Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

im jumping on the 34 with loud induction noise bandwagon. i spool like a bitch

K&N pod

That's funny... then wtf, does my friends R34 sound like it's got no suction .. he's got a power FC - could it be this??

A computer isnt going to determine how loud your spooling is. Its got to do with A) the type of filter you have B) how much boost you are running. Also i noticed with mine it increased by putting on a front mount. If your talking about fluttering then you Bov will come into it depending on how tight you have the srew wound.

not just the difference in the turbos? dude i no has rb25 turbo on his rb20 hr31 and made very different induction sound. very similer 2 my mates stockish r33 (no pod).

dont mean that induction sound? but yea just throwin idea round...

Edited by OUTATIME

I think I'll have to clarify slightly... R32s / R34s do have suction sounds... but much much smaller... perhaps this is a feature in R34's to make it more quieter an hence more cruisey... I don't know... but R33's have the Loudest suction sounds... love it or hate it... this is the truth...

love it or hate it... this is the truth...

haha ok. we believe you ;)

seriousy, like 90% of everyones posts, its got to do with what type of pod. exposed/in a box. and how much boost.

wen my r33 had just a panal filter k&n, the induction noise was high pitched @ 12psi

then when i put the aluminum pod on, i got a louder deeper induction sound. sounds like the engine wants to suck in seagals haha.

wen my r33 had just a panal filter k&n, the induction noise was high pitched @ 12psi

then when i put the aluminum pod on, i got a louder deeper induction sound. sounds like the engine wants to suck in seagals haha.

Ha ha ha :D

I just got my stock BOV put be on... and guess what? The induction sounds different now...

my rb20det had gcg highflow turbo, 3" turbo back, HKS Mushroom pod, and no induction noise.

I just put on Front mount, hks ssqv and a plazmaman forward facing plenum, and now even on idle u can hear the bastard sucking air in from outside car with bonnet shut.

ATM getting a 4" intake pipe from stainless... should sound sick mate.

Man my car has the stock box (33)... People have said it sounds like a fugging jet following them!

And I have been in a few 32s/34s... way way less suction noise with pods...

For being nearly stock, my car is a freak!

Man my car has the stock box (33)... People have said it sounds like a fugging jet following them!

And I have been in a few 32s/34s... way way less suction noise with pods...

For being nearly stock, my car is a freak!

Thank you.... this is exactly what I am trying to say!!!

on my old r33 gtst, i had a fair few mods, bigger turbo, injectors, fuel pump, power fc, turbo back exhaust, fmic, bov, pod and now i have an r34 with just a fmic, and pod filter. and the r34 has a louder induction sound, but the spooling on the r33 was alot louder, if that makes sense :S

on my old r33 gtst, i had a fair few mods, bigger turbo, injectors, fuel pump, power fc, turbo back exhaust, fmic, bov, pod and now i have an r34 with just a fmic, and pod filter. and the r34 has a louder induction sound, but the spooling on the r33 was alot louder, if that makes sense :S

Wonder why? I suppose the intention of this thread was to ask everyone (mechanically) why this is the case? :(

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...