Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

This has more than likely been asked before but i am new so please be nice. I just want to know how much boost an internally standard rb20 can take before something goes pop. eg the head gasket. I have a hks turbo currently running 20psi and it seems to be running fine, no knock or detonation. Any feedback appreciated.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/20025-how-much-boost-for-rb-20/
Share on other sites

awesome, thanks for that. I don't want to blow it up just yet hehe. As for the me giving you (roy) $400 for a turbo that just recently cost me 2g. I DONT THINK SO. but thanks anyway: ) It's a gt2530, however it has been modified with a larger compressor cover and wheel, I think gt28 series. Turbine is still standard 2530 so it gets full boost at 3200-3400rpm but has heeeeeeeaps of top end. good fun when crossed up sideways : ) Still yet to be dynoed but am expecting about 210-215kw. Basically the stock injector limit. What have you done to your cefiro meggala? does anyone know if someone out there has stroked an rb20? I am thinking of doing it but want to know if it's worth it first.

the stock injectors limit is 170rwkw btw......have seen more but...

stroking the RB20 isnt worth it, might as well wack a R25 or 26 in for the price, you need RB26 Rods and crank and 86mm pistons (i think like 4AGE pistons, or similar), that will get you a 2.4L but not worth the $$ or effort.

i dont know whats the go with this : "It's a gt2530, however it has been modified with a larger compressor cover and wheel, I think gt28 series." I just dont know why someone would modify the HKS turbo and change the wheels, seems pointless, might as well buy a garrett turbo.

I have seen 220kw from an rb20 with stock injectors. My last dyno it made 190 with fuel probs and fouled plugs. True story! who told you 170kw? I dont know about the turbo either, I didn't modify it. All i can say is it pulls hard, spools up early enough and i'm happy with it's performance. Thanks about the stroker kit advice. I should just buy a GTR instead.

, might as well wack a R25 or 26 in for the price, you need RB26 Rods and crank and 86mm pistons (i think like 4AGE pistons, or similar), that will get you a 2.4L but not worth the $$ or effort.

Fair point, but the 2.4L does have its advantages on paper (i havent been for a ride in an RB24 powered car, so dont know from experience)

If you go RB25 or 26 route you are likely to have an internally factory engine (Nothing wrong with them mind you) You have issues regarding rego and insurance. Require new IC plumbing, tailshafts, general installation wiring dramas. It is still a relatively straight forward job as far as engine transplants go, but there is still all additional work.

Now with the RB24 not only does it bolt all back in with no rego or insurance hasslees as noone need be the wiser. You get the comfort of having a new engine built with internals that will better equip the engine for revs and boost and also likely power. I have seen an RB24 powered R32 GTSt on a DVD that was running 10s with a big ass turbo (T88 or T78???... anyone else seen the car, it was red)

What would be interesting is a how a stock $2500 RB25 with something like a HKS 2835 turbo would compare to an RB24 with the same turbo. Any thoughts ppl?

Do a search for the username TranceformEr on SDU. He was rebuilding his RB24 so has the advantage of having torn apart one that was already built, then finding the parts to re-build.

So in addition to what he can tell you will still need to speak to an engine builder re-machining the block to clear the RB26 crank, accept RB26 bearings etc, etc.

All in all when i did some numbers they were coming out near $7,000, and unfortunately i cant justify that sort of spend even if i had the money.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I drive the Tiguan much harder than the Skyline in all conditions, because it just grips and hooks, unlike the R33 shit box
    • The rain is the best time to push to the edge of the grip limit. Water lubrication reduces the consumption of rubber without reducing the fun. I take pleasure in driving around the outside of numpties in Audis, WRXs, BRZs, etc, because they get all worried in the wet. They warm up faster than the engine oil does.
    • When they're dead cold, and in the wet, they're not very fun. RE003 are alright, they do harden very quickly and turn into literally $50 Pace tyres.
    • Yeah, I thought that Reedy's video was quite good because he compared old and new (as in, well used and quite new) AD09s, with what is generally considered to be the fast Yokohama in this category (ie, sporty road/track tyres) and a tyre that people might be able to use to extend the comparo out into the space of more expensive European tyres, being the Cup 2. No-one would ever agree that the Cup 2 is a poor tyre - many would suggest that it is close to the very top of the category. And, for them all to come out so close to each other, and for the cheaper tyre in the test to do so well against the others, in some cases being even faster, shows that (good, non-linglong) tyres are reaching a plateau in terms of how good they can get, and they're all sitting on that same plateau. Anyway, on the AD08R, AD09, RS4 that I've had on the car in recent years, I've never had a problem in the cold and wet. SA gets down to 0-10°C in winter. Not so often, but it was only 4°C when I got in the car this morning. Once the tyres are warm (ie, after about 2km), you can start to lay into them. I've never aquaplaned or suffered serious off-corner understeer or anything like that in the wet, that I would not have expected to happen with a more normal tyre. I had some RE003s, and they were shit in the dry, shit in the wet, shit everywhere. I would rate the RS4 and AD0x as being more trustworthy in the wet, once the rubber is warm. Bridgestone should be ashamed of the RE003.
    • This is why I gave the disclaimer about how I drive in the wet which I feel is pretty important. I have heard people think RS4's are horrible in the rain, but I have this feeling they must be driving (or attempting to drive) anywhere close to the grip limit. I legitimately drive at the speed limit/below speed the limit 100% of the time in the rain. More than happy to just commute along at 50kmh behind a train of cars in 5th gear etc. I do agree with you with regards to the temp and the 'quality' of the tyre Dose. Most UHP tyres aren't even up to temperature on the road anyway, even when going mad initial D canyon carving. It would be interesting to see a not-up-to-temp UHP tyre compared against a mere... normal...HP tyre at these temperatures. I don't think you're (or me in this case) is actually picking up grip with an RS4/AD09 on the road relative to something like a RE003 because the RS4/AD09 is not up to temp and the RE003 is closer to it's optimal operating window.
×
×
  • Create New...