Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 69
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Also RB30/25 costs...

This is an exaggerated example but....to claim that the rebuild cost is only $xxxx and then say "oh but i'm an engine builder and I get labour for free and parts at trade prices" is not really all that useful to the average joe who has to pay consumer prices.

Maybe we should talk about a range of costs.

eg DIY at the low end and "drive in drive out" at the high end

yea.. seems to be common practice to put a rb25 turbo on rb20... but anyway.. yea sorry was a td06.. where i got rx6 from is beyond me hehe. you can compare 2000 for your motor to 10000 for us ppl with rb20's but only you can get it built and goin for 2000 not every one!! and if we could im sure a lot of people would be driving round with 300rwkw rb30/25s with 3037's or some thing..

Im guessing with 220-250rwkws you would definitely be in the hunt for high-low 12s.

Thats assuming the car is well driven and using street rubber & suspension setup. With 250rwkws and the right tyres and suspension i imagine you could even give high-mid 11s a scare.

As for a 2K RB25/30 I guess it comes down to how hard you drive a car, but at $770 with no labour and trade prices, that is still very cheap. I agree that the 2k figure shouldnt be thrown around as a reasonable figure for the RB25/30 engine.

At $770 many of us would only be getting 2nd hand pistons, rods, cheap bearings/rod bolts, basic machining etc, etc. The sort of stuff for the mums VL, not a blokes turbo Skyline who is hoping for over 250rwkws and 7000rpm.

cool hand luke:

im in the same boat as you and also tossing up wat to do and as i havnt heard much from these blokes about detailed facts on different turbo's i doubt u have either.

The bloke is right about the vg30det turbo, thats the one your after coz the turbos off the vg30dett are smaller, and ive been told it is a straight swap, except 4 lil changes in lines.

what i would also want to know is if the rb25 item iproves power by 20kw, wat does the vg30 do? or wat would b expected.

these turbo's arnt expensive (round $350-$500) at all considering u can sell your own turbo for round $200 easy.

cheap 20kw for sumone looking for not spending big.

john

Ok guys i hear where your all coming from. Im just stating what im getting done.

Roy - no offence, but dont comment on sh#t you dont know about. The rebuild is using ACL bearings, its a high quality large workshop here in Adelaide that specialize in rebuilding engines, the standard rb30e pistons are good up to 250 rwkw providing it is tuned well and not detonating. Who the f*k said anything about more than 250kw?

Why dont you concentrate on Cool Hand Luke's question rather than downing someone elses opinion?

Bl4cK32 - Think about what you said in this thread, then what you said about downing someone elses opinion, and how that relates to what people were saying to you. Im pretty sure you will find that they were just expressing theirs, and it seems like you got a very good price for your rebuild.

Anyway, how can i tell the difference between a VG30 Single turbo, and the turbos off the twin turbo engine?

As for a 2K RB25/30 I guess it comes down to how hard you drive a car, but at $770 with no labour and trade prices, that is still very cheap. I agree that the 2k figure shouldnt be thrown around as a reasonable figure for the RB25/30 engine.

You say no offence, none taken because you have misread my post. Your fortunate enough to be getting a good deal, cool, i dont have a problem with that. What have i posted that has offended you?

At $770 many of us would only be getting 2nd hand pistons, rods, cheap bearings/rod bolts, basic machining etc, etc. The sort of stuff for the mums VL, not a blokes turbo Skyline who is hoping for over 250rwkws and 7000rpm.

Read it again... "many of us" im not referring to your car.

And as for who said more then 250kws.

Where now lookin at 260ish rwkw on 15 psi. maybe add a few extra $$ for some parts.

So relax and read what people have posted,

: Deep breathing : calm blue ocean, calm blue ocean,

OK, sorry man. For my case the 260 is an extra $1600 for forged pistons. But since im only going below 250 the std pistons are no prob.

Sorry if I misread the post, but I work the afternoon shift, by the time I get home, Im lucky to walk straight let alone read.

No drama,

Ive also been told that i could safely run 16psi with it as its feeding a 2l not 2.5, and therefore less stress, is this true?

Luke where did you hear this? Ive heard this a few times now and am curious myself. I Cant think why this would be the case,

Compressor flow is a result of shaft speed, and flow into a smaller internal volume could require less flow for a required pressure, is that the rough reasoning?

The RB30E bottom end is 30mm higher than a RB20/25/26.

At the end of the day it really depends on what you are after.

A car with a smooth power curve that allows you to control wheel spin easier or a vertical RB20DET power curve that is extremly difficult to control wheel spin.

To pull 250rwkw out of a RB20DET is a big task as you will soon see when you come to do it.

Besides the point what are we building the cars for?

Street or strip. If its the street then there's an old saying.

"There's no replacement for displacement"

A 200rwkw RB20DET will not accelerate quicker than 200rwkw RB30DET.

The RB30DET has shiet loads more torque and power in the mid range.

If you blow a RB20 or get sick of the lag and want to fit a RB25, look in to the RB30DET.

It works out roughly slightly cheaper and you get better drive-ability and a fresh motor.

If you check out the R33 RB30DET Conversion thread, a bloke has done it in new-zealand. He claims the upgrade is well worth while. The standard turbo now makes full boost around 1500 or 1800rpm I can't remember exactly.

Here's prices from City Dismantlers:

RB30DET Short motor supplied and rebuilt (ACL Bearings): $770.

Add $1600 for forged pistons.

RB25DE (Non VCT) Head: Adelaide Jap Imports $750

+ Water pump, + Thermostat, +Cam Belt.

If you want better rod bolts than Genuine Nissan's well they cost extra. ACL bearings are fine. Do a search in google and see what you come up with. Besides the point for Genuine Nissan bearings that Mathoon has been running in his R33 RB30DET making 320-340rwkw for the last year cost $250 from Nissan.

Not expensive peoples.

I have had quotes for rebuilds that have been extremly expensive. Those places all seem to be the smaller businesses, City Dismantlers are quite large and have good machinery. Better than most small engine rebuilding business have anyhow.

------

If you have the RB20 use the RB20DET inlet plenum, exhaust manifold, RB20 oil pump and CAS on the RB25DE non vct head start it up and drive off on the stock ECU.

If you have the RB25DET (R33) well just rebuild the RB30 short motor for $770 slap forged pistons in if you wish, use the RB25 oil pump and off you go on the stock ecu etc.

It is a rather cheap mod that opens up a world of faster more tractable possibilites, especially when I look at my recipt to say I spent almost $1700 on an Exhaust.

No need to get defensive peoples.

Its simple if you can't mod the car your self or you are not willing to get your hands dirty expect to pay big bucks for a fast car.

There is a bloke that made a post on SAU a little while back that had issues with the 500hp GCG turbo surging. GCG pulled the turbo off and had to go down to a 450hp unit for it to run correctly on the RB20DET. Not sure what other issues there were maybe it was just his car?!?! who knows.. BUT the point is the 450hp unit works the 500hp unit doesn't and may require futher mods to run correctly, what they are I don't have a clue. :)

----------------------------

With regards to running a larger turbo at a higher PSI on a smaller engine here is the theoretical theory:

An RB20DET requires less air at any given RPM compared to a RB25 or VG30 at that same RPM.

What kills ceramic turbo's in street use is shaft RPM.

A larger turbo provides more air flow at a lower shaft RPM speed.

SO... without getting in to it to technically to run a RB20DET at 16psi the shaft RPM will be the same as a RB25 turbo on the RB20 at 14psi. This is just a rough guide. Not exact but gives you some thing you can visualise.

Heat also kills turbo's.. So if you take your RB25 turbo on your R32 running 1.2 bar on the track it may very well Die. drop it down 2psi and it should be safe.

Same goes for the RB20DET turbo. I've been running mine on 1.1 bar or ~16psi since I can remember and it hasn't blown... YET.. :D

Get some heat in to it on the track or some really really hard driving with no break and i'm sure the ceramic will slam in to my cat and stuff that in the process. :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...