Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I am having a particullary odd dilemma. For one i have a R33 Series 2 RB25DET, that when i blew 3 ringlands i decided to build it up. It currently has a RB26 crank, with Forged pistons and rods. It also has the RB26 twin turbo setup installed. For engine management i was going to run the Haltech e6k but opted to run the POWER FC. Its from a RB26 though, and since i have 740cc RB25 inj i need to remove the resistor box, i was told by some people to just remove it all togeather, and some said to just terminate all the ends on the harness from the resistor box. I am completely unsure about what i need to do heh. Any suggestions ? Also since i am using the RB26 power fc, i am not sure if all my sensors are the same as the rb25 namely the Oil pressure sensor, the two coolant temp sensors, i know the IAC is diff bewteen the 25 and 26 but do they use same plugs ? also i need a AIT sensor (air intake temp) does this part exist on another car i could source or can i get away with out running it at all. With those sensors are they the same on the SR or the KA or VG or does anyone have a part number for any of those as in the nissan part i appreciate any help !! here is my project linked from another forum i visit if anyone is interested

http://forums.nicoclub.com/zerothread?id=295315&page=1

please any help even if your sellign those parts let me kno !!!

Well RB25 is high impedance and RB26 is low so youll need to install a resistor box to run the RB25 injectors with the RB26 ECU (I chose to just get 750cc low imp top feeds for my RB25 with 26pfc)

Oil presure and all that is on the lower harness, I wouldnt worry about that, ure putting it into a 240sx by the look of it so all you use it one wire to activate the light in your dash, super simple,

Air temp I used the sensor that PFC D-jetro asks for usage in the SR20 kits, turns out to be a mazda sensor, part number N3A1-18-845, I also ordered the SR20's temp sensor harness so I have the proper plug and all that.

Coolant temp, near all nissan use the same ecu coolant temp sensor, you can keep the one that came on your RB25, but (if you are converting from KA) you can use the KA gauge sensor (the single wire one) for your dash read out so your dash gauge is accurate, well how ever accurate that can be :P

as far as the IAC, thats a tricky one, thats where im at right now, in all honesty it should work plug and play, the actual mechanism is very similar between GTR and GTS-T but I would use a tone tester to verify the pin outs,

R33Paul started on doing a conversion and Mafia finnished it, Unfortunatly Mafia is a pretty busy guy, but if I work it out before he gets a chance to let me know how he worked his IAC I will let you know.

I presume your got a R32/3 GTR pfc? also did you get a D-jetro or the regular one?

its a l jetro that still uses MAFS for a r32/33 gtr, yeah my issue is that i have 740cc inj for a rb25 and i dont wanna have to buy new inj so i was told if i dont use resistor box i would be ok ( i was told the 26 uses low imp and the resistor box makes them low imp, so if i dont run the box i will be high imp) , i am gunna look into that air temp sensor now, so basically, the water temp sensors, oil switch, are from KA, the air temp is mazda, and as far as IAC goes, i know the gtr uses a 4 bolt on compared to the 3 bolt on the rb25, but the rb25 has 2 plugs , how many does the rb26 have ?

What upper harness are you running?

r33 GTR, it sucks cause i dont know where half of the plugs even go so i need to break out toner and mark what each plug is for

When I built my 30 I discovered that the 25 head came with a different coolant temp sensor than the 20/26 (my 20 one was yellow, broke it, put the brown one in from the 25, ran in cold start all the time so nabbed a yellow sensor off a 26 and worked fine), now I don't know if this is a 20/26 & 25 thing, or an R32/R33 thing..

r33 GTR, it sucks cause i dont know where half of the plugs even go so i need to break out toner and mark what each plug is for

Welcome to my world, as far as I know I was the first person to do a euro RHD S14 to RB25 conversion, took me quite some time with the help of many people to work out all the wiring to work like it would from the factory.

First thing, have you got the M63/F4 plug all sorted out and the lower harness prepped?

Lower harness prep:

http://www.rezlo.com/Pages/FSM/Files/RB%20...ex%20Cadiao.doc

M63/F4 info should be around, ive got some RB25 -> S info here:

http://www.rezlo.com/Pages/FSM/Fsm.htm

What you can do is take a pic of your harness and email it to me, ill tell you what plug goes where as best I can, the rest you can back probe the ecu plug to work out where that wire lands up.

Cheers

ok i appreciate it, i got some linked some where hmm

not sure on SAU policy on linking on other forums but here is what i got http://forums.nicoclub.com/zerothread/318574

TTT, anyone got part nums for those sensors , AIT, the 2 water temp ones, and oil pressure, i am going to try the mazda one but a nissan one wont hurt either !!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...