Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

For sale I have a 1978 Datsun c210/240k skyline

Its powered by a L24 which was remanufactured 60,000 ago including remachined head and bottom end , it as sinse been rebuilt including new gaskets and macining about 10,000 ago

It as a stock Lsd diff and strong 3speed trans wich we're rebuilt 45,000 ago

The car has been sprayed and registered as black

It makes a few noises as any old car would but runs perfectly and starts first kick every time

Ignition as been converted from a points setup to a MSD electric Dizzy setup

Its running some sort of exaust system which was on the car wen i bought it , not sure wat it is but its farely loud down at low rpm

Carby as been rebuilt around 5,000kz ago gaining it better economy

This car as great turbo/drift potential and is easy to find performance parts as is same motor as 240z

I am asking 850neg and i am located near TTG in SA

send me a message if you are interested and i can email you pictures

I would also consider swap with cash adjustment for r31 ect....

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/203211-fs-sa-rare-c210-skyline/
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I have heard that this car is actually a Mitsubishi Sigma. Please confirm that this is not some kind of sick joke. Do you have a Skyline for sale or not?

By the way, the C210 and the 240K are two completely different cars, and neither came out with a stock LSD.

sorry this is off-topic means13... but looking at your email addy.....do you also have a DR30?? if you do and and in SA bring it out next cruise mine is getting lonely :(

  • 3 weeks later...

by the way things are going i mite be selling my C210 ,

80K with log books but heck knows if the KM are real

shes alright drives smooth as in engine / trans wise /

all she needs done is new tie rod and unbend a rear suspension arm but you mite as well just buy one

reason for selling , don't have the cash to fix it

i would be looking at about $1500 , but any $800 or whatever cash offer would do

pics can be found in the classic section

this is just out of interest if i cant get a job with in the next few weeks.

i bought the car for 2.5K but a few strings of unfortunate events have f*ked it up sigh , i love the car if it wasn't for the rear suspension arm and front tie rod i would never have the thought of selling it

by the way as i stated just out of interest

Edited by Rice_banger

I was the one which saw the sigma , i went there and there was no C210 , only a sigma 2.6 new school , i contacted the OP of the thread to confirm to everyone it was a waste of time / space and he said he lot password

by the way i just hijacked the thread above only out of interest.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...