Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hI GUYS, my uncle and I have recently fitted an Apexi AVC-R to my r32 gts-t. In the etc. menu I have put the correct settings to what car it is etc...

Although my problem is that its boosting more than it should. I have set it to 0.7 bar (11psi) and through testing its reached a max of 0.83 bar and an average of 0.76 bar.

I believe that the duty cycle may need to be set properly. I know that the AVC-R is wired correctly because its showing correct stats on speed, revs, boost etc...

Maybe I have left something out although I can only think its the duty cycle at this point in time.

Thanks

Mark

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/19606-please-help-with-setting-avc-r/
Share on other sites

under boost set your desired boost and in duty cycle, step down one by one % until you reach your desired boost. if it doesn't change, then you've hooked up the solenoid wrong. remember to do the boosting in the same gear.

different gears give different boost levels (not by much tho) so use the gear learning function to keep your boost the same in each gear.

and don't get busted speeding when testing your boost level :)

i have done the sensor check and it seems to be right, although I have one question that maybe effecting it - instead of drilling a hole before the throttle body for one of the hoses for the solaniod valve a mechanic said that it would work the same from the actuator hose (the one ur ment to close off) so thats what we have done, also to avoid drilling a whole in the piping. Is that wrong?

thanks heaps for your help

:D

Which do you mean by actuator hose? Do you mean the one from the return from the BOV? In mine it was blocked off there, and taken from before the throttle side.

There should also be settings to adjust "sharpness" or basically reduce spiking, but i'm not fully familiar with the AVC-R functions so couldn't say definitely. I know in my ProfecB that setting can effect whether it hits an exact boost when u quickly put your foot to the floor or creep up 1-2psi over.

You probably should take it to somebody to specifically dyno tune after the install - as you will also need fuel/air adjustments as well to sort it all. The whole characteristics will have changed, even if you're running similar boost levels.

Hey Gordo, its the actuator hose that goes to the front of the turbo i believe, which is getting intake air anyway thats why the mechanic said it should work rather than drilling a hole in the intake before the throttle body. I feel completely lost after trying to set it for so long i think i give up. Im gonna give it a service next week and a dyno also :D

Do you think Ice will be able to look at it for me?

Do they know about the avc-r?

Is it better to get a service before the dyno or doesn't it matter?

Thanks Gordo

:(

On mine at least, on the cooler piping before it goes into the throttle body there is a nipple (part of the HKS piping) - this goes via hose into the "in" side of my boost solenoid. From there the "out" side goes direct to the actuator.

Depending on how the AVC-R works, it may just need a t-piece into the existing intake->actuator line. Wait a tic.. will check the installation diagram for u.

i will post a pic tonight as i have a new shiny digicam *woot* picture is 1000 stupid words :(

Ice definitely would know about the AVC-R (or VMS, BMT or any other workshop probably) and probably installed 50 or more.. they can tell u what you are doing wrong. If you have time go down there and they'll probably tell u in 5 seconds. They can hook you up with a dyno tune as well.

Service will help if they clean or replace the plugs. New oil, and new fuel filter might make the engine rev a bit more smoothly too... so might be a good idea b4 the dyno.

cheers

I'm looking at the diagram right in front of me.. From what it sounds like, you've got the air line side of things connected up all fine. As long as you got your pressure sensor rigged between the fuel reg and the plenum all should be fine.

Sounds like something else is going on.. anyway, sounds like the BMT guys can sort it out for you.

Thanks heaps Gordo ur a great help mate!!!!

Thanks Jedcoyxiicut if got it ready to be seen by Excess Engineering as they aparently distribute all the apexi stuff, although I will contact you if all fails. Thanks heaps again mate!

Also could you tell me how much it would cost for a basic service and dyno tune?

Thanks again guys :P

Thanks heaps Dr Drift, I'll definetly be comming to u for dyno tunes and services and stuff. I will need a dyno very soon so i will give u a buzz, also thanks for offering to explain the cycles with me as Im very interested with the dyno stuff :D

Talk to you soon Mate

Mark

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...