKCEFFY

3411412010_45fbdd1f01_b.jpg

Flushhhhhhhhh

3410600977_f8c896383d_b.jpg

Pants tighten everytime you look in the side mirror and just see the edge of the wheel chillin outside the guard.

3411414688_efc6a4ab30_b.jpg

Flushhh FAIL in the front by about 1.5cm. Didn't realise that the guard would flex so much when rolled. will need to get longer bolts and space it out or buy more Godfathers... MOAR GODFATHERS!!!1!

3410601569_01b8fdb4fb_b.jpg

3411414030_fefd61cd32_b.jpg

Fronts are 18x8.5 +35 (with a 3mm spacer to clear the strut) and rears are 18x9.5 +35 (perfect IMHO for cef)

Tyres are 215/40/18 in front and 225/40/18 in the rear, which tucks in under the rolled guard nicely, and still retains the crease line on the guard.

If I was to get another paid for the front I'd go 18x9" with a +25 or +26 offset. That would clear the strut AND space the outside of the wheel to be FLUSHHHHH with guard.

I might try R33 LCA's to try and push the track out a lil, but with the car running shocks and springs instead of coilovers, I can't have camber tops to cancel out the negative camber longer LCA's will give me :cool: Or is my theory flawed?

Hey man, wheels look good..could have gone a few mm lower, but Im a fan of low offset :devil:

Funky, yours look good too. Maybe a slightly skinnier rims with lower offset would be good, avoid having to use spacers?

Hey man, wheels look good..could have gone a few mm lower, but Im a fan of low offset :devil:

Funky, yours look good too. Maybe a slightly skinnier rims with lower offset would be good, avoid having to use spacers?

I wanted to go +25, But I couldn't find any that I liked.

(You were responding to me, right?)

Edited by DanShirts

yeah I'm gonna keep looking out for anothe rpair of godfathers in 9" with a +25 offset for the front, till i find them I'm just gonna lengthen the hub bolts and run 20mm spacers on the ones I have now to bring em out.

Cant really tell you about these rims.. Off a mates HR31, 16" 225/40 I think.. Knew the offset would be horrible, but we did it anyway! :banana:

3036_66916592850_717762850_1614745_6932323_n.jpg

Never bothered to put the suspension back in the front after Regency, as I drive it everyday. Not worth the hassle..So sit on the bonnet it was!

3036_66916597850_717762850_1614746_603535_n.jpg

3036_66916617850_717762850_1614749_557160_n.jpg

3036_66916632850_717762850_1614752_7913788_n.jpg

3036_66916602850_717762850_1614747_6739317_n.jpg

Was all for shits and giggles. :banana:

  • 1 month later...
  • 1 month later...
  • 4 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Block bump. $400. As above cyl 6 needs bore or sleeve.
    • I would think making the argument that the travel is limited by a spring flexing against a spring perch as "the same method". Later on in the document they do state that the spring can't bind on full bump travel and cannot come loose in full rebound travel as well. (which is all very sensible). The laws are actually pretty sensible and reasonable. It's just that the people who enforce and check them don't actually read them or know them accurately. "Oh, coilovers? Instant fail mate. Don't even need to look at it." - Guy who will be instantly reported by me. There is probably merit to people who do get defected for height also get defected for the suspension in that state that allows it. I did never consider the people who are complaining about coilovers being picked on are also running around at 50mm off the floor.
    • I think given SAU's knowledge of E85 we can strongly conclude that 10% ethanol in almost any situation is entirely fine. Almost all of the myths against E85 were overblown, let alone E10.
    • From your link See bold text, is this referring to damper settings, if so that may a issue for "some" inspectors, I cannot see aftermarket coilovers having the evidence that "must be available that its functional performance is equivalent to the original" Maybe just remove the adjustment knows and hope for the best???? Meh 5.2 Suspension travel In all instances, modifications to a vehicle’s suspension must ensure the integrity of the system and not compromise the ride quality. At least two thirds of the original suspension travel should be maintained in both directions (rebound (i.e. extension) and bump (i.e. compression)), and rebound must be limited by the same method used by the vehicle manufacturer or if this is not practicable due to the nature of the modification, an equivalent method. If an alternative method is used, evidence must be available that its functional performance is equivalent to the original.
    • They actually don't - They adhere to VSB14 rules just like Victoria. The rules are against CABIN adjustable height, and it quite clearly states that the height has to be within parameters. I asked the VASS engineer to confirm this when I got my car engineered and they refused to engineer the coilovers because they didn't meet the requirements for requiring engineering. (mine are height adjustable.) People "Not wanting to bother" with "Actually reading/knowing/adhering to the rules" should result in fines and immediately losing the ability to issue blue slips and/or RWC's in Vic.
×
×
  • Create New...