Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey guys, just went to WSID and was happy with the time i pulled 13.75 with only a cat back and 10 psi boost...HOWEVER, the last run i shifted from 3rd gear redline into 2nd gear, would this of damaged my car engine (such as pistons working too hard?) or would the rev limiter cut it off even if u shifted from 3rd to 2nd???

wat are the possible damages i coulda done??? cuz my car runs alright but just paranoid man

  • Replies 54
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

hey i saw your car! i wasnt competing, but i would like to in a few weeks, 16th methinks.

didnt see the mis-shift, and im no techhead but i have heard it can do all kinds of things such as valve-bounce, the piston coming up and smashing into the valve. of course that is just heresay, if its running fine i shouldnt be too concerned.

not like that poor bmw that got towed. or whatever it was that shat its guts up the end and delayed proceedings.

ill race you if i see you there again. mind you im expecting mid 12s with a 230-240rwkw R33. :D

if u shifted to second from 3rd wen u were on the limiter id be more concerned about ur gbox and driveline hence a massive compression lock usually... but if u had sticky tyres well i dont know but i wouldnt have thought it would have affected ur engine much cept for pinging of limiter

yep the gearbox is actually quite fine imo...

i didn't have sticky tyres, i only had some low profile "roadster" tyres at rear...and wat do u exactly mean by driveline issues?

i shoulda mentioned before, i did smell something badly right after it happened whether its the clutch or brake pads i don't know but there was no smoke or bang noises...

but the thing is i thought the rev limiter woulda cut it off so i woulda been safe? or am i just lucky the pistons didn't fly out?

well the way i figure it, if you let the clutch right out, there is nothing stopping the engine from doing say 10000rpm. the rev limiter wont prevent this, it only cuts the spark (or fuel?) in an attempt to drop the revs. remember, if the tyres are going 150kmh, this speed is transferred through the drivetrain, and then to the engine. in 2nd this would = 10500rpm.

this normally results in compression skid, where the tyres lock up, or the engine doing 10000rpm momentarily lol.

i shoulda mentioned before, i did smell something badly right after it happened whether its the clutch or brake pads i don't know but there was no smoke or bang noises...

hopefully that was your clutch slipping. best possible result! burnt clutch smells like shit, i daresay thats what it was. :D

oh alright thanks ALOT GUYS! just bloody paranoid after that....

but yeah like u said the tyres did lock up and made me skid~! so does that mean the rev wouldn't of gotten to 10000rpm? or it still would have and kinda stuffed up my pistons u reckon?

oh yeah another thing is, when i tried to step on it on 2nd gear after i mis-shifted, the rev went up as if the clutch was slipping, i thought that was the rev limiter kicking in? or is it really just a clutch slip?

Edited by R33Turbo
but yeah like u said the tyres did lock up and made me skid~! so does that mean the rev wouldn't of gotten to 10000rpm? or it still would have and kinda stuffed up my pistons u reckon?

oh yeah another thing is, when i tried to step on it on 2nd gear after i mis-shifted, the rev went up as if the clutch was slipping, i thought that was the rev limiter kicking in? or is it really just a clutch slip?

yes the revs probably did get up to 9-10000. i think its worse for your valves than your pistons, but if something let go it would probably have happened instantly and been catastrophic. so dont do it again lol.

revs going up, but not speed, is generally a good sign of clutch slip.

why don't you give it another run? because if the valves did bend due to the mis shift then wouldn't the performance be affected in a bad way ? or maybe not? can someone correct me on this?

thanks for the input guys. well im taking it in for a compression test tomorrow to make sure, but apparently to find out for sure i need to pull apart the head

*sigh* shouldn't of went to WSID tonight

Edited by R33Turbo

SoSK did similar, 4th to 3rd instead of 5th. Result 12 bent exchaust valves, no compression, engine no run. If the engine still runs OK, then chances are you got away with it, consider yourself very lucky. A leak down test will confirm that everything is OK.

Cheers

Gary

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...