Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i imported the car privately and took delivery of it mid-december...

purposely imported it near stock for the possibility of any future plans...

uni ended up being more expensive than i expected and with jana getting pregnant we had to advertise the car a bit heavier to fund for baby but unfortunately her cramps and pains ended up in a miscarriage but it was kind of okay because we were still fairly early into the pregnancy...

so i ended up not having to be as desperate as i initially was, i've had a few offers on the car since but they are all a few thousand dollars less than how much i'd let the car go for...

plans are as follows;

GT30 turbo

FMIC

Bosch 044

Injectors

Power FC

EBC - won't use MBC anymore because i will be getting workshop to do the work

BOV

i think that's it for now, had a few workshops get back to me... waiting on all their replies to see which one would be more 'bang for your buck' then i'll be visiting the bank

also cosmetically the plans are as followed;

CF bonnet (vented)

CF boot

CF GT-Wing

new bodykit of some sort

possibly new wheels (typical black 18'' with polished lip) - should have bought myself some before i bought a set for my girlfriend *shakes head*

Aero Mirrors

that's it for now...

i think then and maybe only then will i be 100% satisfied with my R34 but realistically the cosmetic side of it satisfies me to an extent, i really do desire more power and response though i really do

feel free to comment, would love to hear your opinions positive or negative, all welcome...

thanks

P.S: don't think i've forgotten about jana through this whole ordeal, we're organising to go skiing at perisher / thredbo and see a few eastern state cities while on my 7 week uni break and at the end of the year we're going to go for an asian pacific cruise (partially for her cousin's wedding)

we plan to travel every year as we went to singapore and phuket last year... great way to revitalise you're relationship :blink: though we had to find out the hard way :)

cheers, Andrew

  • 2 years later...
if there the CF bonnets with the big pop up vents in them, count me in! i was looking at one for $870... so $650, oh yeah count me in!!!

i've got one mate for 525 if you're looking for one still! 2nd hand excellent condition!

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Haggerty this is your red flag. In MAP based ECU's the Manifold pressure X RPM calculation is how the engine knows it is actually...running/going through ANY load. You are confusing the term 'base map' with your base VE/Fuel table. When most people say 'base map' they mean the stock entire tune shipped with the ECU, hopefully aimed at a specific car/setup to use as a base for beginning to tune your specific car. Haltech has a lot of documentation (or at least they used to, I expect it to be better now). Read it voraciously.
    • I saw you mention this earlier and it raised a red flag, but I couldn't believe it was real. Yes, the vacuum signal should vary. It is the one and only load signal from the engine to the ECU, and it MUST vary. It is either not connected or is badly f**ked up in some way.
    • @Haggerty you still haven't answered my question.  Many things you are saying do not make sense for someone who can tune, yet I would not expect someone who cannot tune to be playing with the things in the ECU that you are.  This process would be a lot quicker to figure out if we can remove user error from the equation. 
    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
×
×
  • Create New...