Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

1) without spacers the wheels hit the caliper.

2) i didnt put the wheels or spacers on, and they must be legal since it has passed 2 rwc's with them on.

3) go f**k your self.

1. Wheels are wrong offset, piss the off, piss the spacers off at the same time, and get proper wheels.

2. Cops wont care if you have God himself change the laws of physics to make them safe, spacers are illegal. RWC means shit, my old 180sx was passed twice with a rust hole 18" long under the passenger door, and a 9cm roung role through the floor, does this mean O should have left the 180 on the road in such an unsafe condition??

3, Nah, not as much fun as when I was 13yrs old, it's kinda lost it's edge a little.

Look, I was driving back from Brisbane to Sydney in my 180sx, had recently done a read brake pad change, but the people changing the pads didn't insert the spacers properly.

Guess what, driving back the car was very wiggly, started at Currumbin, got

worse as I was going, but I blamed it on the slipstreaming of trucks I was doing, 100km/h sitting bout 50cm off the back of the trucks, I assumed the wind draft was causing the wiggle.

Anyway, it got very bad, and by Coffs harbour I thought I better check it out. There was an asscociated noise, so I climbefd under, had a look and found a loose tailshaft.

Tightened the bolts on the shaft, had a coffee, and took off to catch up to the trucks.

Got to Nambucca heads, car still swinging and moving in the rear like a mofo, so I pulled over, relieved myself, and coming back notived the rear tire sitting at an angle of about 50 degrees to the car.

Got the torch out (1am in the morning at this stage) and had a closer look, I had 1 bolt, sheared 2 bolts, and the remaining bolt was bent, and the nut had literally fallen off.

Jacked up the rear of the car, removed both wheels, hammered a stud from the other side to give me 2 studs, hammered the bent stud semi-straight, got the wheels back on.

Called NRMA road-side, and got escorted back into the town area, slept in the car, and went to Bridgestone the next morning.

They had a selection of studs, replaced the 3 that needed replacing on the rear with studs that where similar (either the same or longer with the same thread) and replaced the nuts, so I went home with 3 on the effected wheel, 4 on the other side, and the fronts where fine.

Anyway, long story short, because of incorrectly positioned spacers, my wheel came loose, sheared and snapped studs, and I could have almost lost a wheel. Something to note was that before I pulled over due to busting for a piss, I was doing 130km/h, can you imagine the consequences of 130km/h, loosing your rear wheel??? Not focking pretty!!

Now my advise, get new wheels, remove your spacers, and get your car safe. Yes, here is probably other cars on the road that are in worse condition to yours, but you have illegal components causing a very potentially dangerous issue, which has already made it's self known by stuffing 2 of your studs, so rather than bandaid the problem and fix the 2 studs, Resolve the issue perminantly and become safe :thumbsup:

B.

for starters i dont have the money to buy new wheels, if i did i wouldnt been trying to fix the problem, the next best thing is to replace the studs, i know what the problem is and im not about to replace the 2 stripped studs with standard studs so they can strip again, i have ordered 10 longer studs (nobody stocks them and only the fronts have spacers) i know these wheels have been on this car for atleast 4 years without a problem so with longer studs they should last for a few more months.

i know this is not the perfect fix, i would rather get new wheels as im not real happy with these wheels but thats not an option atm so im doing the next best thing.

hay guys sorry i didnt reply earlier. my bad.

i got these long wheel studs from auto 1 they had longer ones for the car in a book they had there.

the guys matched the patterns and they are 74 mm rather than the original 45 mm.

they really good. they are about 13 dollars for one thats the only down side.

sorry no photos for the walk through. sorry.

hope that helps. later

  • 5 years later...

Just changed all my wheel studs to arp wrx upgrade kit on my 32 gtr

Fronts are direct fit but because the studs I chose are 75mm had to remove all the hubs

Rear require drilling out to suit 14.5 mm and to pressed in

Also had rear left wheel come flying off on the highway while doing 110km because some piece of sh@t try to steal my wheels and must of been scared off during the night and been held on by two nuts and they sheard off NOT fun at all to watch the tyre go past you thank god escaped without a scratch and car was fine

  • 2 weeks later...

I also just used ARP WRX studs on my GTS-4 hubs.
Fit straight in, but I used a solid tube with a hole drilled in the middle for the hub to sit on/ stud to sit in, so they pressed in straight. (I was using a hydraulic press rather than the tightening nut procedure).

I have pics somewhere, let me know if you want to see them.

  • 2 months later...

because i have spacers on my front wheels the nuts only bite by about 5mm, have stripped 2 and neeed to replace them, apparently bursons here in vic have standard ones but dont have longer ones.

any one know where to get longer ones?

Mate I enedup getting my studs from Arp the wrx ones and are direct fit on the rear and front are need a slight taper to press them in. If that helps??

Mate I enedup getting my studs from Arp the wrx ones and are direct fit on the rear and front are need a slight taper to press them in. If that helps??

Thanks for the info, but this thread is now over 5yrs old and my skyline is long gone, soon after this thread i ended up with 3 snapped studs on one wheel so bit the bullet and bought new wheels.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
×
×
  • Create New...