Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

Anyone know what bolt pattern (eg. m12 x 1.75 etc) r33 GTR brembos use? I was under the impression they use the same bolts as a r33 gtst however they are different! any one got any idea??

And where can I get them??

cheers

Johno

I had this problem when I changed my r32 gtr stock calipers with brembos.   I found the best thing to do was to order them from nissan.   the bolts should be m12x1.5.  you could always check b

 going to the diy center and buying a couple of bolts and try it out..

I think the answer is buried in this thread somewhere.

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/R3...hr-t198151.html

32 and 33 used m12x something. 34 used m14x something wierd. check out the thread anyway

Thanks Duncan, had a look thru the post but couldnt find anything.. I Bought a set of m12x1.5 but they dont fit.. tried to get m12x1.75 but no-one has any.. will try nissan on monday, hopefully they have some :)

thanks again for your help

Cheers

Johno

I don't have the 33 ones handy but aren't they m14? are you sure m12 is right?

nissan probably wont have what you need - but Lee Brothers in North Paramatta has had every bolt I've ever looked for

  • 2 weeks later...

For stuff you cant find at hardware shops try Coventry Fasteners. Eg i got the allen bolts for the ignition coil cover there.

http://www.tef.com.au/coventry/divisions/i...ontacts.htm#nsw

As I was doing a search I came across another thread that confirmed the R32/R33 Brembo bolts are M12x1.5, hope that helps.

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/R3...l&hl=brembo

So this should be the same for installing 32/33GTR Brembos on a 32 GTSt or in my car 32 GTS4?

Sorry for the semi hijacking

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...