Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi Guys,

I'm considering options for a system for a couple of cars at the moment and as part of my research I have been reading posts here and on other forums re quality systems.

Of course I know that sound quality is dependant on the music being listened to and personal preferences.

Now I consider myself as somewhat of an audiophile but doubt that a huge outlay is beneficial when ambient road and car driveline noise is taken into consideration.

I've had some fantastic systems demonstrated to me in cars whilst parked and was hugely impressed but once mobile most of the subtleties were lost to the engine and outside traffic noise.

So my question is if not looking for bragging rites and not interested in buying from boutique audio sellers why wouldn't a basic system provide a good sounding and economical system which will not invite thieves due to some way expensive gear on show.

What I consider a basic system would be something like:

Sony/Pioneer/Kenwood MP3/WMA/CD/aux in RCA out 40wRmsx4 Head unit around $250,

Sony/Pioneer/Kenwood 6.5" 3 or 4 way door & parcel shelf, around $100 per pair,

Sony/Pioneer/Kenwood 12" sub 300watt nom (100watt Rms?) around $100,

Sony/Pioneer/Kenwood 300 Watt Nom (100Watt Rms) sub amp. around $200.

I have put a few systems in such as this but with 6 x 9's in the parcel shelf and the sound has been in my opinion good for the outlay.

I know that you get what you pay for but I want to be realistic and don't consider a 5% improvement for a 150% price difference value for money.

So what do you guys think?

Edited by son's slave
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/199711-quality-level-relevance/
Share on other sites

Hi Guys,

I'm considering options for a system for a couple of cars at the moment and as part of my research I have been reading posts here and on other forums re quality systems.

Of course I know that sound quality is dependant on the music being listened to and personal preferences.

Now I consider myself as somewhat of an audiophile but doubt that a huge outlay is beneficial when ambient road and car driveline noise is taken into consideration.

I've had some fantastic systems demonstrated to me in cars whilst parked and was hugely impressed but once mobile most of the subtleties were lost to the engine and outside traffic noise.

you are correct. a system that sounds amazazing while parked will not sound as good while driving. things like subbass will be drowned out, cancelled by road noise, highs will be affected due to wind, etc. these cars however all have exstensive sound deadening done to them, so these things possibly affecting the sound wont be as large as other cars. you say you want quality, but obviously if you ware worried, and reading on further in your post arent going to "boutique" audio stores, and are only looking at entry/common brands, then any issue wont matter. in your case, all you want is something to listen to. so there isnt much point taking alot of effort worrying about such issues.

So my question is if not looking for bragging rites and not interested in buying from boutique audio sellers why wouldn't a basic system provide a good sounding and economical system which will not invite thieves due to some way expensive gear on show.

a baisc system will provide basic sound. a high end system will have better sound no matter what, even when driving. once again, personal preference at what you need.

What I consider a basic system would be something like:

Sony/Pioneer/Kenwood MP3/WMA/CD/aux in RCA out 40wRmsx4 Head unit around $250,

Sony/Pioneer/Kenwood 6.5" 3 or 4 way door & parcel shelf, around $100 per pair,

Sony/Pioneer/Kenwood 12" sub 300watt nom (100watt Rms?) around $100,

Sony/Pioneer/Kenwood 300 Watt Nom (100Watt Rms) sub amp. around $200.

you need to keep in mind that when a manufacturing puts the power rating on a headunit (40 watt, 50 watt etc) these are not rms ratings. they are max ratings. a headunit will put out 15wrms if youre lucky.

when you say "6.5 inch 3 or 4 way" basically, you are stating that you want to buy a 6.5 inch speaker, with a coaxially mounted tweeter, and one or two extra peices of plastic, moulded in teh vague shape of a speaker. these extra "mini tweeters" dont do anything, except suck in teens who think that having as many speakers in one unit is the best. you are best to look at either a simple 2 way coaxial, or 2 way splits(tweeter is split from mid driver)

id like to suggest a few changes though. personally., id spend about 150-200 ont eh front speakers, and 100 on teh rear. you sit in teh front, not the back, and any passengers can just put up with the slightly, but very unnoticble difference. generally splits in teh front, coxials in the back is a good thing to do.

id also amplify the front speakers. as i said before, the headunit will put out 15wrms, tops. to help overcome road noise etc, and get decent sound, its best to amplify them. what you can do in your case is get a 4 channel amp, have the front speakers running off the first two chans, then bridge 3+4 for the sub. budget about 300 for this, to get a decent thing.

dont forget also to add the cost of a wiring kit ($50) and a sub box, prefab ($100) or make it yourself, which wil cost you the wood, and screws/glue/carpet.

you are correct. a system that sounds amazazing while parked will not sound as good while driving. things like subbass will be drowned out, cancelled by road noise, highs will be affected due to wind, etc. these cars however all have exstensive sound deadening done to them, so these things possibly affecting the sound wont be as large as other cars. you say you want quality, but obviously if you ware worried, and reading on further in your post arent going to "boutique" audio stores, and are only looking at entry/common brands, then any issue wont matter. in your case, all you want is something to listen to. so there isnt much point taking alot of effort worrying about such issues.

a baisc system will provide basic sound. a high end system will have better sound no matter what, even when driving. once again, personal preference at what you need.

you need to keep in mind that when a manufacturing puts the power rating on a headunit (40 watt, 50 watt etc) these are not rms ratings. they are max ratings. a headunit will put out 15wrms if youre lucky.

when you say "6.5 inch 3 or 4 way" basically, you are stating that you want to buy a 6.5 inch speaker, with a coaxially mounted tweeter, and one or two extra peices of plastic, moulded in teh vague shape of a speaker. these extra "mini tweeters" dont do anything, except suck in teens who think that having as many speakers in one unit is the best. you are best to look at either a simple 2 way coaxial, or 2 way splits(tweeter is split from mid driver)

id like to suggest a few changes though. personally., id spend about 150-200 ont eh front speakers, and 100 on teh rear. you sit in teh front, not the back, and any passengers can just put up with the slightly, but very unnoticble difference. generally splits in teh front, coxials in the back is a good thing to do.

id also amplify the front speakers. as i said before, the headunit will put out 15wrms, tops. to help overcome road noise etc, and get decent sound, its best to amplify them. what you can do in your case is get a 4 channel amp, have the front speakers running off the first two chans, then bridge 3+4 for the sub. budget about 300 for this, to get a decent thing.

dont forget also to add the cost of a wiring kit ($50) and a sub box, prefab ($100) or make it yourself, which wil cost you the wood, and screws/glue/carpet.

Thanks for your reply Matt,

I've taken on board all you have said so my plan would be to get a pair of splits for the front, some 2 way co-ax's for the rear and a 4 Ch amp.

Due to change of one car and an additional 2nd car I am putting 2 systems together and I already have Kenwood subs in factory enclosures and two 2 ch amps. (currently used for driving the subs).

So to avoid buying 2 new amps would it be practical to use the current 2 separate amps to drive (1 front splits) and (2 the sub) and then buy another 4 Ch amp for the second car??

And would it be necessary to buy a head unit with RCA stereo plus sub out (3 outputs) or would the front splits be driven from the speaker outputs?

I've also been looking at sound deadening material and it appears quite expensive so keeping my original post in mind would it be economical and beneficial using these basic components?

Thanks.

So to avoid buying 2 new amps would it be practical to use the current 2 separate amps to drive (1 front splits) and (2 the sub) and then buy another 4 Ch amp for the second car??

Indeed it would.

And would it be necessary to buy a head unit with RCA stereo plus sub out (3 outputs) or would the front splits be driven from the speaker outputs?

No thats correct, you would need to buy a headunit that has either 3 outputs, or, some will have only 2, but the 2nd set can be switched between either rear, or subwoofer. Keep this in mind when looking.

I've also been looking at sound deadening material and it appears quite expensive so keeping my original post in mind would it be economical and beneficial using these basic components?

Thanks.

It would provide sound that, given proper installation, would be better than stock. If you find this to be beneficial, then its perfect for your needs, without going to the next step of adding sound deadener.

Just a side note.... Mp3 will severly affect the quality of sound.

CD is best. Always will be. With a new quality set up you will notice many differences in music quality over the years. Most new (06 onwards) releases have great audio range due to the quality of EQ / Compression / expansion and Harmonising tools used in the Sound recording. Now that most music studio's have the capability of recording in HD 96K the sound is just fantastic and shows (even when scaled back to fit the standard 44.1 cd)

I laugh when people spend all this money on a (fully hectic) set up and then start playing an mp3 disc (cause it holds 300 songs bro)!!

just my 2c

Loz

Thanks again for your replies guys,

Would likely be playing CD's most of the time but have a bunch of single MP3 tracks as some albums are not worth buying if there's only 1 or 2 tracks that apeal so for those I have MP3's.

Will do more research!!!!

  • 1 month later...

Dont limit urself to sony/pioneer/kenwood. There are better out there, and i do NOT mean alpine eclipse etc. Try JBL as a brand. They dont do head units, pick up a decent kenwood or sony, but as far as speakers and amps and subs go, they are hard to beat for the money it looks like your willing to spend.

Wander into a store and have a listen, compared to other offerings around the same price. Guarantee youll walk away from the three brands you mentioned.

Also try MTX.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The sodium acetate, mixed with citric acid, doesn't actually buffer each other. Interestingly though, if you used Sodium Acetate, and acetic acid, THAT becomes a buffer solution. Additionally, a weak acid that can attack a metal, is still a weak acid that can attack a metal. If you don't neutralise it, and wash it off, it's going to be able to keep attacking. It works the same way when battery acid dries, get that stuff somewhere, and then it gets wet, and off it goes again breaking things down. There's a reason why people prefer a weak acid, and it's because they want TIME to be able to be on their side. IE, DIY guys are happy to leave some mild steel in vinegar for 24 hours to get mill scale off. However, if you want to do it chemically in industry, you grab the muriatic acid. If you want to do it quicker at home, go for the acetic acid if you don't want muriatic around. At the end of the day, look at the above thumbnail, as it proves what I said in the earlier post, you can clean that fuel tank up all you want with the solution, but the rust that has now been removed was once the metal of the fuel tank. So how thin in spots is your fuel tank getting? If the magazine on the left, is the actual same magazine as on the right, you'll notice it even introduces more holes... Well, rust removal in general actually does that. The fuel tank isn't very thick. So, I'll state again, look to replace the tank, replace the fuel hanger, and pump, work out how the rust and shit is making it past the fuel filter, and getting into the injectors. That is the real problem. If the fuel filter were doing its job, the injectors wouldn't be blocked.
    • Despite having minimal clothing because of the hot weather right now, I did have rubber gloves and safety glasses on just in-case for most of the time. Yes, I was scrubbing with my gloves on before, but brushing with a brush removes the remaining rust. To neutralize, I was thinking distilled water and baking soda, or do you think that would be overkill?
    • You can probably scrub the rust with a toothbrush or something. After you get the rust off flush well with water to neutralize and you will probably want to also use a fuel tank sealer to keep it from rusting again.
    • The sodium citrate solution is designed to buffer the citric acid to keep it from attacking metal quite so much, the guy that came up with that recipe did a ton of testing on how much metal loss occurs over time and it's nothing crazy unless you forget about it for months:   
    • Ohhh I see lol To be honest the main reason why I wanted to start modding is because of a business trip to Japan and Indonesia. I saw many cool and modded cars all throughout in these countries, especially Japan. I myself am of Chinese+Japanese nationality and when living in china (never lived in Japan js my dad side lol) I remember staring at these cars pass by with their loud tacky exhausts and insane wide body kits. And when I went back to Japan, I got even more invested even asking people about their cars and why they modded. Most gave similar answers to what you said but funny enough one guy just said that he saw the need for speed movie being filmed once in Tokyo I think near Shibuya Crossing and got inspired to tune and mod. After that I just started to fantasize on owning a car like that. Also tbh I prefer the R32 over the R34 it's just the R34 is more iconic lol (also apparently better aftermarket support than the R32) and my only goal really is just to make the car mine and make it fun to drive. As much as I love my Cayenne it's pretty bland to drive. Sure the interior is nice and pretty, gives you attention yada yada but I've wanted to experience what it is like to have a car that is truly yours. I suppose thats the goal so far. Haha if you find where I'm from, then sure. Ill help you out on your next "financial decision"
×
×
  • Create New...