Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys i have a small problem with my loan i just got to by a skyline. I wen to sign me contract this sarvo and everything went well but apparently the guy said they want me to close my credit card with commonwealth (the loan being with NAB) he didn't say when i have to close it by or anything else. It's not the end of the world if i have to but i'd rather not. The question im asking is: in my contract it doesn't state anything about having to close my credit card. Do you think NAB will actually check to see if i have closed it if i don't? Are they allowed to make me close it?

Any help would be greatly appreciated

Thanks Guys

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/201496-loan-problems/
Share on other sites

I really don't think he has any 'say' on what cc you have but my guess is he probably wasn't meant to give you the loan with your credit rating. Credit cards are seen as debt even if you don't owe anything on them. If i have a $15000 credit limit on my card and owe $10, when i apply for a loan it will be considered a $15000 debt and hence my loan probably won't be approved. But if he's already approved your loan then i don't see the problem.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/201496-loan-problems/#findComment-3580936
Share on other sites

Yeh thats what i thought i signed the contract and everything today. I even asked him when i have to cancel the card and he just said in a few days when ever i can. So it sounds as if it's not really going to matter if i don't cancel it. I'm just not sure though.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/201496-loan-problems/#findComment-3580972
Share on other sites

Err I may be able to shed some light here as this is my job at one of the major banks (Shall remain nameless)

Firstly - Credit rating is fine otherwise the NAB would have either not given you the loan or told you about the adversity...

Secondly - he has asked you to close the credit card for serviceability reasons, for example our policy dictates that a credit card with a limit of $x will be taken at 3% i.e. $5,000 limit = monthly repayment of $150...

So your expenses might be able to handle the loan on the provision that your credit card is paid out and no longer a debt - does that make sense?

I could almost guarantee they wont check that you have closed the card, they will only find out if you go for further finance.

This is a condition we set to cover ourselves...

Don't hold me to any of this as always its an opinion, albeit a well informed one :D

Good luck with the purchase mate.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/201496-loan-problems/#findComment-3581751
Share on other sites

Thanks heaps Sheriff Wan thats exactly what i was looking for. I reckon i'll just keep it open and if ever they kick up a stink i'll just close it to keep them happy. I remember when i applied he said something exactly what you said about it keeping my monthly expense numbers low. Now i just have to book some tickets to go and buy one.

thanks Guys for the help. :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/201496-loan-problems/#findComment-3583073
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...