Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

was tis deliberately done or missfiring?

cos when i first got the car it was misfiring. and one day a fren was following me from behind and n rev the car around 4000-4500 rpm it misfired. saw a huge cloud of black smoke.

my fren told me there were flames n then the black smoke came out like the clip.

will tis cause any damages to the car?

according to SAU forum n mechanics its the coilpacks but i havent replace it yet.

deliberately... similar to antilag system, helps to reduce lag

  • Replies 86
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

deliberately... similar to antilag system, helps to reduce lag

my car didnt have the antilag system or beeR rev limiter... there was no popping sound just the usual sound when ur car misfirires.

y does tis happens. i did rev the car to the redline though...

my car didnt have the antilag system or beeR rev limiter... there was no popping sound just the usual sound when ur car misfirires.

y does tis happens. i did rev the car to the redline though...

if your car is missfiring... they most likly it will be your coilpacks or maybe try and regap ur plugs down to 0.8 or 0.6

Mine does it under the same conditions too Brockaz, well pops loudly at least, more often than not the fuel gets ignited at the front of the exhaust and I just get a bang with no flame. When it ignites at the back I get a 1-2ft flame apparently :P only makes a small *whop* when it flames though :P

I have been on the receiving end of a Bee*R limiter in the workshop.. 26 in a gts4, was standing on the back left of the car talking to someone when I heard the engine start to rev.. glanced at the exhaust pipe then BANG BANG BANG it hit the Bee*R limiter.. my left ear was ringing for several hours after :D

whats the fuel eco on a tune like that?

Bad.

I don't use the over-run feature much unless I've been hammering it and want to cool temps, so fuel economy is already poor.

Obviously the fuel economy on decel is bad, 200-250kms from a tank if using it regularly.

Can get about 350kms from a tank if I baby it and keep off the throttle on decel.

Bad.

I don't use the over-run feature much unless I've been hammering it and want to cool temps, so fuel economy is already poor.

Obviously the fuel economy on decel is bad, 200-250kms from a tank if using it regularly.

Can get about 350kms from a tank if I baby it and keep off the throttle on decel.

what ecu are you running ?

I would say the stock turbz will be fine with the BeeR limiter. Its more your engine taking punishment if the red line is set higher. Don't take my word for it though, but I don't see how it would damage your turbo.

what ecu are you running ?

Power FC

It's not technically an over-run feature, it's just tuned on de-cel.

Same way mine runs rotational, not technically rotational, but tuned with a fuel cut at 1000rpm and fuel recovery at 900rpm.

I would say the stock turbz will be fine with the BeeR limiter. Its more your engine taking punishment if the red line is set higher. Don't take my word for it though, but I don't see how it would damage your turbo.

DO NOT listen to this.

BeeR limiter will make short work of your turbo. It's an ignition cut rev limiter. Think about what's happening, the ignition is being cut, fuel is still being supplied to the cylinder but not ignited, it travels out the exhaust port and into the turbo where the heat can ignite it.

It's the equivilent of an explosion in your turbo, similar to how antilag works, except the unburnt fuel is not deliberately ignited on its way through the exhaust port.

yer i was guna wait till i upgrade my turbo to a non ceramic item, was just curious as to whether u cud or not as some ppl say yes some ppl say no, best to be on the safe side i guess an not risk it

thanks for the info tho mate :D

Power FC

It's not technically an over-run feature, it's just tuned on de-cel.

Same way mine runs rotational, not technically rotational, but tuned with a fuel cut at 1000rpm and fuel recovery at 900rpm.

cool, im guessing xspeed tuned it, be interested to see how a tune like that would go on my r33. shame you can't change the maps on the pfc unless you have the software and cable. would love to see some vids of it in action ur gtr was already a animal.

cool, im guessing xspeed tuned it, be interested to see how a tune like that would go on my r33. shame you can't change the maps on the pfc unless you have the software and cable. would love to see some vids of it in action ur gtr was already a animal.

cheers mate!

Yeh Ant tuned it, but it came over with the rotational/decel tuned already.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Welp, good to know. Will have to wait awhile until steady hands with drills and taps are available. In other news, these just arrived! I will weigh them for posterity.
    • 100% the factory sender is tapered, that is how it seals (well, that and teflon paste or tape)
    • Thanks folks - I've saved a few links and I'll have to think of potential cable/adapters/buying fittings. First step will be seeing if I can turn the curren abortion of a port into something usable, then get all BSPT'y on it. I did attempt to look at the OEM sender male end to see if it IS tapered because as mentioned you should be able to tell by looking at it... well, I don't know if I can. If I had to guess it looks like *maybe* 0.25 of a mm skinnier at the bottom of the thread compared to where the thread starts. So if it is tapered it's pretty slight - Or all the examples of BSPT vs BSPP are exaggerated for effect in their taper size.
    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
×
×
  • Create New...