Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Well just got the demo about 30 mins ago and finished it already. Kinda annoying seeing as its 1.8gb just for a demo.

Still, was as good as i expected and definitely worth 99usd for the pre order.

One thing that got me was it set everything to medium gfx wise.

Most demanding game ever, i have a 3G core duo 4 g or ram and a 8800 GTS 320 and its medium! what do they want from me?

anyhoo was bored cause demo is so short.

anyone who's been living under a rock and has no idea what im talking about. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HKgpu8BpcqM

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/191408-crysis/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 44
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

yup, put my pre-order in for the collectors edition ages ago, this is the sole reason for me building my new pc :D

in the meantime, I picked up Team Fortress 2 last week, bloody awesome game that plays on low spec pc's without a problem (i'm talking AGP 6800 Ultra grade lol).

Well just got the demo about 30 mins ago and finished it already. Kinda annoying seeing as its 1.8gb just for a demo.

Still, was as good as i expected and definitely worth 99usd for the pre order.

One thing that got me was it set everything to medium gfx wise.

Most demanding game ever, i have a 3G core duo 4 g or ram and a 8800 GTS 320 and its medium! what do they want from me?

anyhoo was bored cause demo is so short.

anyone who's been living under a rock and has no idea what im talking about. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HKgpu8BpcqM

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/191408-crysis/#findComment-3444098
Share on other sites

Man i had to build a new computer for Oblivion, then I did it again recently for Bio Shock... This is taking all the fun out of the games... I Don't have a high def monitor, so it's hardly worth it!

This coming out on Xbox? :D

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/191408-crysis/#findComment-3444112
Share on other sites

If you can run bio shock on high you should be able to get pretty close in crysis. A lot of the stuff in crysis is DX10 dependant (same as bio shock i belive), so until they refine the drivers to match the lower spec hardware (8800gts style) you'll need the gtx's and the like.

But I agree, the need for high end hardware hurts the hip pocket these days.

Man i had to build a new computer for Oblivion, then I did it again recently for Bio Shock... This is taking all the fun out of the games... I Don't have a high def monitor, so it's hardly worth it!

This coming out on Xbox? :D

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/191408-crysis/#findComment-3444134
Share on other sites

I heard it had to have a DX10 card to run.

xbox!! bah apox on those evil machines. Ill only ever have a wii a ps3 and a PC thanks very much :D

You would need a crazy rig to run in high def anyway. I manged the native of 1680x1050 ok with medium settings. Im assuming that the full version will work some of the bugs out too.

As mentioned if u can run bioshock on high then crysis should be fine.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/191408-crysis/#findComment-3444155
Share on other sites

Long live bf2 hehe.

both my room mates have pretty heavy duty rigs, both with 8800GTX Ultra's on board, they are getting reasonable performance at the native resolution (1680x1050), but the demo does have a lot of error checking and code that isn't refined. The demo was released as a beta anyway so its to be expected. I tried to run it on my old rig and it booted and played but got the yellow sprites everywhere lol.

i downloaded the demo and was pretty disapointed to be honest . dont think i will be shelling out for the full version .

will just stick to battle field 2 and sprintcars to knoxville for now.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/191408-crysis/#findComment-3444182
Share on other sites

should still work on xp, basically it will run under directx 9 but will have all the dx10 functionality turned off. I ran it on my machine with xp pro and dx9, one roommate has xp pro/dx9, the other vista/dx10.

Do you need Vista for this, as DX10 only works on Vista right ?
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/191408-crysis/#findComment-3444203
Share on other sites

I'm not upgrading to Vista just to play a game though :D

i see no better reason...

As for the shiny factor I tended to go that way in the past turning down gfx in favour of speed etc. Thing is i really enjoyed farcry and it just happend to look good too. Same with Crysis me thinks. plus now i can afford to good tech not teh hand me downs i used to run.

Isnt it great they are releasing some good games these days.... portal was sweet

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/191408-crysis/#findComment-3444337
Share on other sites

8800 GTX kicks ass compared to a GTS and is well worth the extra few hundred bucks. so far every game out on the market (and yes, I've got and tried them all - bioshock, world in conflict, quake wars etc.) runs perfectly smooth in 1920x1440 with high or very high settings. Still to check out Crysis as it seems absolutely stunning in regards to graphical and physical details, however I do not want a demo and will wait until a scene release. But I'm sure a fairly decent setup with a GTX will run it smoothly on high settings unless the software itself is poorly developed.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/191408-crysis/#findComment-3448735
Share on other sites

8800 GTX kicks ass compared to a GTS and is well worth the extra few hundred bucks. so far every game out on the market (and yes, I've got and tried them all - bioshock, world in conflict, quake wars etc.) runs perfectly smooth in 1920x1440 with high or very high settings. Still to check out Crysis as it seems absolutely stunning in regards to graphical and physical details, however I do not want a demo and will wait until a scene release. But I'm sure a fairly decent setup with a GTX will run it smoothly on high settings unless the software itself is poorly developed.

I agree to some extent, there are few variables that are going to make it interesting, some of my mates are running sli gtx's and crossfires, they are saying they can get crysis on high but not very high, says that it will play but as soon as things start to get heavy (lots of gun fights) the computer slows RIGHT down (talking below 20 FPS). But it IS a Beta Demo so the code won't be perfected and there will be a lot of error catching code in there to slow things down.

That said there is also some news doing the rounds that DX10.1 will not be compatible with the current set of GTX cards (this I find hard to belive as I can't see the current crop of 8800's changing the actual PCB design to much.

I think a lot of this is down to drivers and software, once DX10 is fully fledged I rekon it will be sweet as, most 8800 gts's (mainly 640mb versions) will be able to run crysis on high, and if all your looking for is liek a 22" resolution of 1680 by 1050 you should be sweet. Anything bigger and ur gonna want the gtx for sure though.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/191408-crysis/#findComment-3448784
Share on other sites

As they did with Far Cry, Crytek have built a game that on the highest settings will only run well on the next generation of GPUs. They did the same with Far Cry :)

It means the game lasts more than just the current "generation" of games, and it's also a challenge to video card manu's to make GFX cards to run it well.

We'll see Crysis as a benchmark game for over 12 months, nothing pushes your system like this game ;)

Graphics, well they are unreal! Much better than WIC (and WIC is really nice!!)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/191408-crysis/#findComment-3448808
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
×
×
  • Create New...