Jump to content
SAU Community

Need Help On Turbo Selection Guys

Deceeve

By Deceeve,
in Engines & Forced Induction

 Share

Recommended Posts

Simon-S14 Grand Master

Simon-S14

Posted
Posted

i will happily post dyno charts, getting it re tuned very soon with cam gears, so expect less peak power and more midrange as that is what im after since its a drift car. My tuner and the workshoo which has the dyno is extremely reputable in Adelaide, with what is regarded as the most accurate (read, not happy) dyno in the state.

in no way are figures fudged, and the fact is im not even after peak power... my tuner has the whole time been trying to gain more midrange torque (which was also the idea of cams.. but that was a slight step backwards with stock gears)

in my opinion... the 3071R does everything the 3076 r does.. but spools earlier.ll... it is the best all round turbo. for me it was never about the numbers. but rather the response and torque

Deceeve Rising Star

Deceeve

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Well i'm still doing research still and i guess from what you guys telling i gotta rule out GT2871R.

i mean i'm after both response and torque as well but yet still trying to achieve that power range.

Anyway still left on the priority is the Turbonetics T62-1 Ceramic Ball bearing rated at 600HP with .63 housing. follow by the GT3071R and the GT3582R which i'm quite concern that it will be very laggy.

If only we have a few people running the the T62-1 from Turbonetics with similar mods to mine would be awsome to see the result.

though i might ended up testing it out anyway as it sounded quite promising yet more research for me.

dangerman4 Mentor

dangerman4

Posted
Posted
The reason i'm aiming for that figures is that i'm still running on stock bottom end and i believe that's the safe figures i can push it to for the R33.

I think the GT3582R would offers that power but don't you think with my 2mm head gasket it would be pretty damn laggy?

your miss informed if you think your bottom end will be safe at 300 - 330kws

mine on a good tune broke ringlands at 265kws with the 3071.

on a motor that only had 35k klms .

so what makes you think your motor is any better?

bolt the gt3582 on and when the bottom end lets go then you can change head gasketsto something more sensible

wolverine Grand Master

wolverine

Posted
Posted (edited)
i will happily post dyno charts, getting it re tuned very soon with cam gears, so expect less peak power and more midrange as that is what im after since its a drift car. My tuner and the workshoo which has the dyno is extremely reputable in Adelaide, with what is regarded as the most accurate (read, not happy) dyno in the state.

in no way are figures fudged, and the fact is im not even after peak power... my tuner has the whole time been trying to gain more midrange torque (which was also the idea of cams.. but that was a slight step backwards with stock gears)

in my opinion... the 3071R does everything the 3076 r does.. but spools earlier.ll... it is the best all round turbo. for me it was never about the numbers. but rather the response and torque

simon, i was trying to point out some people make the upper range of the turbo's capability and others make a lower range be it due to skill and care with setup or luck of the draw (with hardware).

great job so far by you and your workshop.

pm sent.

Edited by wolverine

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Duncan
      Replacing Fuel Pressure Regulator

      By Duncan · Posted

      I'm going to slap an old nismo logo sticker on my spare one and sell it to the land of the free for a thousand bucks
    • Duncan
      Replacing Fuel Pressure Regulator

      By Duncan · Posted

      lol, probably should have read further!
    • R32 TT
      33 GTR Broken front wheel knuckle

      By R32 TT · Posted

      Well - they have arrived.  And they are easy on the eye to put it mildly... These only have three bolts - but for a start there is a key that fits with vacuum like precision..  And as you can see by my ruler, the interface is large..   I listened to a podcast on HP Academy about Dan (KiwiCNC) and I'm more than comfortable he knows what he is doing. R35 Bearing assembly should arrive later today so can mock that up for a look. Can't wait to get these on and get some brake pressure logging too. IMG_3860.MP4
    • GTSBoy
      Nismo GT Pro LSD configurations

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      I would be very confident that they are the same parts (the 2 different SKUs). It seems very clear that you can drop the cam in the 2-way opening, or in the other opening. If you arrange it in the other opening in the same way that you see any other 1-way diff, ie, with the flat of the cam up against the 1° side of the opening, then it would work as a 1-way. It can only spread the ramps when driving forwards - cannot spread the ramps on overrun. It would then appear obvious that if you put the cam into the opening "backwards", that you would get the angled flats of the cam working onto the "points" of the 1° side of the opening, which would give you ramp spread in both loading directions. I do wonder if the forward direction of the 1.5-way config is equivalent to the forward direction of the 2-way, seeing as the cams are flipped and the angled surfaces on those would need to be the same on each side - AND - clearly when installed in either the 2-way or 1-1ay configuration they are not intended to work exactly the same (the ramp angles on the 2-way are 10° different between forward and backward, and the ramp doesn't exist in the 1-way config). 'twere me, I think I would rather actually have a set of rings that offered the 2-way with two different sets of ramp angles, say the 55/45 of the existing design and maybe a 45/37.5 combo for a less aggressive effect), AND another set of rings with a dedicated 1.5-way opening and a dedicated 1-way opening. The 1.5-way opening would actually have the steeper angle on the overdrive side that causes it to be less pushy than the forward drive angle, like you see in many other diffs. But really - if this Nismo thing is thought out properly and all those surfaces work on each other the way that they need to, who am I to argue?
    • GTSBoy
      Nismo GT Pro LSD configurations

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      I would be very confident that they are the same parts (the 2 different SKUs). It seems very clear that you can drop the cam in the 2-way opening, or in the other opening. If you arrange it in the other opening in the same way that you see any other 1-way diff, ie, with the flat of the cam up against the 1° side of the opening, then it would work as a 1-way. It can only spread the ramps when driving forwards - cannot spread the ramps on overrun. It would then appear obvious that if you put the cam into the opening "backwards", that you would get the angled flats of the cam working onto the "points" of the 1° side of the opening, which would give you ramp spread in both loading directions. I do wonder if the forward direction of the 1.5-way config is equivalent to the forward direction of the 2-way, seeing as the cams are flipped and the angled surfaces on those would need to be the same on each side - AND - clearly when installed in either the 2-way or 1-1ay configuration they are not intended to work exactly the same (the ramp angles on the 2-way are 10° different between forward and backward, and the ramp doesn't exist in the 1-way config). 'twere me, I think I would rather actually have a set of rings that offered the 2-way with two different sets of ramp angles, say the 55/45 of the existing design and maybe a 45/37.5 combo for a less aggressive effect), AND another set of rings with a dedicated 1.5-way opening and a dedicated 1-way opening. The 1.5-way opening would actually have the steeper angle on the overdrive side that causes it to be less pushy than the forward drive angle, like you see in many other diffs. But really - if this Nismo thing is thought out properly and all those surfaces work on each other the way that they need to, who am I to argue?
×
×
  • Create New...