Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey all,

Do anyone know the size of the standard RS4 S injectors. I am currently running approx 190rwkw with a pfc, trust front mount, full exhaust and 12.5psi

However I am getting injector duty cycles of up to 98%

I have just replaced the fuel pump however was told that the standard pump was working fine ( I replaced it really for future mods) which made no difference.

Are the stagea injectors smaller than others? I was under the impression that the stock turbo would not max out the standard injectors, and it was only until you replaced the turbo that the injectors needed upgrading.

Cheers

Dave

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/205977-s2-rs4-s-injectors/
Share on other sites

You are getting close to max out the injectors. you could get a bit more out of them with a adjustable fuel reg.

At 98% the is no room for error. I would think with prolonged use your engine would have a short life.

The injectors in the neo are 350-370cc, cannot remember, I think they are slightly less than R33 370cc. Quick fix, turn the boost down, short term fix fit fuel reg, long term bigger injectors. I am getting at the moment 185awkw (249hp) with larger turbo, cams and blitz 525cc injectors with approx 68% duty cycle an a very safe tune.

Cheers, I think ill turn down the boost a tad. I have more mods to come soon including a larger turbo and injectors Z32 etc.

Im not going to install a FPR because of the future mods, if I was going to leave the car as it is then I would have one installed.

What sort of turbo are you running and at what boost?

What sort of turbo are you running and at what boost?

Apexi ax53b70-p25 380ps

Tomie type b 260 deg cams

Boost set at 15psi, but not holding to redline, drops back to 12.5. Need to get this sorted and run 17-18psi and a bit more timing. Runs approx 11.7:1 AFR. Tuner was worried about pushing the neo too much.

Eventually the turbo will run out of puff, so maybe upgrade to a GTRs

IF you ever do sell the Apexi turbo, let me know

:blush:

how are you going about fixing the boost drop? mine drops from 16 to 13psi, hopefully the hks actuator fixes it.

Some people on the forum, very limited amount with the apexi are getting around 250rwkw on R33 25's with full mods.

Tuner thinks it is the actuator not holding, so I have been chasing another from another member that blew his turbo running 25psi. They actually have a ceremic exhaust wheel supposedly, but are way stronger than the factory nissan wheels.

It does pull well from 3500rpm. The apexi's are reportedly to have good midrange and the cams help out well

I was hoping to get to the track to see what it would do, but it keeps raining. That is is where the true performance is shown, not by a dyno result.

I saw your dyno sheet, and it looks like you have a lot of boost drop off up top which if correct will see a large power gain.

The tuner spent over an hour playing around and adjusting the boost controller and the actuator, but could not get it right. So hopefully when sorted there will be an extra 20-40kw.

DEATSCHWERKS injectors look the shitz

the ones I got delivered this week are high-flowed 480 to 550cc items

Im sure they would be able to do top feed.

they are in the States, email and ask for david or mike and say Brendan from South Australia referred you.

DEATSCHWERKS injectors look the shitz

the ones I got delivered this week are high-flowed 480 to 550cc items

Im sure they would be able to do top feed.

they are in the States, email and ask for david or mike and say Brendan from South Australia referred you.

I would suggest the Blitz 525cc over the Deatschwerks, as the blitz are new and the same price delievered from greenline and are not reco highflow's. Just my opion.

for sure

I went based on price - and factored in the fact that Im only after 20 more a/rwkw anyway.

they charged me bugger all, around $400 all up (they stuffed up, I wanted custom 450cc items they said have 550cc no extra)

I think ill leave t up to my tuner, I have previously used ~560cc denso injectors in an R33 which were fine for my application. Im building the car for the GTRS at approx 18psi however want a little room to move if I decide to go a bigger turbo again later on down the track.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...