Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Fully understand your point I have seen these power outputs in Adelaide not usre of the life of this though so you might be right with that one as any major increase in power will sure kill the standard turbo in the long run. But this figure is not impossible and MAYBE with multi stage boost controller can achieve this when it is needed then back to a reliable amount of boost to protect the turbo. But then you are looking at more expences.

  • Replies 44
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

I'll bet your car on it that you will get over 200rwkw :ninja:
bro u said over 200rwkw now ur saying over 250rwkw thats a big difference there mate. make up ur mind 50rwkw is a big difference.

Because I stated that as a comment BRO! And these are all estimates like my other statement "i would imagine around the 250rwkw+ mark"

you won't see over 200rwkw without something done to the turbo and injectors...
Stock turbo and injectors can't make 250rwkw except on a very happy dyno. 190-210rwkw.

Well I am happy to say I am wrong but I would do know that with cam gears major increase is gained with standard turbo etc with exhaust and maybe ecu and even bppst upto 1bar if the budget will allow the firtment of a intercooler then i would imagine over 210rwkw and closer to my result of AROUND 250rwkw.

Well I know that since a Neo motor standard is around!!!!!! 206kw which at the wheels is AROUND 180rwkw GIVE or TAKE as I don’t work for NASA and this is not crucial for the lives of crew members then I think that we all can give a little slack in our gestimations on power out put.

So I have seen Neo Motors get over the 220rwkw mark AND NO before you ask I don’t have proof on me so I would imagine that it is not an impossible feet to reach a output greater then 200kw as some say is almost impossible to reach.

Now without writing a book

I seen allot of tuning in Adelaide and by different people. These tunes may not be safe but can be done. Maybe 250 was a little high but I don’t think it is impossible to get close to it

What's the matter with you boys you jump to argue just like year 7 school boys about who's got bigger pecker ccc...! :laughing-smiley-014:

The new guy just wanted some simple mods advise to get started and still be safe and legal.

All you doing is confusing the bloke and he most likely doesn't understand your jargon.

Dave :)

Just stick to a new intake pod and turbo-back exhaust for now mate.

And if you decide to throw on a boost controller stay at 10psi or lower, stock turbo's are ceramic and very weak.

Before thinking about anything major (turbo/injectors/fuel pump/ECU/front mount/suspension/wheels) make a plan of what you want, make a budget, and find some reputable places to buy parts and mechanics and tuners who will put it all together for you.

For street use i wouldn't go crazy because you'll smash most cars performance-wise with only a few mods to the R34.

Have fun!

a car is a hell of a lot more than brakes, driveline and suspension. well maybe not a hell of a lot but still...dont forget that things break, wear out, need fixing etc. fair enough its a r34 but unless its straight off the showroom floor, you are gonna need to think about these things too (tyres, servicing, etc).

I'm running a R34 GT non turbo, and i have to say the first thing i noticed was the suspension is rather bouncy along with a set of avg yamma tires... Personally i'm gonna work on that area... hopefully stop me from "Auto-drifting" into peoples faces!!!!!!! lol.

- In terms of power they output just under 200KW Base normally i've found; prob not worth bouncing up the power till you can go around a corner without hitting the fences!

* in all honestly, some EDC Red's wouldn't hurt either, i've currently got worn out Nismos on it and being on my L's atm isn't helping.

NEHOOOO!!!! long live NSW.

Cya all at Wiseman's Ferry. - Peace.

HAHA donut dave is right now I am confused is there a simple systematic method of modifying the car? say for example 1st exhaust 2nd air filter 3rd etc. Also thinking abt putting a kit on my car too. Where can I go check out some body kits saw on one of the recent posts with a white 34 loved that body kit..Like reading the posts how you guys were arguing but I didn't understand any of it. Thanks alot guys I am slowing getting to understand the complex world of modifying. Will post a pic of my baby soon.

mate,

the first mods to look at what Id suggest are

intake mods (hi-flow panel filter in airbox) or a pod with a cold air feed and a turbo back exhaust at the same time.

after that?

springs and shocks and a kit somewhere in between

they are small basic mods, but the car will be more alive and you'll love it....for a small amount of time! :)

there are general guidelines but every one does it different. thats what makes the car your own. for exxy, my plan is this (performance only): finish zorst, r34 smic, boost control and guage, safc, fuel stuff etc. some ppl may get the safc first or boost, or something completely different. the best advice i can give you is this - research research research, on sau, other sites, other owners, anywhere. know what a mod does to/for your car b4 you do it. that way you are less likely to do damage, get ripped off and waste cash

good luck man :)

yeh i am slowly researching but there is just too much jargon and it all so confusing lol i dont know where to start haha is there some sort of function where all the members bring out there cars and take for a drive i know some ppl with hondas who take there rides for group cruises would like to go for a cruise like that and have a look at ur guys rides and also have a look at ur mods etc

I read this forum for 3 months solid before I bought my car. It took me another 4 years to get where I am now in terms of knowledge. There is still tons I don't know.

Read, read, read. Ask questions along the way, but ask them like, 'what is this?' rather than 'what is better?'. You figure out what's better yourself. That's the fun of it all.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You won't need to do that if your happy to learn to tune it yourself. You 100% do not need to do that. It is not part of the learning process. It's not like driving on track and 'finding the limit by stepping over the limit'. You should not ever accidently blow up an engine and you should have setup the ECU's engine protection to save you from yourself while you are learning anyway. Plenty of us have tuned their own cars, myself included. We still come here for advice/guidance/new ideas etc.  What have you been doing so far to learn how to tune?
    • Put the ECU's MAP line in your mouth. Blow as hard as you can. You should be able to see about 10 kPa, maybe 15 kPa positive pressure. Suck on it. You should be able to generate a decent vacuum to about the same level also. Note that this is only ~2 psi either way. If the MAP is reading -5 psi all the time, ignition on, engine running or not, driving around or not, then it is severely f**ked. Also, you SHOULD NOT BE DRIVING IT WITHOUT A LOAD REFERENCE. You will break the engine. Badly.
    • Could be correct. Meter might be that far out. Compare against a known 5 ohm 1% resistor.
    • @Murray_Calavera  If I were an expert I wouldn't be in here looking for assistance.  I am extremely computer literate, have above average understanding on how things should be working and how they should tie together.  If I need to go to a professional tuner so be it, but I'd much rather learn and do things myself even if it means looking for some guidance along the way and blowing up a few engines. @GTSBoy  I was hoping it would be as simple as a large vacuum leak somewhere but I'm unable to find anything, all lines seem to be well capped or going where they need to be, and when removed there is vacuum felt on the tube.  It would be odd for the Haltech built in MAP to be faulty, the GTT tune I imported had it enabled from the start, I incorrectly assumed it was reading a signal from the stock MAP, but that doesn't exist.  After running a vacuum hose to the ECU the signal doesn't change more than 0.2 in either direction.   I'll probably upload a video of my settings tomorrow, as it stands I'm able to daily drive, but getting stuttering when giving it gas from idle, so pulling away from lights is a slow process of revving it up and feathering the clutch until its moving, then it will accelerate fine.  It sounds like I need to get to the bottom of the manifold pressure issue, but the ignition timing section is most intimidating to me and will probably let a pro do that part.  Tomorrow I'll try a different vacuum line to T off of, with any luck I selected one that was already bypassed during the DBW swap.  (edit: I went out and did it right now, the line I had chosen did appear to have no vacuum on it, it used to go to the front of the intake, I've now completely blocked that one off at the bracket that holds several vacuum lines by the firewall.  I T'd into the vacuum line that goes from that bracket to the vacuum pump at the front of the car, but no change in the MAP readings).  Using the new vacuum line that has obvious vacuum on the hose, im still only getting readings between -6.0 and -5.2.  I'm wondering why the ECU was detecting -5.3 when nothing was connected to the MAP nipple and ECU MAP selected as the source. @feartherb26  I do have +T in the works but wanted to wait until Spring to start with that swap since this is my good winter AWD vehicle.  When removing the butterfly, did it leave a bunch of holes in the manifold that you needed to plug?  I thought about removing it but assumed it would be a mess.   I notice no difference when capping the vacuum line to it or letting it do its thing.  This whole thing has convinced me to just get a forward facing manifold when the time comes though.
    • Update: tested my spark plugs that are supposed to be 5ohms with a 10% deviation and one gave me a 0 ohms reading and the rest were 3.9ohm<, so one bad and the others on their way out.
×
×
  • Create New...