Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi All

I have a feeling my throwout bearing on my 90 GTR has gone.

Its making a strange noise when being launched, if I even attempt to slip the clutch it sounds like a giant dragging concrete along on the ground.

It can be heard here:

just as the car launchs

I think its the throwout bearing. How do I fix it? Whats required to get the gearbox off? Is it back-yardable at all or would I be better off saving up until I can afford to pay a workshop to do it?

Regards

Ian

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/210098-throwout-bearing-strange-noise/
Share on other sites

if you want to take the gearbox out in the backyard - you're gonna need stands on all 4 corners up as high as possible as well as a sturdy trolley jack to take the weight of the gearbox.

Oh and a second person for sure!!

Good 2-3 hour job, but do-able.

edit: that's for a gtst - no idea how much harder it is for a GTR...

Edited by made_guy

that noise does not sound like throw out to me more of a gearbox noise excessive play quite posiably. if there is a there is a throw out noise best way to test. is have car idling turn off music or what ever u may have going. and listen for any noise's then put your foot on the clutch and hear if any of the noise's go away. foot off the clutch (does it come back)? if so throw out noise lots of cars have some form of throw out noise

My cefiro has the noise above and it could be the input shaft bearing i have been told.

Either that or it is a sub shaft..or something. Does it do this in 4th gear?

true it could also be the input shaft bearing

  • 1 month later...

to be honest, it sound to me like a twinplate. its more than likely just the plates chattering a bit. ive heard/driven many that do it. most of the time its while after the new clutch has bedded in.

Cheers

Jason

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...