Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

OK, i am finally going to pony up and buy some wheels spefically with the goal of getting the widest rubber under my car as i want to try and squeeze a lap time out of it :cheers:

So i am planning oin running a good quality 8.5" front rim and 9.5" rear rim with 235/40/17 RE55s on the front and 245/40/17s on the rear.

Now the question is that over a single lap, would you expect to see a car running the same tyre and rim width combination, only 18" run a quicker time? Allowing for the fact that the 18" rim/tyre package is bound to be heavier?

My gut feel is there wouldnt be a real difference, only i know of a person with an R33 GTR who changed from R33 gTR rims to R34 GTR rims and dropped over 1.5seconds off his best time. What i cant do is quantify how much of that is the diameter change, just more practice, or the fact he went from 255 to 245 on the 9" wheel????

Ppls thoughts?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/206596-rim-performance-17-vs-18/
Share on other sites

I've got a good video you can watch that might answer your question. It was some best motoring video using an evo which had 'normal' wheels and wheels which were slightly lighter. There wasn't a big difference.

I'll try to get you the video.

I think it was in this video. I tried to look for it on youtube for easier viewing, but I couldn't find it. It's an interesting video.

Edit: It's free to sign up.

Edited by adam-__-

According to this comparo by Option, rigidity is more important than weight.

Not only did it punch out a better absolute lap time, but it was better on the tyres and deformed less so the suspension could do its work better, which means you could probably run more consistent fast laps.

Since I doubt you're going to be doing one-lap dashes and pulling over to let the tyres cool before trying to set another hot lap, consistency might be relevant to your goals.

Assuming the rims are the same type and the rigidity is constant, it boils down to whether the smaller sidewalled tyre on the bigger rim makes enough of a difference.

The smaller rim will have cheaper tyres, of course, which means you can afford to get more laps in to try running a faster time.

If that were the case why doesn't F1 and v8 supercars etc run super low profiles? Or does it have more to do with regulations more than anything?

F1 cars are irrelevant.

V8's run 17" because thats what the regulations say. That started in 1993, so it is an old reg based around old tech. No one else of note goes this small on diameter.

If you take a look at the old super tourers the ran big wheels diameters because their regs said with a flat/no tyre the body work couldn't scape ont he ground.

As for Roy's question. Hmmmm.

I suspect the answer would be yes. The weight thing isn't exactly obvious as the tyres themselves weigh as much as the rims. On the up side you get loads of room for rotors/calipers. On the downside it will probably cost you near on $500 each time you change tyres if you go for 18's rather than 17's. Plus the rims themselves will be more expensive.

Money better spent elsewhere?

Mate, while there would be a tiny difference in lap time if you ran EXACTLY the same lap back to back (which is never going to happen) I'd say in a real world situation it wouldn't make much of a difference. That 1.5sec in the 33gtr (and I know who you are talking about :) ) would be down to the driver having more experience plus perhaps he was trying different suspn settings.

More of a consideration is cost of tyres, maximizing the track and what brake setup you can fit under the rim.

OK, i am finally going to pony up and buy some wheels spefically with the goal of getting the widest rubber under my car as i want to try and squeeze a lap time out of it :D

So i am planning oin running a good quality 8.5" front rim and 9.5" rear rim with 235/40/17 RE55s on the front and 245/40/17s on the rear.

Now the question is that over a single lap, would you expect to see a car running the same tyre and rim width combination, only 18" run a quicker time? Allowing for the fact that the 18" rim/tyre package is bound to be heavier?

My gut feel is there wouldnt be a real difference, only i know of a person with an R33 GTR who changed from R33 gTR rims to R34 GTR rims and dropped over 1.5seconds off his best time. What i cant do is quantify how much of that is the diameter change, just more practice, or the fact he went from 255 to 245 on the 9" wheel????

Ppls thoughts?

If only it were that simple.

On one of the Production Cars we went from 16" to 17" tyres this year. I had to make quite a lot of suspension hardware changes (eg; softer springs) and the geometry was quite different (eg; less camber).

On one of the Improved Production Cars we went for 17" wheels to 16" wheels and it was 0.75 secs faster at OP, without changing anything. Why? Because the compound in the 16" A048 is softer than in the 17".

There is no quick/easy answer here, all I can suggest is that you do your homework on tyre compounds first. Then make sure you have sufficient budget to change at least spring rates and allocate the time to optimise the geometry.

Cheers

Gary

If only it were that simple.

On one of the Production Cars we went from 16" to 17" tyres this year. I had to make quite a lot of suspension hardware changes (eg; softer springs) and the geometry was quite different (eg; less camber).

On one of the Improved Production Cars we went for 17" wheels to 16" wheels and it was 0.75 secs faster at OP, without changing anything. Why? Because the compound in the 16" A048 is softer than in the 17".

There is no quick/easy answer here, all I can suggest is that you do your homework on tyre compounds first. Then make sure you have sufficient budget to change at least spring rates and allocate the time to optimise the geometry.

Cheers

Gary

So could you reasonably say that with 18" rims you would look to less camber & softer springs?

So could you reasonably say that with 18" rims you would look to less camber & softer springs?

Generally speaking, yes, assuming the overall diameter is the same (ie; lower profile tyres are used). Tyres are a spring and less sidewall means less spring (ie; higher rate). So when you increase the tyre's "spring" rate you need to decrease the spring's rate to compensate. Camber is not so straight forward, there is less sidewall to flex, so in a straight line (acceleration or braking) you need less camber to keep the tyre contact patch up. We also tend to run lower tyre pressures with lower profile tyres, which affects the rigidity as well. So, as usual, I let the pyrometer tell me how much camber to run.

Cheers

Gary

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Update 3: Hi all It's been a while. Quite a lot of things happened in the meantime, among other things the car is (almost) back together and ready to be started again. Things that I fixed or changed: Full turbo removal, fitting back the OEM turbo oil hardlines. Had to do quite a bit of research and parts shopping to get every last piece that I need and make it work with the GT2860 turbos, but it does work and is not hard to do. Proves that the previous owner(s) just did not want to. While I was there I set the preload for the wastegates to 0,9bar to hopefully make it easier for the tuner to hit the 370hp I need for the legal inspections that will follow later on. Boost can always go up if necessary. Fitted a AN10 line from the catch can to the intake hose to make the catchcan and hopefully the cam covers a slight vacuum to have less restrictive oil returns from the head and not have mud build up as harshly in the lines and catch can. Removed the entire front interior just shy of the dashboard itself to clean up some of the absolutely horrendous wiring, (hopefully) fix the bumpy tacho and put in LED bulbs while I was there. Also put in bulbs where there was none before, like the airbag one. I also used that chance to remove the LED rpm gauge on the steering column, which was also wired in absolute horror show fashion. Moved the 4in1 Prosport gauge from sitting in front of the OEM oil pressure gauge to the center console vents, I used a 3D printed vent piece to hold that gauge there. The HKB steering wheel boss was likely on incorrectly as I sometimes noticed the indicator reset being uneven for left vs. right. In the meantime also installed an airbag delete resistor, as one should. Installed Cube Speed premium short shifter. Feels pretty nice, hope it'll work great too when I actually get to drive. Also put on a fancy Dragon Ball shift knob, cause why not. My buddy was kind enough to weld the rust hole in the back, it was basically rusted through in the lowermost corner of the passenger side trunk area where the wheel arch, trunk panel and rear quarter all meet. Obviously there is still a lot of crustiness in various areas but as long as it's not rusted out I'll just treat and isolate the corrosion and pretend it's not there. Also had to put down a new ground wire for the rear subframe as the original one was BARELY there. Probably a bit controversial depending on who you ask about this... but I ended up just covering the crack in the side of the engine block, the one above the oil feed, with JB Weld. I used a generous amount and roughed up the whole area with a Dremel before, so I hope this will hold the coolant where it should be for the foreseeable future. Did a cam cover gasket job as the half moons were a bit leaky, and there too one could see the people who worked on this car before me were absolute tools. The same half moons were probably used like 3 times without even cleaning the old RTV off. Dremeled out the inside of the flange where the turbine housing mates onto the exhaust manifolds so the diameter matches, as the OEM exhaust manifolds are even narrower than the turbine housings as we all know. Even if this doesn't do much, I had them out anyways, so can't harm. Ideally one would port-match both the turbo and the manifold to the gasket size but I really didn't feel up to disassembling the turbine housings. Wrapped turbo outlet dumps in heat wrap band. Will do the frontpipe again as well as now the oil leak which promted me to tear apart half the engine in the first place is hopefully fixed. Fitted an ATI super damper to get rid of the worn old harmonic balancer. Surely one of the easiest and most worth to do mods. But torquing that ARP bolt to spec was a bitch without being able to lock the flywheel. Did some minor adjustments in the ECU tables to change some things I didn't like, like the launch control that was ALWAYS active. Treated rusty spots and surface corrosion on places I could get to and on many spots under the car, not pretty or ideal but good enough for now. Removed the N1 rear spats and the carbon surrounding for the tailpipe to put them back on with new adhesive as the old one was lifting in many spots, not pretty. Took out the passenger rear lamp housing... what do you know. Amateur work screwed me again here as they were glued in hard and removing it took a lot of force, so I broke one of the housing bolts off. And when removing the adhesive from the chassis the paint came right off too. Thankfully all the damaged area won't be visible later, but whoever did the very limited bodywork on this car needs to have their limbs chopped off piece by piece.   Quite a list if I do say so myself, but a lot of time was spent just discovering new shit that is wrong with the car and finding a solution or parts to fix it. My last problem that I now have the headache of dealing with is that the exhaust studs on the turbo outlets are M10x1.25 threaded, but the previous owner already put on regular M10 nuts so the threads are... weird. I only found this out the hard way. So now I will just try if I can in any way fit the front pipe regardless, if not I'll have to redo the studs with the turbos installed. Lesson learned for the future: Redo ALL studs you put your hands on, especially if they are old and the previous owners were inept maniacs. Thanks for reading if you did, will update when the engine runs again. Hope nothing breaks or leaks and I can do a test drive.
    • No those pads are DBA too  but they have colors too. I look at the and imo the green "street" are the best.
    • I’m not sure what happened I told them about sonic tunes free OTS tune and the next the I know .. I was booted..   To funny 
    • Yea - I mean I've seen my fuel pump which is decades old and uh, while I'm not saying this with real knowledge... but I sure get the ick at using anything in the fuel system that produced the state of that pump. Many years ago I went through multiple pumps (and strainers) before I dropped the tank to clean it out with extreme violence. I'm talking the car would do maybe 50km before coming to a halt, which resulted in me cleaning out the filter with some brake cleaner and going on my way. None of my stuff ever looked like what came out of your fuel tank. I don't think I'd be happy with it unless every single component was replaced (or at least checked/cleaned/confirmed to be clean here).
    • I'm not going to recommend an EBC pad. I don't like them. Just about anything else would suit me better. I've been using Intima pads for a while now.
×
×
  • Create New...