Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ok so ive got an r32GTR with the standard 16x8 +30 with 225/50

and ive just bought a set of rims that are 18x9.5 +25 and from ive read everyone with these size and offset rim has got 255/35's but i was under the impression that with each inch in rim size you go up that you go down 5 series accordingly... as example 16 has 50 standard and 17 has 45 so i assume that 18 would be 40 series? so why does everyone have 18inch rims but have 35 series tyres? whats the go? please explain? wouldnt it put the speedo out?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/212166-what-tyres-do-i-need/
Share on other sites

theres no rule that you go down in series by that much for every inch, although it may appear often.

its the whole rolling diameter that affects the speedo not just the profile of the tyre, use an online tyre size calulator and you can work out the best size for your car.

I thought standard tyres were 55 profile.

As a "rule of thumb" (a very rough guide), you should be running a 35 profile on 18" rims (10 units profile per inch change in wheel diameter). But, as Taleb said, you then need to start checking more definitively as to the exact tyre size that gives the right rolling diameter. But I would start in the 35 profile sizes.

The middle number in tyre measurments represents that tyres aspect ratio, its not a measurment in mm... For example - 265 / 35 R18 = 35% of the tread width (approx 265mm) equals the height of the sidewall, therefore you have to factor in the tyres width and aspect ratio together to get the overall diameter.

If you are changing from a 225 / 50 R16 with an approximate o.d of 631mm to an 18" tyre that needs to be wide enough for a 9.5" rim then your best bet is a 255 / 35 R18 (although it will be a little streched on a 9.5") which will have an o.d of about 653mm, this will help to keep your speedo and gearing as close to factory as possible.

Note: Overall diameters will change from brand to brand, as tyre sizes and o.d's are only comparable within each brand so do some checking before you buy.

I hope this helps :)

oh ok, i understand what you mean..

so what tyre would be best? ive gotten prices for a few, Falken, Kuhmo, and nankang in a 255

so would you suggest i get a 265?

as it is i figured 255 is big enough + i dont want to have to modify the car to fit the rims so im hoping it all works out..

i seen in the other thread that people with 255*35*18 could fit with out mods.. so i hope that works for me..

my other concern is that my car is low..

I would suggest fitting the rim to the car without a tyre on it to see how close it will be to the guard (obviously dont lower the car down onto the ground though :pwned:).

Then if you have enough room go for the 255's because they will be as close to standard overall diameter as you will get, the other benifit will be that the walls will lean inward slightly giving you a bit more clearance.

As for brand of tyres - Federal 595's are a great tyre for the right price (Im a bit bias though), 595's are excellent for dry traction and they arent overly expensive, I use them and have all my friends using them and the only complaint I have had is from a mate of mine who goes drifting - he said that they grip to much ;)

Have a look at www.federaltyres.com.au

yeh true ill do that.. as for the federals what are they worth.. ill have to make some calls,

ive been looking at the falken and kuhmo's..

are the federals good on wear.. and what are they like in the wet?

Shop around, you might find a dealer that will look after you on four tyres, use the dealer locator on the website to find one in your area.

The 595's will normally last for about 20 - 25,000kms but if you look after them theres no reason that you shouldnt get 30,000kms from a set.

As a dry traction tyre the 595's are excellent, in the wet they are not bad either, I find them to be pretty predictable and controllable in the wet and if you dont have a lead foot they will disperse the water pretty well and provide good traction.

:)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You are selling this? I have never bought something from marketplace...i dont know if i trust that enough. And the price is little bit "too" good...
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
    • There is a guy who said he can weld me piping without having to cut chassis, maybe I do that ? Or do I just go reverse flow but isn’t reverse flow very limited once again? 
×
×
  • Create New...