Jump to content
SAU Community

R33 GTS buying

PlATiuM
 Share

Recommended Posts

PlATiuM Mentor

PlATiuM

Posted
Posted

hey what price range sould the r33 series 1 gts and gts-t go for aswell as the series 2, i know the series 2 cost more but if there any difference other than bodykit?

i gotta price on a 94 black r33 gts-t mags, turbo timer, exhuast, sunroof and 96 upgrade kit it's going for 23grand. so i was wondering if its really worth that, and its at a car yard :|

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Shell Grand Master

Shell

Posted
Posted

yes, there are more differences than the bodykit (see the FAQ section :D )

24k seems a bit expensive for a 94 model...but as SKYLINED said it'll be more at a dealership. Have a look some private sales you might find a better deal :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites
sewid Grand Master

sewid

Posted
Posted
Originally posted by PlATiuM

i gotta price on a 94 black r33 gts-t mags, turbo timer, exhuast, sunroof and 96 upgrade kit it's going for 23grand. so i was wondering if its really worth that, and its at a car yard :|

What are they saying the 96 upgrade kit is?

S2 differences are quite numerous. Every time i pull something off the car i find its slightly different to a mates S2. So far I have:

- Turbo differences

- AFM differences

- Airbags passenger, and driver side

- Front bar

- Bonnet

- Headlights

- Grill

- Rear badging

- Different type of plastic used in the dash, more wear resistant

- Factory stereo (S1 had optional CD player but some just had tape decks!)

- S2 rear strut tower brace (is this factory?)

- More im sure.

Basically the S2 just looks a lot better on the road due to the cosmetic upgrades and will probably be in better condition since its newer.

Anyway 23 grand would put you in '95 '96 GTST territory at private sale or importer. Car yards suck and will screw you over at every turn post-sale.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PlATiuM Mentor

PlATiuM

Posted
  • Author
Posted

ok thanks for the help there, i just got slammed by the insurance company im with now, just changing the policy alittle on the lancer go it to 800 a year and i asked them about a skyline they said they wouldent insure me with a turbo until im 25 and a nonturbo would be 5grand a year which i know its sorta around that for a 18 year old but she said its going to be a 5grand excess if u prang it im like :| wtf so some bastard with out insurance smacks me im in for another 5grand loan :| not cool

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • ev1r34
      Rear Main Seal (RMS)

      By ev1r34 · Posted

      What are the torque specs for those 6 bolts on the retainer plate and 4 oil pan bolts? I'm currently tackling this job during an auto to manual conversion... I thought this would a 5 minute job! 
    • Desean Strickland
      Forged piston skirt coating or no coating?

      By Desean Strickland · Posted

      Tryna decide if I should get a skirt coating on my cp 2618 forged pistons that im about to order. Anyone have first hand experience with a forged RB with coated or non coated piston skirts? Is it worth it and does it make much difference? And for people who went with 2618 pistons with no skirt coating how long has your engine lasted? The engine is an rb25/30 and main concern is  that It will be a daily car and will probably see a fair bit of short distance driving, have been told by my machine shop and my tuner that generally a forged engine lasts around 40,000kms before needing a rebuild. Would a skirt coating make much of a difference? cheers 
    • MBS206
      Can anyone shed some insight on this Turbo?

      By MBS206 · Posted

      From now on read it as minus 5 and minus 7 instead of dash, and you're correct...
    • XoRoKu
      R32 GTR fuel gauge not working despite fixing fuel level sender

      By XoRoKu · Posted

      Opened up the cluster to inspect the gauge itself for signs of damage and it looks good. Got curious since that needle doesn't go back to a "neutral" position by itself (it stays in the same position when ignition is off. so I manually moved it to 1/2. Connected it back, turned on the ignition and the needle started moving up! Not sure what's up with that but before that the needle was way down below empty like fully south west. There's always a chance that the needle moved slightly the first time I tried and I didn't notice because of how slowly it moves and how far it was from the markings. I don't know if the current needle position is accurate so I'll fill it up and see where that brings it. I guess I'll try to adjust it manually if it doesn't get to F. Looks like the needle position is relative and not absolute? Thanks all for your help and patience!
    • GTSBoy
      rb20de neo +t conversion - boost pressure sensor needed?

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      You're confusing two different responders and more than one issue. The stock Neo ECU boost sensor is used by the ECU for protection purposes. It is essentially only an overboost sensor. It is not used for determining engine load for fuelling or ignition purposes. That task falls solely to the AFM. Any aftermarket ECU that either has an onboard MAP sensor or a plug in one, will use the MAP sensor as the primary load sensor. Or I should perhaps say "can", rather than "will", because some of them have the option of using other primary load sensors. That MAP sensor is not for the same function as the stock Neo boost sensor. The reason I recommended against a plug and play ECU is that they are intended to run a particular engine and usually in the car that the particular engine came in. So, if you have a transplanted engine in a different car, with some parts of the original missing (such as the boost sensor, for example) and therefore likely non-standardness of the loom and its insertion into the car's loom, then it is very likely that you will run into the same problems with needing to fix up wiring to make it work that you would with the stock ECU. And, if doing so for the stock ECU is enough of an obstacle that you start considering a standalone plugin as a solution, it should become clear that the plugin is quite possibly not the solution you'd hope it to be. It would just lead to more of the same type of problem solving work to get it going. In the above paragraph and in my earlier post, the lack of the boost sensor is not critical. It was just used as an example of something that we knew you did not have right, such that the stock ECU would not work. I took that as an indicator of a reasonable probability that there were other related problems hiding there.
×
×
  • Create New...