Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hi all,

gotta replace the shockies and all in my r33 and will cost a fair bit cos i will be goin for a really decent set.....

so have been looking into coilovers.....but if i go that route i dont want them to be stiff at all...want them to be nice and soft....or just like the standard stiffness of the r33 stock suspension....not much harder.....

so can anyone guide me in the right direction to get the appropriate set for my car?

Thanks heaps

Matt

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/207405-coilovers-which-ones/
Share on other sites

Any reason why you want coilovers but not the stiffness? Wouldnt it be easier/cheaper to go spring and shocks then...?

Atm i am using HKS Hipermax D. THey are pretty good fully adjustable so im sure you could find a setting that would suit you.

Ive also heard alot of cred about tien coilovers... you going to be using your sky for track work?

Edited by br3ndan
Any reason why you want coilovers but not the stiffness? Wouldnt it be easier/cheaper to go spring and shocks then...?

Atm i am using HKS Hipermax D. THey are pretty good fully adjustable so im sure you could find a setting that would suit you.

Ive also heard alot of cred about tien coilovers... you going to be using your sky for track work?

hi mate i would go for tein suspension either tein superstreet or tein flex with edfc so you can adjust the settings in the car.

cheers simon

hsd, jic, isc

all cheap brands that do the trick

if your not going to be using your car for track then you dont need expensive coilovers

as for stiffness thats why you get coilovers that are damper adjustable

theres nothing wrong with those 3 brands,

all hight, camber and damper adjustable

and will handle better then shock and springs\

not sure about skylines

but for silvias there price range is about 1000-1300

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...