Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

OK, i am finally going to pony up and buy some wheels spefically with the goal of getting the widest rubber under my car as i want to try and squeeze a lap time out of it :cheers:

So i am planning oin running a good quality 8.5" front rim and 9.5" rear rim with 235/40/17 RE55s on the front and 245/40/17s on the rear.

Now the question is that over a single lap, would you expect to see a car running the same tyre and rim width combination, only 18" run a quicker time? Allowing for the fact that the 18" rim/tyre package is bound to be heavier?

My gut feel is there wouldnt be a real difference, only i know of a person with an R33 GTR who changed from R33 gTR rims to R34 GTR rims and dropped over 1.5seconds off his best time. What i cant do is quantify how much of that is the diameter change, just more practice, or the fact he went from 255 to 245 on the 9" wheel????

Ppls thoughts?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/206596-rim-performance-17-vs-18/
Share on other sites

I've got a good video you can watch that might answer your question. It was some best motoring video using an evo which had 'normal' wheels and wheels which were slightly lighter. There wasn't a big difference.

I'll try to get you the video.

I think it was in this video. I tried to look for it on youtube for easier viewing, but I couldn't find it. It's an interesting video.

Edit: It's free to sign up.

Edited by adam-__-

According to this comparo by Option, rigidity is more important than weight.

Not only did it punch out a better absolute lap time, but it was better on the tyres and deformed less so the suspension could do its work better, which means you could probably run more consistent fast laps.

Since I doubt you're going to be doing one-lap dashes and pulling over to let the tyres cool before trying to set another hot lap, consistency might be relevant to your goals.

Assuming the rims are the same type and the rigidity is constant, it boils down to whether the smaller sidewalled tyre on the bigger rim makes enough of a difference.

The smaller rim will have cheaper tyres, of course, which means you can afford to get more laps in to try running a faster time.

If that were the case why doesn't F1 and v8 supercars etc run super low profiles? Or does it have more to do with regulations more than anything?

F1 cars are irrelevant.

V8's run 17" because thats what the regulations say. That started in 1993, so it is an old reg based around old tech. No one else of note goes this small on diameter.

If you take a look at the old super tourers the ran big wheels diameters because their regs said with a flat/no tyre the body work couldn't scape ont he ground.

As for Roy's question. Hmmmm.

I suspect the answer would be yes. The weight thing isn't exactly obvious as the tyres themselves weigh as much as the rims. On the up side you get loads of room for rotors/calipers. On the downside it will probably cost you near on $500 each time you change tyres if you go for 18's rather than 17's. Plus the rims themselves will be more expensive.

Money better spent elsewhere?

Mate, while there would be a tiny difference in lap time if you ran EXACTLY the same lap back to back (which is never going to happen) I'd say in a real world situation it wouldn't make much of a difference. That 1.5sec in the 33gtr (and I know who you are talking about :) ) would be down to the driver having more experience plus perhaps he was trying different suspn settings.

More of a consideration is cost of tyres, maximizing the track and what brake setup you can fit under the rim.

OK, i am finally going to pony up and buy some wheels spefically with the goal of getting the widest rubber under my car as i want to try and squeeze a lap time out of it :D

So i am planning oin running a good quality 8.5" front rim and 9.5" rear rim with 235/40/17 RE55s on the front and 245/40/17s on the rear.

Now the question is that over a single lap, would you expect to see a car running the same tyre and rim width combination, only 18" run a quicker time? Allowing for the fact that the 18" rim/tyre package is bound to be heavier?

My gut feel is there wouldnt be a real difference, only i know of a person with an R33 GTR who changed from R33 gTR rims to R34 GTR rims and dropped over 1.5seconds off his best time. What i cant do is quantify how much of that is the diameter change, just more practice, or the fact he went from 255 to 245 on the 9" wheel????

Ppls thoughts?

If only it were that simple.

On one of the Production Cars we went from 16" to 17" tyres this year. I had to make quite a lot of suspension hardware changes (eg; softer springs) and the geometry was quite different (eg; less camber).

On one of the Improved Production Cars we went for 17" wheels to 16" wheels and it was 0.75 secs faster at OP, without changing anything. Why? Because the compound in the 16" A048 is softer than in the 17".

There is no quick/easy answer here, all I can suggest is that you do your homework on tyre compounds first. Then make sure you have sufficient budget to change at least spring rates and allocate the time to optimise the geometry.

Cheers

Gary

If only it were that simple.

On one of the Production Cars we went from 16" to 17" tyres this year. I had to make quite a lot of suspension hardware changes (eg; softer springs) and the geometry was quite different (eg; less camber).

On one of the Improved Production Cars we went for 17" wheels to 16" wheels and it was 0.75 secs faster at OP, without changing anything. Why? Because the compound in the 16" A048 is softer than in the 17".

There is no quick/easy answer here, all I can suggest is that you do your homework on tyre compounds first. Then make sure you have sufficient budget to change at least spring rates and allocate the time to optimise the geometry.

Cheers

Gary

So could you reasonably say that with 18" rims you would look to less camber & softer springs?

So could you reasonably say that with 18" rims you would look to less camber & softer springs?

Generally speaking, yes, assuming the overall diameter is the same (ie; lower profile tyres are used). Tyres are a spring and less sidewall means less spring (ie; higher rate). So when you increase the tyre's "spring" rate you need to decrease the spring's rate to compensate. Camber is not so straight forward, there is less sidewall to flex, so in a straight line (acceleration or braking) you need less camber to keep the tyre contact patch up. We also tend to run lower tyre pressures with lower profile tyres, which affects the rigidity as well. So, as usual, I let the pyrometer tell me how much camber to run.

Cheers

Gary

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
    • I know I have to get a wheel alignment but until then I just need to bring the rear tyres in a bit they're wearing to the belt on the inside and brand new on the outside edge. I did shorten the arms a bit but got it wrong now after a few klms the Slip and VDC lights come on. I'd just like to get it to a point where I can drive for another week or two before getting an alignment. I've had to pay a lot of other stuff recently so doing it myself is my only option 
    • You just need a wheel alignment after, so just set them to the same as current and drive to the shop. As there are 2 upper links it may also be worth adding adjustable upper front links at the same time; these reduce bump steer when you move the camber (note that setting those correctly takes a lot longer as you have to recheck the camber at each length of the toe arm, through a range of movement, so you could just ignore that unless the handling becomes unpredictable)
×
×
  • Create New...