Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 41
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

would it be worth getting a powerfc without the controller?

yeah, the hand controller tends to be more of a visual aid then anything. Most tuners just plug in a laptop to tune the powerfc than use the handcontroller. Personally i would spend the extra 200 on the controller, but thats just me cause i like to fiddle with things haha.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/196231-first-dyno-run/#findComment-3512210
Share on other sites

yeah, the hand controller tends to be more of a visual aid then anything. Most tuners just plug in a laptop to tune the powerfc than use the handcontroller. Personally i would spend the extra 200 on the controller, but thats just me cause i like to fiddle with things haha.

the tuner said it's running rich and a few more psi would help that alot,i have a manual boost controller here would it be worth putting that on?

Edited by mjones
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/196231-first-dyno-run/#findComment-3512216
Share on other sites

the tuner said it's running rich and a few more psi would help that alot,i have a manual boost controller here would it be worth putting that on?

thats abit scary... whos your tuner?

you'll notice an increase if you bump up the boost, and its probably the best bang for your buck mod you can do. Although thats not going to help with your afr, the ecu is already running rich and its going to continue overcompensating fuel, ie running rich. The only thing to help you with that is a piggyback like a safc, or a new ecu like powerfc.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/196231-first-dyno-run/#findComment-3513095
Share on other sites

thats abit scary... whos your tuner?

you'll notice an increase if you bump up the boost, and its probably the best bang for your buck mod you can do. Although thats not going to help with your afr, the ecu is already running rich and its going to continue overcompensating fuel, ie running rich. The only thing to help you with that is a piggyback like a safc, or a new ecu like powerfc.

it's not my tuner it was just the guy at carline,which safc would u recomend?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/196231-first-dyno-run/#findComment-3513174
Share on other sites

how far are you wanting to go with you car?

how much power do you want?

what are you using it for?

this will determine what is going to be the best option as terms with cost efficiency for future modifications and your car running at its optimum level.

I remember, i started with a 121rwkw with an auto. Its now manual and will have 300rwkw when it goes on the dyno again.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/196231-first-dyno-run/#findComment-3513216
Share on other sites

post-40676-1196756622_thumb.jpg

see what i mean man, if u compare your graph to mine, s1.5 r33t, with fmic and exhaust.

U ARE DOING PRETTY WELL!!!

*P.S just to add a tag on here man. i have adjusted my fuel prs, now it runs crazily rich and on 8psi. so could i run 12-14psi well?, i used to hit a brick wall/flat spot at 12psi

Edited by r33cruiser
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/196231-first-dyno-run/#findComment-3513234
Share on other sites

post-40676-1196756622_thumb.jpg

see what i mean man, if u compare your graph to mine, s1.5 r33t, with fmic and exhaust.

U ARE DOING PRETTY WELL!!!

*P.S just to add a tag on here man. i have adjusted my fuel prs, now it runs crazily rich and on 8psi. so could i run 12-14psi well?, i used to hit a brick wall/flat spot at 12psi

is that with the standard ecu?if it is how come it dips like that mate?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/196231-first-dyno-run/#findComment-3513243
Share on other sites

yer stock ecu

3" exhaust

monkey warehouse fmic kit

fpr

bosch 040

boost controller on 8psi

pod with shield

nfi why it does that hey. it was my first dyno on a dyno day.

but at time of dyno i had an 02 sensor that was on the way out, and plugs over 1yr old

i think that may be the reason

but changed that now

Edited by r33cruiser
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/196231-first-dyno-run/#findComment-3513255
Share on other sites

this would be my path i would take if you plan to have 200rwkw.

aftermarket ecu. Power fc are one of the most reputable ecus around.

some people have made it to 200rwkw on the standard turbo, but with being a bush bearing with ceramic wheel i wouldn't risk it.

limit on the standard turbo is about 12psi.

Also i would consider updating your injectors as they will get close to running on max duty cycle and also your air flow metre

Turbo- pretty much the best option and to retain standard manifold and not resorting to an externally wastegated turbo would be a GCG highflow turbo being ball bearing and having steel wheels, you can push the boost up to a greater limit then ya standard turbo and will easily hit 200rwkw.

GCG highflows are capable of seeing 260rwkw.

So my opinion if i was in your shoes i would look into

ECU

Split dump - less restriction

injectors

AFM

Highflow turbo

And then possibly blow off valve for better control and no leak.

there you will have 200rwkw and also and then some if you wanted.

Edited by bazr33
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/196231-first-dyno-run/#findComment-3513292
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...