Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Folks, the 'fixed' or 'rule of thumb' power loss is a fallacy.

Lets say Car A has a 100 hp engine, and measures 70hp at the rear wheels. Thats a 30% loss through the drivetrain.

The same Car A, except I replace the engine with a 350 Chev rated at 300hp. Without changing anything in the transmission or drivetrain, is it fair to say there still will be a 30% loss? All of a sudden the transmission and drivetrain is soaking up 60 more hp for no reason? Nope.

Without putting an engine on an engine dyno, any power at the crank figures are pure guesswork. Look at the top fuel cars in the States - for years they have been working out their engine power using mass x acceleration, reconing that their engines produced 6,000hp...not so long ago they worked out how to measure the torque they output with a special torque sensor in the drivetrain and now say their engines are putting out 9,000hp! Thats a 3,000 hp difference. The guys who did the initial calculations are like the top engine builders, so they are in no way backwards or stupid.

Car manufacturers also measure their engines power outputs in different ways (eg with no accessories like alternators or power steering pump) so what they may quote in their sales brochures has as much substance and use as a used tissue.

Be careful with the car weights as well, I used to own a G-Tech and once measured my car on two different certified weighbridges on the same day. Weight 1 with a full tank and me was 1535kg, weight 2 was 100kg less. Both of these weigh bridges were commercial and recently tested and certified. I figure the 1535kg weight to be the correct one.

G

These are Top fuel cars - they look like a long rail with the engine at the back. Can't compare them to any form of road car! Does the quarter in about 4.6 seconds at about 300 mph.

gal_photo1a.jpg

Picture big alloy v8's of about 8.9 litres pulling 8500 rpm, a supercharger pushing in 1,640 cubic meters of air a minute, burning 4 litres of nitromethane a second (the fuel is 3 times more efficient than petrol)

gal_photo8a.jpg

G

Sheesh! That's some serious stuff!!! I'm guessing you'd soil your pants too when behind the wheel of one? :) Just a question, why a supercharger? What are the benefits of that over a turbo? I know that superchargers have less (or no) lag cos they don't use exhaust gases to spool them up. But why is it that nowadays the turbo seems more popular than the supercharger? Anyone?

Superchargers are driven off the crankshaft and rob a fair about of power - their main advantage over a turbo is that they produce boost at all revs. On the flip side, they can be noisy, they use belts which need checking and careful maintenance. And cost lots!

I think turbochargers are more popular for economic reasons - they cost less, and produce some very nice results as our Skylines can attest.

Oh and those top fuel engines - they last one run on the drag strip. Often when you watch them on TV you can see a cylinder or two die halfway down the strip...sometimes they expire in spectacular fireballs. The crews rebuild the engines between runs, it's amazing to watch them work - look out for the NHRA drags on ESPN etc.

G

GraemWi: No they do not rebuild the engines every run. They ususally just take off the sump and make sure all the gallieries are cleared and some other general maintanice. But they definately dont rebuild them all the time.

Also that puff of smoke that u usually see is most of the time just wheelspin. Some times it is an engine letting go, but almost all of the time, the top fuelers loose traction down the strip and make puffs of smoke.

Nar DanS15 we didn't do any run tesing for 0-100 or 1/4 mile times. The road we were testing were getting a bit busy, so we left it hehe :wave:. I'll try again with next time with a different weight measurement. This time we will take in consideration of our weight and the fuel weight. Maybe I'll have to test it near an empty tank as I wouldn't have a clue how much fuel will weight at full tank etc.

Predator: Yeah that will be intresting to know what's going on at the dyno day. Do you know when is it or where is it??

SORRY GUYS maybe I should of mention this earlier but don't know it this matters or not to my rw output but my car is an AUTO... ;)

Originally posted by EnricoPalazzo

GraemWi: No they do not rebuild the engines every run. They ususally just take off the sump and make sure all the gallieries are cleared and some other general maintanice. But they definately dont rebuild them all the time.

Also that puff of smoke that u usually see is most of the time just wheelspin. Some times it is an engine letting go, but almost all of the time, the top fuelers loose traction down the strip and make puffs of smoke.

I've watched drag racing for quite a few years, there is quite a big difference between loosing traction and a cylinder carking it.

G

Originally posted by GraemeWi

Superchargers are driven off the crankshaft and rob a fair about of power - their main advantage over a turbo is that they produce boost at all revs. On the flip side, they can be noisy, they use belts which need checking and careful maintenance. And cost lots!

Supercharger units themselves don't actually cost that much more than turbos. You can get a Yella Terra roots style blower for around $2000. Even the Vortech centrifugal blowers aren't much more than that for a smallish one. But then you need the manifold mods, the belts, bigger injectors, computer reprogram, water injection, etc, which is why you usually see Commodore (etc) supercharger kits for around $5000-6000 (or more).

The advantage of turbos on our cars is we already have everything there - when upgrading/replacing the turbo (unless the replacement is a huge monster) then we just have to buy the turbo unit itself. We also get a small refund if we manage to sell our old turbos ;)

The main reason why superchargers tend to cost at least a little more than a cheap Garrett turbo is because they're mostly made in America. But compare a Vortech or Powerdyne blower with a HKS or Trust turbo and you might find the superchargers are quite a bit cheaper.

EVOIV - I think the main reason that turbos are more popular than superchargers with performance enthusiasts aside from the cost savings on cars that already have turbos is because you can play with the boost.

If there was an NA car that you wanted to put forced induction on, a turbo would be the way to go for big power gains, although it would generally cost more to do properly than a supercharger.

A supercharger is generally a budget option because they have relatively low boost and drain power from your engine to run (cost more in fuel, less power from same pressure as a turbo). It's more of a "set and forget" mod.

Originally posted by Ronin 09

This should be true, as i understand. GTRs are basically RWD until they detect rear slip (on a dyno there shouldn't be any),...

There is slip at the rear, relative to the front wheels (the fronts are stationary). That's why you have to disable the front drive of a GT-R on a RWD dyno.

Thanks for the info. on the supercharger vs turbocharger. I didn't really know how the supercharger worked..but thanks for the enlightenment, which makes sense why turbos are more common for power upgrades. But I still am a little confused as to why a GTR with 2 wheels spinning on a dyno gives the same reading as the same car with 4 wheels spinning on a 4WD dyno. The physics of it just doesn't make sense? Weird...oh well. Just shows that GTR is king!!! :)

Power is rate of work. If you have 4 wheels spinning on the dyno, you have half the power going to each end as you would if you just had the rears on. Of course you have to throw in a little 4wd drivetrain loss as well if you're running all 4 wheels, but it should work out to be roughly the same.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Place the new daughterboard in the case and mount it using the 3 small black rivets provided, and reconnect the 3 factory ribbon cables to the new board Then, use the 3 piggyback cables from the daughterboard into the factory board on top (there are stand offs in the case to keep them apart. and remember to reconnect the antenna and rear cover fan wires. 1 screw to hold the motherboard in place. Before closing the case, make a hole in the sticker covering a hole in the case and run the cable for the android unit into the plug there. The video forgot this step, so did I, so will you probably. Then redo the 4 screws on back, 2 each top and bottom, 3 each side and put the 2 brackets back on.....all ready to go and not that tricky really.      
    • Onto the android unit. You need to remove the top screen because there is a daughterboard to put inside the case. Each side vent pops out from clips; start at the bottom and carefully remove upwards (use a trim remover tool to avoid breaking anything). Then the lower screen and controls come out, 4 screws, a couple of clips (including 3 flimsy ones at the top) and 3 plugs on the rear. Then the upper screen, 4 screws and a bunch of plugs and she is out. From there, remove the mounting brackets (2 screws each), 4 screws on the rear, 2 screws top and bottom and 3 screws holding in the small plates on each side. When you remove the back cover (tight fit), watch out for the power cable for the fan, I removed it so I could put the back aside. The mainboard is held in by 1 screw in the middle, 1 aerial at the top and 3 ribbon cables. If you've ever done any laptop stuff the ribbon cables are OK to work with, just pop up the retainer and they slide out. If you are not familiar just grab a 12 year old from an iphone factory, they will know how it works The case should now look like this:
    • Switching the console was tricky. First there were 6 screws to remove, and also the little adapter loom and its screws had to come out. Also don't forget to remove the 2 screws holding the central locking receiver. Then there are 4 clips on either side....these were very tight in this case and needed careful persuading with a long flat screw driver....some force required but not enough to break them...this was probably the fiddliest part of the whole job. In my case I needed both the wiring loom and the central locking receiver module to swap across to the new one. That was it for the console, so "assembly is the reverse of disassembly"
    • But first....while I was there, I also swapped across the centre console box for the other style where the AV inputs don't intrude into the (very limited !) space.  Part# was 96926-4GA0A, 284H3-4GA0B, 284H3-4GA0A. (I've already swapped the top 12v socket for a USB bulkhead in this pic, it fit the hole without modification:) Comparison of the 2: Basically to do the console you need to remove the DS and PS side console trim (they slide up and back, held in by clips only) Then remove the back half of the console top trim with the cupholders, pops up, all clips again but be careful at the front as it is pretty flimsy. Then slide the shifter boot down, remove the spring clip, loose it forever somewhere in the car the pull the shift knob off. Remove the tiny plastic piece on DS near "P" and use something thin and long (most screwdrivers won't fit) to push down the interlock and put the shifter down in D for space. There is one screw at the front, then the shifter surround and ashtray lift up. There are 3 or 4 plugs underneath and it is off. Next is the rear cover of the centre console; you need to open the console lid, pop off the trim covering the lid hinge and undo the 2rd screw from the driver's side (the rest all need to come out later so you can do them all now and remove the lid) Then the rear cover unclips (6 clips), start at the top with a trim tool pulling backwards. Once it is off there are 2 screws facing rearwards to remove (need a short phillips for these) and you are done with the rear of the console. There are 4 plugs at the A/V box to unclip Then there are 2 screws at the front of the console, and 2 clips (pull up and back) and the console will come out.
    • So, a bit of a side trip, but one that might be interesting for people with JDM cars and japanese head units. I know @Pac previously posted about a carplay/android auto adapter he installed which used the AUX input, and @V35_Paul put in one of the Tesla style units that replace both screens. The option I went with was a Lsait LLT-YF-VER5.87_2 (https://www.alibaba.com/product-detail/Lsailt-8GB-Android-Multimedia-Interface-for_1601187633672.html). Price was $1,150 for a single unit although they are much cheaper if you are willing to buy 2....$857ea. Make you you get the version 2 not version 1, it is faster and has a better UI - this is the manufacturer listing: http://www.lsailt.com/product/348.html. BTW if you've never bought from Alibaba before, don't be concerned....these guys can't stay in business unless they are responsive, ship fast etc, they were excellent (probably faster shipping than most local places) So, this was my task for a lazy Sat afternoon....looks complex but was all done in a few hours (it probably helps that I had some of it apart before so it was a bit familiar). I also decided to add a HD USB drive recorded at the same time and the unit also supports an aftermarket reverse cam (if you don't want to retain factory) and also AV in and HDMI out It looks much worse than it is, in fact in was genuinely all plug and play (no custom wiring at all). This video was pretty good (skipped a few steps), unfortunately they are an Aussie seller but no longer sell this unit (I guess Carplay/AA adapters are easier to install and much cheaper) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T5hJfYOB8Dg
×
×
  • Create New...