Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

NS is back on now!

Im thinking it was someone who was pissed off about NS expanding and becoming hardtuned, and having a section "GTR owners club (GTROC)." Maybe they thought it was trying to muscle in on SAU?

They are basically trying to muscle in on every major car forum, I'm not surprised there are a few people who would be a little peeved off. Although the hacker is from SAU, then it's giving us a pretty bad name.

But hey, when money calls, you gotta answer regardless of who you piss off.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/214009-nscom-haxored/#findComment-3778895
Share on other sites

They are basically trying to muscle in on every major car forum, I'm not surprised there are a few people who would be a little peeved off. Although the hacker is from SAU, then it's giving us a pretty bad name.

But hey, when money calls, you gotta answer regardless of who you piss off.

I dont think many people are going to take it to seriously (except loz i assume).

OMGZ FORUM WARZZZ!!!11one

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/214009-nscom-haxored/#findComment-3778906
Share on other sites

I think most of these forums aren't worried as hey have their own little group they are comfortable and won't deviate regardless. I mean, you are not going to go to hardtuned for serious advice on rotary advice would you?

But some one out there sure is pissed off.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/214009-nscom-haxored/#findComment-3778921
Share on other sites

vs.jpg

Pre-match specs:

SAU:

Currently:

147 guests, 365 members, 11 anonymous members

Overall:

Our members have made a total of 3,718,974 posts

We have 39,990 registered members

Most users ever online was 900 on 25 May 2006, 04:14 PM

NS:

Currently:

286 guests, 188 members, 3 anonymous members

Overall:

Our members have made a total of 1,754,372 posts

We have 38,882 registered members

Most users ever online was 624 on Mar 3 2008, 07:53 PM

Edited by gravy
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/214009-nscom-haxored/#findComment-3779359
Share on other sites

lol

oh noes forums warzzzz!?!?!1?!?!1ty

I dont get why you'd go to this new skyline or car site that ns has tried to do....man all the history, tech info is here!!!

doesnt make sence...just money making....ah well!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/214009-nscom-haxored/#findComment-3779429
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • Block bump. $400. As above cyl 6 needs bore or sleeve.
    • I would think making the argument that the travel is limited by a spring flexing against a spring perch as "the same method". Later on in the document they do state that the spring can't bind on full bump travel and cannot come loose in full rebound travel as well. (which is all very sensible). The laws are actually pretty sensible and reasonable. It's just that the people who enforce and check them don't actually read them or know them accurately. "Oh, coilovers? Instant fail mate. Don't even need to look at it." - Guy who will be instantly reported by me. There is probably merit to people who do get defected for height also get defected for the suspension in that state that allows it. I did never consider the people who are complaining about coilovers being picked on are also running around at 50mm off the floor.
    • I think given SAU's knowledge of E85 we can strongly conclude that 10% ethanol in almost any situation is entirely fine. Almost all of the myths against E85 were overblown, let alone E10.
    • From your link See bold text, is this referring to damper settings, if so that may a issue for "some" inspectors, I cannot see aftermarket coilovers having the evidence that "must be available that its functional performance is equivalent to the original" Maybe just remove the adjustment knows and hope for the best???? Meh 5.2 Suspension travel In all instances, modifications to a vehicle’s suspension must ensure the integrity of the system and not compromise the ride quality. At least two thirds of the original suspension travel should be maintained in both directions (rebound (i.e. extension) and bump (i.e. compression)), and rebound must be limited by the same method used by the vehicle manufacturer or if this is not practicable due to the nature of the modification, an equivalent method. If an alternative method is used, evidence must be available that its functional performance is equivalent to the original.
    • They actually don't - They adhere to VSB14 rules just like Victoria. The rules are against CABIN adjustable height, and it quite clearly states that the height has to be within parameters. I asked the VASS engineer to confirm this when I got my car engineered and they refused to engineer the coilovers because they didn't meet the requirements for requiring engineering. (mine are height adjustable.) People "Not wanting to bother" with "Actually reading/knowing/adhering to the rules" should result in fines and immediately losing the ability to issue blue slips and/or RWC's in Vic.
×
×
  • Create New...