Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I'm getting my RB25DE (Non VCT) Head sent in to be reconditioned as soon as I make my mind up if I should get a little bit of work done to it.

I've been told that the most befinitial work is the first stage of work that is relatively cheap ($300). This cleans up the area around where the valves are to make it flow a bit smoother.

When performing head work it obviously increases the amount of flow and reduces the restriction.

SO.. would it be correct to assume that you could make as much power with slightly less boost as boost is a restriction to the flow of air?!?!?

Yep Joel, plus the turbo will come onto boost earlier (lower rpm) and faster. Off boost performance will increase as well and fuel economy will improve (unless you use the extra power of course).

Thaaaankyou.. :) Just what I wanted to hear.

I'm getting Chris Milton Engineering to do the work as he was one of the nicest blokes to talk to and gave me 1 hr of his time explaining a little about heads and previous jobs they have done regarding the RB25/30 conversions etc.. :)

He said it is worth while working on both the inlet and exhaust ports around the valve area.

He also said that Port matching is mainly used on the older Dinosaur engines and wouldn't be required on the RB unless you are after every little bit of power.

Hence $$ to Performance ratio is bad. :P

Its amasing how many people actually bagged the Jap import motor, one bloke even stating that if it were up to him all of the Jap cars would be sitting at the wreckers.

Thanx Again Gary.. :D

Hi Joel, whilst the standard Nissan stuff is pretty good (not perfect), I have seen some pretty average port alignment with aftermarket manifolds (both inlet and exhaust). They just don't line up properly and I reckon this may be the reason why some people get bad results from expensive bolt on manifolds.

I always check the alignement of the head, gaskets and manifolds, and in 5 out of 10 cases I have to get out the die grinder to tidy them up.

The ice age caught up with the dinosaurs and they are extinct, some people just don't know it yet.

Joel,

I reckon i am neck to neck with you on your RB30/25 build!

i am dropping my heads off next wednesday (payday) at a place in melbourne to get built.

I have a couple of questions for you:

1. Are you replacing the factory RB25 valve springs with harder items?

2. how much are you spending on a complete end to end process? (for me including springs etc, i am puttting aside 1K?. should be getting some change)

3. what components of your head are you getting built? (re-seated?, new guides?, etc)

thanks Joel/sydneykid,

Trev,

Hello Sydneykid.

What is your approach port matching ? I have done it a couple of times, and have my own method, although it is a fair bit of work.

What I do is very carefully make a sheet metal template that just slides onto the manifold studs, and with a die grinder, match the metal template to the head ports. I then transfer the template to the inlet manifold, and remove minimum material from both, so template and manifold match exactly.

Then go back and check the head again. Eventually the metal template matches both exactly, so in theory the manifold should then match the head as well with a very smooth transition.

I am in the process of rebuilding and upgrading my flow-bench at the moment, and find all this particularly fascinating.

JNR.. Including a VRS kit the whole lot is costing around 1k.

I'm using the standard valve springs as it won't be reving super high so they don't need to be changed.

I'll ask Chris about valve springs when I drop the head off.

Although he didn't mention it so I gather the standards are fine.

I dont know exactly, they told me that they didnt like quoting without seeing the car????

He just picked up a price sheet from another job and said it will be $1500 to remove the head, disassemble the head, mild port, reseat the valves (which he said had to be done because they couldnt guarantee they would seat after they had been in the port with a dremel tool) and to reassemble and fit.

I was under the impression that it would cost about $3-400 to remove and replace a head, and if the port is $300, then that is $8-900 to strip the head, do valves and refurbish. Not IMHO very good value.

EDIT: and that price included me providing a head gasket.

Yer I wasn't going to worry about porting as it really isn't that necessary.

The biggest restriction is apparently around where the valves are so that is what he recommended I do first.

Call it Stage 1 if you like.

I was quoted ~$400 for the head recondition including putting it all back together and then $300 for the head work.

I was quoted to replace a head gasket a while back steve and it was in the vicinity of $600+

Originally posted by -Joel-

Yer I wasn't going to worry about porting as it really isn't that necessary.

The biggest restriction is apparently around where the valves are so that is what he recommended I do first.

Call it Stage 1 if you like.

I was quoted ~$400 for the head recondition including putting it all back together and then $300 for the head work.

I was quoted to replace a head gasket a while back steve and it was in the vicinity of $600+

Well I didnt want the head recoed, but anyway using your figures $400 + $300 + $600 = $1300 LESS the cost of head gasket which are around $150odd, so should be 1150 not 1500. Why is it that they quote me $350 more than you? And that was a rough quote, he said it could be more.

Yer not sure Steve.. ?!? So that $1500 was supplying the VRS Kit?

A VRS kit for me is $265 that comes with all the rocker cover gastets, cam gaskets i think it was?!, Head gasket, inlet manifold gasket, exhaust gasket, valve stem seals etc..

If you just want to buy the valve stem seals they cost $330 which. If you were to pull the head off you would want to do the valve stem seals obviously anyway.

He didnt say.

Was a bit vague/cagey about giving out info. Just kept saying that he couldnt really say how much it would cost me, I'd have to bring the car in.

I got the impression that he didnt have much to do with headwork, or just didnt want to answer my questions.

dont know the name of the guy I spoke to...ah well, might just stick with AED:) Only that way I gotta remove the head myself:(

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Does that German restaurant still exist in the old place out the NW end of Goulburn? When I say "out the NW end of"...I am really being vague. It was 1997 when I was last there, and the only point of reference I can recall is that it was on the opposite side of the main drag from the big merino. And when I say "opposite side of the main drag", I don't mean "on the main drag". It was either a couple of streets back from there, or might have even been out in the sticks a bit further. Was an old farm building or mill or somesuch. And when I say "the big merino" I might actually be thinking of a completely different part of town, because I just looked on maps and the big bugger is not where I remembered him to be! The food was good, consisting largely of various German mystery-meat sausage/loaf things and kartofflen.
    • So while the second sentence is completely correct and the whole point of the conversation, the first sentence bears consideration. If this bloke is just hoping to throw big turbos on and drive it around, because there are no helpful facilities at all in his tropical paradise** then he likely has zero chance of even knowing what the TP is on the last column in the stock maps, let alone know whether the ECU is operating anywhere near it or past it. So the point is very very moot. And, per what I said before, at stock boost on those turbos, you may well be off the end of the map. **I'm just back from Vanuatu, so I know exactly what small Pacific nations can be like wrt paradise without requisite facilities. But it's not even that simple. I put a high flow on my car and had to drive it around with a proper tune because of the lack of opportunity*** to put the bigger AFM and injectors into it to allow it to be tuned. I had to turn the boost down to less than I had before, and back off the boost controller's ramp, because it was exploring parts of the map that it didn't drive in before, and really couldn't access for tuning on the dyno either, and so was pinging. It was still well within the last column, because when I first**** set up the Nistune on the Neo I rescaled all axes of the maps to give some more space to explore. ***Family dyno was broken ****This was 13 years ago, and the TIM thing wasn't a thing then and so TP would definitely grow when pushing past the stock tune's limits.
    • Yep, this bit another local owner. I caught it before putting the transmission back into the car, what I noticed was the pressure plate fingers weren't flat and even. It's more obvious with the pull style clutch because the throwout bearing ring was visibly not flat once everything is put together. Nismo should really update their instructions to call out this specific detail. I'm not even sure the clutch as-shipped orients everything properly.
    • It ended up being that orientation of the float hub in relation to the clutch disk, when I installed it, I heard a loud click and being stupid, I decided to not take it a part and check it. The hub didn't properly align with the clutch disk and was causing the issue. Definitely an odd one! Dahtone Racing was able to fix me right up, stand up blokes!      
    • Right, but I'm saying on the stock ECU measured airmass from the MAF is no higher than stock. So it's accounting for the higher flow rate iso-manifold pressure. You just have to keep turning down the boost until you're within the stock tune's load scale. If you run off the end there's no telling what will happen. This does mean there's zero benefit to the turbos you're running vs stock, if anything it's just a straight downgrade because the transient response is worse, you don't even get the ECU's boost solenoid helping to pull the wastegate closed during initial spool, and peak power is only whatever the factory map can give you before you hit the R&R corner. On a -9 I would bet that you would have to change out the wastegate spring once you have a real ECU and you're tuning it for real. I'm not saying this is a remotely ideal state of affairs, it's just a way to keep it driveable until you can get a proper tune done.
×
×
  • Create New...