Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Am I the only one who thinks this is a bit of a shitty entry list? Come and race similar cars to yours and have a great day in the sun at WSID. If you're not keen to race then come and watch and cheer on the SAU contingent.

As at 4.30pm March 27, 2008 - Pre-Entrants - 10

Class First Name Surname State Make Model

SF Anthony Howell NSW Holden Barina

SR Adrian Hodgson NSW Nissan Skyline

SR Robert Fearn NSW Nissan Skyline

SR Shane Crichton NSW Toyota Cressida

SA Jordan Vlotis NSW Audi RS6

ST Gary Halpin NSW Dtasun 1200 Coupe

ST Rodney Spannenberg NSW Mazda RX7

ST Steve McGirr NSW Mazda Coupe

SM Jim Whitehurst NSW Holden VL Commodore

OSB Dave Gilbert NSW Suzuki GSXR

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/212904-compak-attack/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 114
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Am I the only one who thinks this is a bit of a shitty entry list? Come and race similar cars to yours and have a great day in the sun at WSID. If you're not keen to race then come and watch and cheer on the SAU contingent.

As at 4.30pm March 27, 2008 - Pre-Entrants - 10

Class First Name Surname State Make Model

SF Anthony Howell NSW Holden Barina

SR Adrian Hodgson NSW Nissan Skyline

SR Robert Fearn NSW Nissan Skyline

SR Shane Crichton NSW Toyota Cressida

SA Jordan Vlotis NSW Audi RS6

ST Gary Halpin NSW Dtasun 1200 Coupe

ST Rodney Spannenberg NSW Mazda RX7

ST Steve McGirr NSW Mazda Coupe

SM Jim Whitehurst NSW Holden VL Commodore

OSB Dave Gilbert NSW Suzuki GSXR

no i think its a shitty list too...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/212904-compak-attack/#findComment-3760849
Share on other sites

Real Name: Jordan Vlotis

Known Username(s): DESCR8, TIKUF, GR8NES, MR_RB, Skyline95, GTR_Junkie, NissanFreak, BlownNboosted, CRACKD, RB Engineering, quick500

Names Used: Jordan Vlotis, George Vlotis, Kirrin Vlotis, 'Joe', 'Joe Savva', Nathan Vlotis, Nathan Arthur, Sam, Jerry

Active on these forums: Skylines Australia, Calais Turbo, GTROUK, SDU, OzAudi.com

Email: [email protected]

Email: [email protected]

Email: [email protected]

Email: [email protected]

Email: [email protected]

Email: [email protected]

Email: [email protected]

Email: [email protected]

Email: [email protected]

Email: [email protected]

Email: [email protected]

Mobile: 0424 519 298

Mobile: 0419 818 795

Mobile: 0424 995 627

Drivers Licence No: 12808522

Bank Details: Bank: St. George Bank, Account No: 1372932043, BSB: 112 879

Bank Details: Bank: CBA, Account No: 028014668 , BSB: 062-105

Bank Details: Bank: ?, Account No: 010323375 , BSB: 062-128

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/212904-compak-attack/#findComment-3763207
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The values for HID colour are also defined ~ see https://www.legislation.gov.au/F2006L02732/latest/text  ~ goto section 3.9 onwards ....
    • So, if the headlights' cutoff behaviour (angles, heights, etc) are not as per 6.2.6.1.1 without automatic levelling, then you have to have to have automatic** levelling. Also, if the headlight does not have the required markings, then neither automatic nor manual adjusters are going to be acceptable. That's because the base headlight itself does not meet the minimum requirement (which is the marking). ** with the option of manual levelling, if the headlight otherwise meets the same requirements as for the automatic case AND can be set to the "base" alignment at the headlight itself. So that's an additional requirement for the manual case. So, provided that the marking is on the headlight and there is a local manual adjustment back to "base" on the headlight, then yes, you could argue that they are code compliant. But if you are missing any single one of these things, then they are not. And unlike certain other standards that I work with, there does not seem to be scope to prepare a "fitness for purpose" report. Well, I guess there actually is. You might engage an automotive engineer to write a report stating that the lights meet the performance requirements of the standard even if they are missing, for example, the markings.  
    • Vertical orientation   6.2.6.1.1. The initial downward inclination of the cut off of the dipped-beam to be set in the unladen vehicle state with one person in the driver's seat shall be specified within an accuracy of 0.1 per cent by the manufacturer and indicated in a clearly legible and indelible manner on each vehicle close to either headlamp or the manufacturer's plate by the symbol shown in Annex 7.   The value of this indicated downward inclination shall be defined in accordance with paragraph 6.2.6.1.2.   6.2.6.1.2. Depending on the mounting height in metres (h) of the lower edge of the apparent surface in the direction of the reference axis of the dipped beam headlamp, measured on the unladen vehicles, the vertical inclination of the cut off of the dipped- beam shall, under all the static conditions of Annex 5, remain between the following limits and the initial aiming shall have the following values:   h < 0.8   Limits: between 0.5 per cent and 2.5 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.0 per cent and 1.5 per cent   0.8 < h < 1.0   Limits: between 0.5 per cent and 2.5 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.0 per cent and 1.5 per cent   Or, at the discretion of the manufacturer,   Limits: between 1.0 per cent and 3.0 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.5 per cent and 2.0 per cent   The application for the vehicle type approval shall, in this case, contain information as to which of the two alternatives is to be used.   h > 1.0   Limits: between 1.0 per cent and 3.0 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.5 per cent and 2.0 per cent   The above limits and the initial aiming values are summarized in the diagram below.   For category N3G (off-road) vehicles where the headlamps exceed a height of 1,200 mm, the limits for the vertical inclination of the cut-off shall be between: -1.5 per cent and -3.5 per cent.   The initial aim shall be set between: -2 per cent and -2.5 per cent.
×
×
  • Create New...