Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Guys can anyone advise as to whether a standard PFC is sufficient for 300rwkw with standard internals or djetro required.?

What power figures require the djetro..?

I'd rather not get the djetro if not required as I've been told that it costs alot more to tune etc.

Its for a 32gtr.

Cheers,

Edited by PX29
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/194923-standard-pfc-or-djetro/
Share on other sites

For most setups both tune the same and one takes no longer than the other, the std PFC is good for whatever AFm you choose to use. i tend to use the d-jetro for radically cammed engines as it actually tunes up quicker... generally speaking the std PFC will offer better fuel economy.

For most setups both tune the same and one takes no longer than the other, the std PFC is good for whatever AFm you choose to use. i tend to use the d-jetro for radically cammed engines as it actually tunes up quicker... generally speaking the std PFC will offer better fuel economy.

Thanks alot for the info about tuning(I thought standard comes with a base tune, where djetro had to be tuned from scratch.?).

So it really then depends whether I can achieve 300rwkw with standard AFM's......is this possible....or do I need Z32's...??

Edited by PX29

well the Ljetro gets better economy as it runs MAFs instead of the twin map sensors on the Djetro version. they both come with base maps to start from. MAF sensors effectively measure air density/flow where as map sensors just measure pressure so under lots of condition the MAF sensor gives a finer reading.

they both cost the same to tune, but the big difference is the Djetro costs a lot more to install as you need to remove the plenum to fit the pressure feeds for the map sensors (unless you want to risk dropping swarf into the engine). the Ljetro of course is just plug in. BUT I would suggest that 300rwkw updraged MAF sensors is a good idea. either VG30s or Nismos etc. standard 26 Mafs will hit 5.115v at about 260rwkw. you can still tune a car with them to about 300rwkw or even more if you want, but it's much nicer to have a sensor that is still giving usable readings right to peak power/air flow.

well the Ljetro gets better economy as it runs MAFs instead of the twin map sensors on the Djetro version. they both come with base maps to start from. MAF sensors effectively measure air density/flow where as map sensors just measure pressure so under lots of condition the MAF sensor gives a finer reading.

they both cost the same to tune, but the big difference is the Djetro costs a lot more to install as you need to remove the plenum to fit the pressure feeds for the map sensors (unless you want to risk dropping swarf into the engine). the Ljetro of course is just plug in. BUT I would suggest that 300rwkw updraged MAF sensors is a good idea. either VG30s or Nismos etc. standard 26 Mafs will hit 5.115v at about 260rwkw. you can still tune a car with them to about 300rwkw or even more if you want, but it's much nicer to have a sensor that is still giving usable readings right to peak power/air flow.

Thanks for the response, very informative.

Bit confused with this Ljetro..?.....is this another name for the standard PFC...?,..cant seem to find it on the Nengun or Greenline webpages.

What would be the go then..... Standard, Djetro, Ljetro...?? Dont want to spend more than I need too..

Trying to determine which one is best suited for me.

Cheers,

Edited by PX29
Thanks Beer Baron

Ljetro is just the normal PFC

Cool.

Been reading from the link below and there seems to be no real advantage going with the Djetro.

http://paulr33.sauvic.com.au/docs/powerfc-...erfc-faq.htm#61

Standard/Ljetro PCF seems to be the go-er at this stage. Anyone else want to enlighten me with their experiences or recommendations. I want to order a unit soon so I can start the 5-6week wait.

Cheers,

paulr33 suffers from MAPphobia :D

But in all seriousness, talk your tuner and discuss what he is most comfortable with.

I have seen Djetro installs on standard GT-Rs make power gains over the standard MAF version PFC without losing drivability.

Ive seen MAF make better power on GTRs with stock throttlebodys and found power with Djetros by finding ways of stopping the MAP pulse that they(And all other MAP ECUs)have,Mickos ex GTR is way down on power with its Djetro than it was with MAF PFC (400hp MAF 380hp Djetro) I spend much time Datalogging MAP signals and find good gains when we get a smooth input. 300KW is easy for MAF so you wont have to upgrade.

Sorry to hijack, but im looking at going d-jetro as well, and for me to sell the L and get a D is cheaper than buying AFMS for the L.

Ill need a new tune with the new engine package, and im going to make custom intake piping anyway whether if be for 80afm or no afm....

Whats best? Engine will be -5 equipped.

I run the D-jetro on my RB26 - I find I have no dramas at all, runs well, was easy to tune, comes with a base map etc. Common misconception is that you have to remove the inlet manifold. I can confirm this is NOT the case - I have my MAP sensors connected via a T piece to a vacuum feed on the inlet manifold and it runs fine. Talking with the guys at Willal racing, this is exactly what they do and haven't found any differences over running it this way vs drill and tapping fittings into the runners.

Benefits on the d jetro - removing the AFM removes inlet restrictions, also there is obviously no need to upgrade your AFM's once you max them out so that saves you quite a conserable amount of $$.

Economy - I am still obtaining 400 - 430 kms per tank around town running 340 rwkws and have seen 500+ open road. I don't exactly drive it all that economically either - (what point is horsepower if you don't use it?)

I just figured that $$L Jetro + 2xAFMs + tune > Djetro + tune + sell AFMs (its a big difference, trust me)

If you have any questions let me know - happy to answer them.

Edited by Blue32

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • As discussed in the previous post, the bushes in the 110 needed replacing. I took this opportunity to replace the castor bushes, the front lower control arm, lower the car and get the alignment dialled in with new tyres. I took it down to Alignment Motorsports on the GC to get this work done and also get more out of the Shockworks as I felt like I wasn't getting the full use out of them.  To cut a very long story short, it ended up being the case the passenger side castor arm wouldn't accept the brand new bush as the sleeve had worn badly enough to the point you could push the new bush in by hand and completely through. Trying a pair of TRD bushes didn't fix the issue either (I had originally gone with Hardrace bushes). We needed to urgently source another castor arm, and thankfully this was sourced and the guys at the shop worked on my car until 7pm on a Saturday to get everything done. The car rides a lot nicer now with the suspension dialled in properly. Lowered the car a little as well to suit the lower profile front tyres, and just bring the car down generally. Eternally thankful for the guys down at the shop to get the car sorted, we both pulled big favours from our contacts to get it done on the Saturday.  Also plugged in the new Stedi foglights into the S15, and even from a quick test in the garage I'm keen to see how they look out on the road. I had some concerns about the length of the LED body and whether it'd fit in the foglight housing but it's fine.  I've got a small window coming up next month where I'll likely get a little paint work done on the 110 to remove the rear wing, add a boot wing and roof wing, get the side skirt fixed up and colour match the little panel on the tail lights so that I can install some badges that I've kept in storage. I'm also tempted to put in a new pair of headlights on the 110.  Until then, here's some more pictures from Easter this year. 
    • I would put a fuel pressure gauge between the filter and the fuel rail, see if it's maintaining good fuel pressure at idle going up to the point when it stalls. Do you see any strange behavior in commanded fuel leading up to the point when it stalls? You might have to start going through the service manual and doing a long list of sensor tests if it's not the fuel system for whatever reason.
    • Hi,  Just joined the forum so I could share my "fix" of this problem. Might be of use to someone. Had the same hunting at idle issue on my V36 with VQ35HR engine after swapping the engine because the original one got overheated.  While changing the engine I made the mistake of cleaning the throttle bodies and tried all the tricks i could find to do a throttle relearn with no luck. Gave in and took it to a shop and they couldn't sort it. Then took it to my local Nissan dealership and they couldn't get it to idle properly. They said I'd need to replace the throttle bodies and the ecu probably costing more than the car is worth. So I had the idea of replacing the carbon I cleaned out with a thin layer of super glue and it's back to normal idle now. Bit rough but saved the car from the wreckers 🤣
    • After my last update, I went ahead with cleaning and restoring the entire fuel system. This included removing the tank and cleaning it with the Beyond Balistics solution, power washing it multiple times, drying it thoroughly, rinsing with IPA, drying again with heat gun and compressed air. Also, cleaning out the lines, fuel rail, and replacing the fuel pump with an OEM-style one. During the cleaning process, I replaced several hoses - including the breather hose on the fuel tank, which turned out to be the cause of the earlier fuel leak. This is what the old fuel filter looked like: Fuel tank before cleaning: Dirty Fuel Tank.mp4   Fuel tank after cleaning (some staining remains): Clean Fuel Tank.mp4 Both the OEM 270cc and new DeatschWerks 550cc injectors were cleaned professionally by a shop. Before reassembling everything, I tested the fuel flow by running the pump output into a container at the fuel filter location - flow looked good. I then fitted the new fuel filter and reassembled the rest of the system. Fuel Flow Test.mp4 Test 1 - 550cc injectors Ran the new fuel pump with its supplied diagonal strainer (different from OEM’s flat strainer) and my 550cc injectors using the same resized-injector map I had successfully used before. At first, it idled roughly and stalled when I applied throttle. Checked the spark plugs and found that they were fouled with carbon (likely from the earlier overly rich running when the injectors were clogged). After cleaning the plugs, the car started fine. However, it would only idle for 30–60 seconds before stalling, and while driving it would feel like a “fuel cut” after a few seconds - though it wouldn’t fully stall. Test 2 – Strainer swap Suspecting the diagonal strainer might not be reaching the tank bottom, I swapped it for the original flat strainer and filled the tank with ~45L of fuel. The issue persisted exactly the same. Test 3 – OEM injectors To eliminate tuning variables, I reinstalled the OEM 270cc injectors and reverted to the original map. Cleaned the spark plugs again just in-case. The stalling and “fuel cut” still remained.   At this stage, I suspect an intermittent power or connection fault at the fuel pump hanger, caused during the cleaning process. This has led me to look into getting Frenchy’s fuel hanger and replacing the unit entirely. TL;DR: Cleaned and restored the fuel system (tank, lines, rail, pump). Tested 550cc injectors with the same resized-injector map as before, but the car stalls at idle and experiences what feels like “fuel cut” after a few seconds of driving. Swapped back to OEM injectors with original map to rule out tuning, but the issue persists. Now suspecting an intermittent power or connection fault at the fuel pump hanger, possibly cause by the cleaning process.  
×
×
  • Create New...