Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

yes i have to agree with you about that

but rotary engines always have a short life span when ported,dowelled etc compared to the rb26 engine with forged pistons and so on.....so when it all adds up having a rotary does cost alot to maintain

Stock to Stock,,,I'd have the GTR (thats only if you are talking about GTR's) Much more reliable,,,,TT Mazda's love eating exhaust manifolds and turbos. Rotary's actually don't have a short life span,,,it's all up to the clown behind the wheel.

Please don't use Bathurst as a comparison,,,Mazda's entry was a full factory effort,,,Nissan's was a private deal. Horsley built a missile being the SP,,,full carbon air intake and a shit-load more.

I'd sell my GTS-T tomorrow for a nice clean RX7SP,,but I'd have to chuck at least 3 grand at it,,,just to make as reliable as a GTR.

Neil.

Hmmm....

I would say the Rx7 is in between the standards of the GTR and GTS-T.

QTR mile- STOCK for STOCK

R33 GTR wins.

I've got a Japanese video with stock Rx7 (either series 6 or 7)and stock R33 GTR doing the quarter mile with proffesional drivers and the GTR whooped its ass.... GTR= 13.030

Rx7= 13.726

Now take into account that an inexperienced driver would launch an rx7 and spin on the spot for about a second or two and that would put the poor bugger even further behind.

As for track. I guess it depends on which track it is. Im guessing the Rx7 *might* win on a very technical course cause its a smaller car.

One of my mates with a stock rotor says they are reliable but another one who used to have a modded rotor disagreed. He thought once you started to work on them things would slowly deteriorate, crack and blow etc.

I reckon both cars are sexy but it comes down to personal taste.

If your asking this because you wanna know what car to buy....GO THE GTR!!!

Originally posted by CroatianR33

One of my mates with a stock rotor says they are reliable but another one who used to have a modded rotor disagreed. He thought once you started to work on them things would slowly deteriorate, crack and blow etc.

Yes, it's the bridgeporting that makes them unreliable. Stick to the stock ports and add a turbo and it'll be as reliable or moreso than a normal engine.

I'm not going to reiterate everything I said in the performance forums thread (go take a look if you're interested), but will respond to a couple of comments here.

(disclaimer: I own a s6 and a r33 - and love them both. I don't have a GTR (and don't need one with the s6) but they are still one of my favourite machines)

* first of all, I keep my skyline because it has a usable back seat and four doors (yes, 4)

* re: GTR vs s6 over 400m. I have plenty of japanese videos too (lots!) and own the best motoring vid where they compare the 95 rx7 vs the GTR. A v-spec beats the rx7 (and, in turn, gets its arse handed to it by a top spec nsx). The rx7 beats the GTO and Supra, among others. The s6 is only beaten by the nsx around the tsukuba circuit (universal testing track in japan). There is a large margin behind these two. I would also like to remind people that the r32 GTR (which is what we should be comparing an early s6 too) also got smashed by the r33 v-spec in a best motoring review. Stock for stock, the JDM s6 is (at least) a match for the 32.

* A s8 rx7 is a serious machine.

* My rx7 weighs 1260kg

* JGTC is not a good comparo (it's like comparing your garden variety commodore to a touring car). For a more realistic (but still very highly modded) comparison - the tsukuba time trials.

current standings:

1. (S) JUN HYPER LEMON Evo 5: 55h976s

2. (S) M Speed Skyline BNR34: 56"372s

3. (S) ATTKD BNR32: 56"751s

4. (S) HKS Evo 7: 56"814s

5. (A) RE Amemiya FD3S: 56"863s

Originally posted by Ryosuke Takahashi

yes i have to agree with you about that  

but rotary engines always have a short life span when ported,dowelled etc compared to the rb26 engine with forged pistons and so on.....so when it all adds up having a rotary does cost alot to maintain

If you work any engine you dramatically shorten it's life to next rebuild.

you are seriously mistaken about your information.

I could afford to run high performance chookers for many years on a students income.

I'm sure those of us with real rotory experience will all disagree with you.

yes i admit i have no experience at all with rotaries but i know a few people who own rotors some which have some work on them

i heard for a rotor when you blow one seal eg oil seal or something i dunno the whole engine is gonna go

i am also a gtr fan btw so don't think i have something against skylines because i just can't afford one atm

I've owned both an R32 GTR and a series 6 rx7 at the same time a few months ago.

I've owned my Rx7 for a number of years. I thought I would change to the very talked about GTR.

It was hard to compair the GTR's engine performance to my Rx7 due the Rx7 being fully decked out with a T4 turbo setup but I made many enquiries to build up the GTR's motor and get after market twin turbo setup. After my research I saw I would be out of pocket a minimum of $35,000 for a mild to high horsepower setup. 2 months later I sold the GTR.

They can keep their 4WD system!

If anyone is interested how much the Rx7 setup cost. It was round $20,000 which included everything.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • just an update to this, poor man pays twice  Tried sanding down the pulleys but it didnt do the trick. Chucked another second hand alternator in the na car which I got for free off my mate and its fixed the squelling. Must have been unlucky with the bearings.    As for my turbo car, I managed to pick up a cwc rb alternator conversion bracket + LS alternator for 250 off marketplace, looked to be in really good nick. Installed it , started the car and its not charging the battery.... ( Im not good with auto elec stuff so im not sure if this was all I needed to do but I verified such by using a multimeter on the battery when the engine was running and I was only getting 12.2v )   I had to modify the earth strap for the new LS alternator , factory earth strap was a 10mm bolt which did not fit the bolt on the LS alternator which was double the size so I cut it off , went to repco bought some ring terminals that fit, crimped it onto the old earth strap and bolted it up to the alternator , started the car and same issue. Ran like shit and was reading 12.2 at the battery.  For a "plug and play" advertised kit thats not very plug and play but alas.  My question is , am I missing something ? Ive been reading that some people recommend upgrading the stock 80 amp alternator fuse to a 140 amp but I dont see how that would stop the alternator charging especially at idle not under load.  Regardless ive pulled it out and am going to get it bench tested by an auto elec tomorrow but it would be handy to know if ive missed something silly or have done something wrong.   
    • My wild guess is that you have popped off an intake pipe....check all of the hoses between the turbo and the throttle for splits or loose clamps.
    • Awesome, thanks for sharing!
    • To provide more specific help, more information is needed. What Android screen? What is its wiring diagram? Does the car's wiring have power at any required BAT and ACC wires, and is the loom's earth good?
    • So, now all you need to do is connect the 2 or 3x 12v feeds into the unit to permanent 12v, ACC 12V and IGN 12V that you can find in the spot behind the stereo, and the earth, and then it will switch on with the car.
×
×
  • Create New...