Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey Guys

In the stages or tearing my engine down, ready for a rebuild.

There are a few retailes of RB30 Rods at the moment

- SPOOL

- ARGO

- Rod Factory

But whats got me confused is

Centre to Centre: some have 152.5mm and some have 155.5mm

Will either of the 2 work?

Anyone else come across this and what have you done

JD

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/190554-rb30-rods-height-make-a-difference/
Share on other sites

Brad I spoke to you this morning about that, thanks for your help

Rods Factory, i know they are on ebay are 155.5mm

RacingPartsfactory.com also have them as 155.5mm

Will using the 155.5mm Rods pose a problem? I know they are 3mm longer, i am planning on using CP 8.2 Flat top Pistons with them

Edited by D1AUS

Umm yes - the pistom will protrude 3mm out of the bore and you wont be able to bolt the head on.

It just wont work - you will need to get a custom piston made to suit.

Brad I spoke to you this morning about that, thanks for your help

Rods Factory, i know they are on ebay are 155.5mm

RacingPartsfactory.com also have them as 155.5mm

Will using the 155.5mm Rods pose a problem? I know they are 3mm longer, i am planning on using CP 8.2 Flat top Pistons with them

But from my calculations, it is ok.

RB30 Specs

RB30 Deck Height - 9.075" (230.5mm)

Stroke - 85mm

Crank Throw - 42.5mm

Compression Height - 1.280" (32.5mm)

Using Spool/Argo Rods - 152.5 C/C

Deck Clearance = 230.5 - 42.5 - 152.5 - 32.5 = 3mm

Using RacingPartsFactory/Rod Factory Rods - 155.5 C/C

Deck Clearance = 230.5 - 42.5 - 155.5 - 32.5 = 0mm

Is that right by your calculations, therefore using either Rod, should not matter.

However, if you see an issue of deck clearance, you can always use RB25/26 pistons instead, as they have the same bore, but a smalled Compression Height

post-43743-1193213677_thumb.jpg

Edited by D1AUS

So that calculation above is wrong then??????????????????????

RB30 Compression Height - 1.280" (32.5mm)

RB26 Compression Height - 1.193" (30.3mm)

RB25 Compresson Height - 1.240" (31.5mm)

Using 152.5mm will yield 3mm Deck Clearance via that calculation

Using 155.5mm will yield 0mm Deck Clearnace via that calculation

Now thats even more confusing

Why not just use the Argo or Spool rods and be done with it? They both work without any issues?

Its not just a matter of simply using any rod. I'm trying to maximise the compression ratio etc with my setup. And with the calculations above and speaking to Distributor for CP in QLD.

Standard Rods have a 3mm deck height according to this calculation. As the CP RB30 Pistons are Dished not domed. Thats my arguement here.

Just trying to find out from others who have done this etc.

I understand Spool Rods are of good quality, but just seeing the available options to maximise the setup, thats all.

JD

Im building a 30/26 now with 9:1 comp using argo rods 152.4mm center to center

also using je custom piston compression ,height of 1.283,

0 deck height

havnt got the pistons yet but thats what i did to get the comp i want

Im building a 30/26 now with 9:1 comp using argo rods 152.4mm center to center

also using je custom piston compression ,height of 1.283,

0 deck height

havnt got the pistons yet but thats what i did to get the comp i want

Thanks for the feedback mate, I assume they are a domed piston????????

Im not trying to sell you my rods - just trying to explain that you are going to get in all sorts of shit of you use those ones with the 155.5 c/c

CP 8.2:1 are a flat top that come flush with the deck.

CP 9:0.1 are a domed piston. The flat of the piston come flush to the deck with a small dome in the centre.

CP RB30ET pistons have a small dish with valve reliefs.

To get 8.5:1 your prob best to use the 8.2:1 and skim the head - but obviously work backwards and cc everything first to calculate how much to take off the head.

Im not trying to sell you my rods - just trying to explain that you are going to get in all sorts of shit of you use those ones with the 155.5 c/c

CP 8.2:1 are a flat top that come flush with the deck.

CP 9:0.1 are a domed piston. The flat of the piston come flush to the deck with a small dome in the centre.

CP RB30ET pistons have a small dish with valve reliefs.

To get 8.5:1 your prob best to use the 8.2:1 and skim the head - but obviously work backwards and cc everything first to calculate how much to take off the head.

Brad

By all means i do appreciate all your help, thanks very much

I'm just going by all the figures at the moment. Obviously, I will dummy everything up check chamber cc etc.

Just by the specs, thats what i get from the calculation. I know standard rod is 152.5mm

From your experience, what is the standard deck clearance for RB30? standard parts

deck height is 0 rod length should be 6"{152.5m} dont use any other rod length

and yes my piston will be dome

if u use the cp piston u can buy the right one off the shelf for 8.5:1 comp

u will only achive this if ur block height is standard and combustion chamber cc's are close to standard{65cc"s from memory}

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
    • I know I have to get a wheel alignment but until then I just need to bring the rear tyres in a bit they're wearing to the belt on the inside and brand new on the outside edge. I did shorten the arms a bit but got it wrong now after a few klms the Slip and VDC lights come on. I'd just like to get it to a point where I can drive for another week or two before getting an alignment. I've had to pay a lot of other stuff recently so doing it myself is my only option 
    • You just need a wheel alignment after, so just set them to the same as current and drive to the shop. As there are 2 upper links it may also be worth adding adjustable upper front links at the same time; these reduce bump steer when you move the camber (note that setting those correctly takes a lot longer as you have to recheck the camber at each length of the toe arm, through a range of movement, so you could just ignore that unless the handling becomes unpredictable)
×
×
  • Create New...