Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ok, well the old tellie on the farm has now died, after 20 years of good, solid service, the NEC has no passed on..

So what me and the folks had in mind was to take our current LG widescreen tellie to the farm, along with our LG DVD/VCR combo and buy a new setup for our Perth house...

Now we are looking at getting something good quality, we don't need/want something too flashy, but as long as it will play BluRay and normal DVD's well and also my new PS3 (which I'll be getting soon), now I know I should be looking for something with an inbuilt HD tuner for the HD tellie stations, need something that will do 1080p... See I'm pretty good with PC's but I don't know much about TVs.... What else should I be looking for???

Thanx all! :):cheers:

What size do you want? Anything smaller than 50" 1080p native is a waste on, unless you sit like 1 metre from the tv. The Contrast/Colour/Picture is much more important.

If you want 42" get a plasma, 1080p isn't needed but up to you.

If you want <42" Gotta be an LCD, 1080p is a bit of a waste.

If you want > 42" Then Plasma 1080p...

Panasonic make a decent plasma for a reasonable price.... about 1300 for the 42" 720p one or about 2200 for the 42" 1080p one...

Inbuilt HD tuner or external, up to you, a lot of them come with it in now... One less box and cables to worry about.

As for BluRay, your PS3 will do it, so up to you if you want another separate player.

Everyone will have different opinions, check dtvforum.info if you want to read more.

What size do you want? Anything smaller than 50" 1080p native is a waste on, unless you sit like 1 metre from the tv. The Contrast/Colour/Picture is much more important.

If you want 42" get a plasma, 1080p isn't needed but up to you.

If you want <42" Gotta be an LCD, 1080p is a bit of a waste.

If you want > 42" Then Plasma 1080p...

Panasonic make a decent plasma for a reasonable price.... about 1300 for the 42" 720p one or about 2200 for the 42" 1080p one...

Inbuilt HD tuner or external, up to you, a lot of them come with it in now... One less box and cables to worry about.

As for BluRay, your PS3 will do it, so up to you if you want another separate player.

Everyone will have different opinions, check dtvforum.info if you want to read more.

i agree, my parents have 50" panasonic and the picture is awesome

When looking around at the med-big Plasma and LCD TVs the Pioneer LCDs always look awesome.

You want the TV to connect via HDMI with HDCP compatability. Myself I wouldn't settle for anything less than 1080p no matter what size the screen.

I'm thinking 50 here, as you guys say, no point going much smaller...

However, we do have some constraints, I don't think I could go for anything too 'mega'..

I was looking at Pioneer, my cousin has one and it looks mint!

A Pioneer that size comes with installation. I know someone through work that had 3 installed in their home and one fell off the wall and had to be replaced. Not at their expense ofcourse, the installer would have had a 'please explain' seeing as at the time they were still well over 10k a unit.

yeah i recently bought a 50inch plasma, did all of the work and investigations, read ups, forums the works, value for money is the panasonic 50inch viera (the one i got in the end), Pioneer did have the best quality but you pay considerably more for it.

no other tvs plasma or lcd came close to the viera, i still go to my mates house every so often and watch the footy on his Sony LCD and think what a waste, LCD is not made for fast moving pictures like plasma. Dont get me wrong the LCD when on a normal picture ie watching the getaway show with the host wearing a skimpy bikini while on a bright blue beach LOOKS AMAZING, but when the images need to move quickly there is a lot of 'pixelation'

When your in your local harvey norman/retravision ask them to put on the footy, you be the judge :-)

Save your time and use the time i spent for your benefit, i did my homework and would recommend the panasonic viera 50inch as mentioned, also they do a 42 inch as well should money play a major factor.

Hope that helps

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...