Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 91
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • 2 weeks later...

here's my ceff, Uras NS-01

17 x 9.5 +15 front, s14 LCA's, 20mm flared front

17 x 9.5 +15 rear with 25mm spacer= -10, custom flared metal guards

needs more low tho :)

post-53947-1238666699_thumb.jpg

post-53947-1238666829_thumb.jpg

technically yes, but if you imagined the spacer was apart of the wheel, the wheel would be neg 10.

Rear gaurds are pimp NICKCEFFY, haha you can see half the rear tyre pretty much.

demsA31 also looks the goods, makes me want a kit..

Cheers mate,

yeh love the big proper formed guards!!

makes me wanna do the laurel now as well, but then i've gotta get new rims for that as well!!! :cheers:

Edited by NICKCEFFY

3411412010_45fbdd1f01_b.jpg

Flushhhhhhhhh

3410600977_f8c896383d_b.jpg

Pants tighten everytime you look in the side mirror and just see the edge of the wheel chillin outside the guard.

3411414688_efc6a4ab30_b.jpg

Flushhh FAIL in the front by about 1.5cm. Didn't realise that the guard would flex so much when rolled. will need to get longer bolts and space it out or buy more Godfathers... MOAR GODFATHERS!!!1!

3410601569_01b8fdb4fb_b.jpg

3411414030_fefd61cd32_b.jpg

Fronts are 18x8.5 +35 (with a 3mm spacer to clear the strut) and rears are 18x9.5 +35 (perfect IMHO for cef)

Tyres are 215/40/18 in front and 225/40/18 in the rear, which tucks in under the rolled guard nicely, and still retains the crease line on the guard.

If I was to get another paid for the front I'd go 18x9" with a +25 or +26 offset. That would clear the strut AND space the outside of the wheel to be FLUSHHHHH with guard.

I might try R33 LCA's to try and push the track out a lil, but with the car running shocks and springs instead of coilovers, I can't have camber tops to cancel out the negative camber longer LCA's will give me :cool: Or is my theory flawed?

Hey man, wheels look good..could have gone a few mm lower, but Im a fan of low offset :devil:

Funky, yours look good too. Maybe a slightly skinnier rims with lower offset would be good, avoid having to use spacers?

Hey man, wheels look good..could have gone a few mm lower, but Im a fan of low offset :devil:

Funky, yours look good too. Maybe a slightly skinnier rims with lower offset would be good, avoid having to use spacers?

I wanted to go +25, But I couldn't find any that I liked.

(You were responding to me, right?)

Edited by DanShirts

yeah I'm gonna keep looking out for anothe rpair of godfathers in 9" with a +25 offset for the front, till i find them I'm just gonna lengthen the hub bolts and run 20mm spacers on the ones I have now to bring em out.

Cant really tell you about these rims.. Off a mates HR31, 16" 225/40 I think.. Knew the offset would be horrible, but we did it anyway! :banana:

3036_66916592850_717762850_1614745_6932323_n.jpg

Never bothered to put the suspension back in the front after Regency, as I drive it everyday. Not worth the hassle..So sit on the bonnet it was!

3036_66916597850_717762850_1614746_603535_n.jpg

3036_66916617850_717762850_1614749_557160_n.jpg

3036_66916632850_717762850_1614752_7913788_n.jpg

3036_66916602850_717762850_1614747_6739317_n.jpg

Was all for shits and giggles. :banana:

  • 1 month later...
  • 1 month later...
  • 4 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...