Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Guest Robo's

Can you guys who have performed a before and after feeling or rwkw increase, post your experiences. For my reading this would have to be the major increase in power, as its straight after the turbo. No use having a strangled exhaust after your turbo then mating up to a gigantic cat-back exhaust. Sounds like your defeating the purpose.

:)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/19522-your-experiences-with-dump-pipes/
Share on other sites

there isnt any noticable kw increase however the car revs a lot nicer and feels a bit more free to drive if that makes sense. oh the car is also more responsive pick up wise and it also made my turbo spooling a lot louder. worth the money with hi flow cat of course

I noticed a gain on the 'seat of the pants' dyno... Maybe about 5-8 cheaks worth (or about 10 skid-marks in the old scale).

It also felt like it spooled up a little quicker and the boost didn't seem to drop off as much high in the rev range.

Worth the money I say.

J

I agree with the posts above. I started with a cat back 4" system and then got a front pipe and split dump. I didn't notice a massive HP gain, but it will come on boost quicker, and increase top end.

As for doing the dump/front first - if you're looking for most HP gain, then the cat back will be better value for money to start with; then do the dump/front pipe. That said, the closer the restriction to the turbo, the greater the effect on flow efficiency; for example, if i put a silencer in my rear muffler (reducing the effective diameter to say 2"), it will have less of a flow distubance and thus effect than having a 2" dump pipe and 4" cat back.

So, in conclusion, do the cat back first, then worry about the dump/front if you are strapped for the mulla. Bang for buck.

When I put my combo dump/front pipe with a separate wastegate line I noticed a fair difference. I already had a catback system too. Although I don't have any dyno figures to back it up, I feel it really helped my midrange as it felt kind of flat before hand.

Probably the best thing about it though was that the turbo was now audible ;)

EDIT: Almost forgot - My combo pipe was HPC coated, so that may have made a difference. Apparently it brings on boost sooner with the coating. If anything I felt it came on boost later, but harder.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Ha, well, it's been.... a bit of a journey. Things have taken much longer than I'd hoped. I'll probably put up a thread at some stage. Hopefully soon. The car's not done any kms since my update in June though, put it that way.
    • Here's the chart for fuel pressure vs. current draw, assuming your base fuel pressure is 3 bar and you run like 0.5bar boost on WOT, you should only momentarily hit 9amps here and there. (Ignore my prev post, I cannot read a chart these days it seems)
    • Those comp test results are not hideous. Whether they are accurate or not (ie, when that comp tester says 140 psi, is the real pressure120, 140 or 160?) is unknown to us. The state of the battery used to crank it over is unknown, etc etc. Many people around here would say that the absolute values and the spread are perfectly fine to just add boost and keep going. I personally would be happier with a narrower spread than that, but even the diff between 125 and 145 is not terrible. That one cylinder at 125 though, has probably copped some damage relative to the others. You should inspect the valves seeing as you've got it open. Do you know how to measure installed ring gaps? That, and an inspection of the rings themselves, is how you will determine whether they need to be replaced. If you're not good to do these things, take the block and the pistons and rings to a shop that is, and ask them for the go/no-go on them. Do the bores need a hone at all? If so, you might well be justified in getting some different pistons in order to get away from the ring supply problem. Whether you're happy to spend a lot more money right now, on more gear, rather than less money, but an amount that looks stupid given that you will only get a handful of rings in exchange for that money, is for you to decide.
    • also possibly backed up to my filler and shat down it! 🤣
    • Ok so i would love some advice here please, i purchased an R33 a few months back and its had a few mods done to the engine, its an RB25det running a Master ECU, 1200cc injectors, bigger turbo, oil cooler, oil filter relocation kit, Spool H-beam rods, acl/ross pistons. When i removed the motor from the vehicle (as its getting a respray) i thought i would compression test it and these are the following results. Cylinder 1-145psi, Cylinder 2-143psi, Cylinder 3-125psi, Cylinder 4-145psi, Cylinder 5-140psi, Cylinder 6-135psi this test was done with the motor on the ground and powering up the starter motor. I dropped the sump and found broken oil squirters on cylinder 3,5 and 6. I was told my rings are probably worn so i stripped the motor completely to get a new set of rings for it. The trouble is no one has these rings anywhere and they have to be custom made by Ross over in the states and will cost about $600+$200 delivery. My question is how can i tell if my rings are at fault and if they are still ok and is this price ok for a set of rings?
×
×
  • Create New...