Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I was wondering if anyone's ever removed the EGR valve and blocked its exhaust/intake ports to stop exhaust gasses entering the intake and improving things like fuel vaporisation and burn efficiency? Apparently upto 4% of exhaust gasses can pass through at any one time... (dyno results anyone???) Im assuming charge temperatures would also go up?

I have heard of people blocking the vaccum (i.e. ballbearing) to the EGR to stop it from working but apparently exhaust gasses can still circulate if the spring gate is left open. It also gives the appearance that its not working correctly for those RWCs/pink slips etc.

A small welsch plug would fit the round exhaust port nicely in the intake manifold and with the EGR valve put back on it would look like its operating normally but wouldnt be 'hampering' the engines performance?

Thoughts?

Edited by Jmaac
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/196563-egr-performance-upgrade/
Share on other sites

no need to do this not only is it bad for the environment( not that I'm a greeny) but it is an emissions system and is highly illegal.

The egr will open under cruise conditions unless its blocked open, so at idle and under full throttle it won't let exhuast in. It can bring cylinder temps down as the exhaust gas is cooler than the combustion taking place in the cylinder.

Once the engines warmed up the fuel being sprayed onto the back of the intake valve is plenty of heat to get the fuel vapourised.

the approx 5% of gas thats allowed to enter the cylinder would do little to hamper the engines performance especially when you're not after outright power under cruise conditions.

Just my thoughts on the matter.

cheers

I have seen a motor crack the head due to excessive crank case pressure cuased by somebody just blocking off the EGR valve. Think about it, the gases have to go somewhere. They can build up for a little while, but after a while of constantly flogging it, it's something's going to give.

I have seen a motor crack the head due to excessive crank case pressure cuased by somebody just blocking off the EGR valve. Think about it, the gases have to go somewhere. They can build up for a little while, but after a while of constantly flogging it, it's something's going to give.

You could quiet possibly be mixing up, EGR gear and crankcase ventilation (I.E. PCV circulation)

... I would think the dipstick would pop out, before crankcase pressure cracked a head :woot:

Edited by GeeTR

yeah i think you're thinking of something else man. and the only thing you need to block would be the vacuum line to the diaphragm that controls the EGR or to unplug it if its electrically controlled. I really doubt that exhaust gas will crack a head.

Hmm Matty thats what I was wondering, so if i did block it off it would fill the cylinder better i.e. exhaust gas that wont burn will not occupy unnecessary cylinder volume, and thus improve potential charge mixtures/burn efficiencies/thermal expansion? and slightly faster spool times because of increased heat/exh. gas flow???

So it could potentially improve cruise economy/power? I assume this is the energy robbed by the engine by the pollution gear people talk about?

Give it a try, it may suprise us. If you look at it at its only 5% in each cylinder thats filled with exhaust that won't help the Fuel burn, so therfore the mixture effectively becomes richer and rich mixtures burn quicker which again helps to keep your exhaust valves where they're supposed to be and not melting or lodging themselves in the top of the piston.

There's another thing that makes me wonder. How many people out there when they get there cars dynoed get an exhaust reading before the Catalytic converter. The AFRs measured at the exhaust tip can be out (.3 - .4) when a measure is taken before the converter as the converter uses the oxygen left in the exhaust to carry out its function.

Just something I'd like put out there to get some feed back on.

Cheers

Matt.

For starters im 99.99 sure skylines done have an egr valve (exhaust gas recirculation). If you are talking about the PCV valve, then its only sucking crankcase pressure under vaccum circumstances.

Think about it, its connected to the intake manifold, so when driving around in vaccum (75% of the time for most of us) the valve lets the engine suck all of the gasses out of the engine block and head area, stopping oil leaks through gaskets, and sucking up and burning all of the gases that get past the rings.

Ok, so may not be so good burning up already burnt gasses.

When you go into boost, the valve in the PCV closes, stopping the turbo from pumping up the crankcase to the same pressure as the boost your running. So as soon as you go into boost, the valve closes and none of those gasses get in to the manifold and burnt, thus having no effect on outright power at all.

Exhaust gas recirculation is a cheap nasty way of reducing combustion temperatures that are high enough to create NOx emissions . In certain circumstances it can also help prevent detonation but its probably the worst way to go about it .

80's era EFI systems sometimes resorted to these methods possibly because ULP and Cat converters were not as good as they are today . Also the sophistication of engine management systems with true wide band 02 probes and nock sensors means they have much tighter control over what happens in the combustion chambers .

I also suspect some of the late truly variable VCT systems are programmed to do their own internal EGR thing .

Cheers A .

Thanks, wasn't any particular motor, was just wondering if the increased cylinder fill/inc. temps made much (if any) difference to boosted performance...

Thanks for the help guys

Edited by Jmaac

well on idle its closed, under heavy load its closed, so for people to say it affects performance is probably wrong, the only time it will do that us if the valve is faulty and leaking etc, which can be reasonbly common on older vacuum operated systems, but with the new electronic operated valves with feedback, if you have a problem the engine light will come on to let you know.

i've always wondered if the egr system helps fuel economy or makes it worse during cruise.

you would naturally say worse because of the contaminated/reduced clean air charge, but because you may need to use more throttle opening for the same power/torque output as the same engine without an egr system, wouldn't this actually help reduce pumping losses a little and actually aid economy?

  • 3 years later...

no it doesn't. it has a crankcase ventilation system it also has a charcoal canister (fuel system ventilation) but that's it. no EGR. this thread is a waste of reading.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • LOL.... a good amount of people (not all) on that continent seem to know everything and like to measure things in bananas, football fields, statue of liberties instead of the metric system lol.
    • I assume the modules are similar enough, so if you've had no issues I don't see why I would. I have tried to find a wiring diagram for the FPCM / fuel pump circuit, but I can't find it anywhere. Otherwise, I would just do some wire cutting and joining at the FPCM and give the 12 V supplied to the FPCM directly to the pump instead. If you know anyone that could help with wiring diagrams, I'd be very happy  
    • If it dies, then bypass. The task isn't difficult. I have one running on a standard R32 FPCM. That's after nearly 20 years of it running an 040, which pull substantially more current than the Walbro. They're not the same module, but I'd hope it indicates that the R33 one should be man enough for the job. I think people kill them when putting proper sized pumps on them, not these little toy pumps we're talking about here.
    • Silicone spray won't hurt anything. And if it does, that's an opportunity to put some solid steel spherical bushings in, so you can really learn what suspension noise sounds like, If you're going to try it, just spray one bush at a time, so you can work out which one is actually noisy. My best guess is that if the noise started only since putting the coilovers in, then it is just noise being transmitted up through the top mounts of the struts, and not necessarily "new" noise from bushes. But it's almost impossible to know.
    • Are you saying the 34 is SUV height, and not that we're talking about an SUV here? (because if we're talking about an SUV, you don't fix them. You just replace them when something breaks. Not worth establishing sufficient emotional connection with an SUV to warrant doing any work on one). I wouldn't jack my car up on a short little loop of 10mm steel rod poking out through a hole in the bumper bar, front or rear end. I realise that we're probably not talking about that type of loop at the front, being the one under/behind the bar on a Skyline.... but even for that one, trying to jack up on what amounts to a thin piece of steel, designed purely for withstanding a horizontal tension force, not a vertical compressive force (and so would be prone to buckling/crushing) and, my most particular bitch about it - located RIGHT AT THE EXTREME FRONT OF THE CAR, applying a load up through the radiator support panel, etc, with almost the entire mass of the car cantilevered between there and the rear wheels? Nope. Not doing that. Not on the regular. That structure out there in front of the front crossmember is not designed to carry load in the vertical direction. Not really designed to carry any load at all, really. The chassis rail that the tow point is connected to would be fine loaded in tension, as per towing. Not intended to carry the mass of the whole car, especially loaded all on one rail, with twisting and all sorts of shitty load distribution going on. No, I will happily drive up on some pieces of wood, thanks. That can only happen on driven wheels, and they are at the other end of the car, and this problem does not exist at that end of the car. And even then, I have been known to drive up on at least 1x piece of 2x8 each side at the rear, simply to reduce the amount of jack pumping necessary to get the car up high enough for the jack stands. What really really shits me about Skylines is the lack of decent places for chassis stands at either end of the car. You'd think they'd be designed into the crossmembers.
×
×
  • Create New...