Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Guys,

I've never done up a car and I've never modified a car... but I'm dying to get into it! :newbie:

I buy several magazines and browse these forums and I'm really starting to see green at all the awesome rides out there.

I have a 1989 Celica SX (2.0L 3S-GE engine). It's a "White Lightning" edition and apparently there were only 150 brought into Australia.

The White Lightning has a few extras that the standard SX missed out on like leather steering wheel, sunroof, electric everything, sports seats, graphic EQ and best of all sexy white alloys :) !

It's in unbelievablse condition for it's age. The wheels have to go, but I'm more interested in performance (I'm not into rice).

Like I said, I'm totally new to modding cars, so where's a good place to start to get more out of my Celica?

I can post pics of my baby if anyone's interested. Hah.

Thanks for your help. :D

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/21427-bestow-your-wisdom-upon-me/
Share on other sites

Good call. Will do.

I only got it recently, and I haven't done anything to it.

I'm mainly focussing on performance. It's got bugger all touque down low, but starts to pick up at 4000rpm.

I want to start out with the basics, but where to start with limited funds?

Thanks for your reply 2fardown. Cheers.

First thing I would do with a NA car is get a quote on a 2 1/2" exhaust with extractors. Possibly an air filter upgrade - nice and cheap. From those two mods alone you will notice a nice increase in power. As far as anything else performance wise I'm not to sure...possibly cam/s?

Alot of money and work to get good power ups with an n/a.

If you were to double the hp you'd end up with car thats no fun on the street .....very cammy, unstable idle, nil power below 4000 and a screamer above 5500 + with a compression ratio of 10.5:1 or more you'd really need 100 octane fuel..................................on the other hand...if you were to supercharge your existing motor or engine swap to a suitable turbo it would be happiness all the way

2fardown - correct, I don't want a 10sec car (or even a 13 sec car)!

I'm after that feeling you get when you know the car's got more power/grunt/oomph in reserve just in case you need it.

At the moment, I know when I'm pushing it and I'm getting beaten by my G/F in her 1.6L Lancer!!!

Don't forget, the gt4 was 4wd. You can only have so much power going through a front wheel drive car. But I would go Extractors and 2 1/2" exaust. More agressive cams. Change the air filter, Cold air induction (won't help much, but it won't hurt either) See what chips and tuning is avaliable, but the results may be quite small. Some handling mods may be in order, like suspension.

But personally I wouldn't bother, and maybe just put a good stereo in, a Celica would be good for that sort of thing.

I would save the money for a faster car in the next coming years (AE86 :D, silvia, MR2, some honda coupe, these could be a possible upgrade.).

One of the toyota or celica forums I am sure could help you more, as they will have done this stuff in the past and know what gives the best results.

Greg.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You won't need to do that if your happy to learn to tune it yourself. You 100% do not need to do that. It is not part of the learning process. It's not like driving on track and 'finding the limit by stepping over the limit'. You should not ever accidently blow up an engine and you should have setup the ECU's engine protection to save you from yourself while you are learning anyway. Plenty of us have tuned their own cars, myself included. We still come here for advice/guidance/new ideas etc.  What have you been doing so far to learn how to tune?
    • Put the ECU's MAP line in your mouth. Blow as hard as you can. You should be able to see about 10 kPa, maybe 15 kPa positive pressure. Suck on it. You should be able to generate a decent vacuum to about the same level also. Note that this is only ~2 psi either way. If the MAP is reading -5 psi all the time, ignition on, engine running or not, driving around or not, then it is severely f**ked. Also, you SHOULD NOT BE DRIVING IT WITHOUT A LOAD REFERENCE. You will break the engine. Badly.
    • Could be correct. Meter might be that far out. Compare against a known 5 ohm 1% resistor.
    • @Murray_Calavera  If I were an expert I wouldn't be in here looking for assistance.  I am extremely computer literate, have above average understanding on how things should be working and how they should tie together.  If I need to go to a professional tuner so be it, but I'd much rather learn and do things myself even if it means looking for some guidance along the way and blowing up a few engines. @GTSBoy  I was hoping it would be as simple as a large vacuum leak somewhere but I'm unable to find anything, all lines seem to be well capped or going where they need to be, and when removed there is vacuum felt on the tube.  It would be odd for the Haltech built in MAP to be faulty, the GTT tune I imported had it enabled from the start, I incorrectly assumed it was reading a signal from the stock MAP, but that doesn't exist.  After running a vacuum hose to the ECU the signal doesn't change more than 0.2 in either direction.   I'll probably upload a video of my settings tomorrow, as it stands I'm able to daily drive, but getting stuttering when giving it gas from idle, so pulling away from lights is a slow process of revving it up and feathering the clutch until its moving, then it will accelerate fine.  It sounds like I need to get to the bottom of the manifold pressure issue, but the ignition timing section is most intimidating to me and will probably let a pro do that part.  Tomorrow I'll try a different vacuum line to T off of, with any luck I selected one that was already bypassed during the DBW swap.  (edit: I went out and did it right now, the line I had chosen did appear to have no vacuum on it, it used to go to the front of the intake, I've now completely blocked that one off at the bracket that holds several vacuum lines by the firewall.  I T'd into the vacuum line that goes from that bracket to the vacuum pump at the front of the car, but no change in the MAP readings).  Using the new vacuum line that has obvious vacuum on the hose, im still only getting readings between -6.0 and -5.2.  I'm wondering why the ECU was detecting -5.3 when nothing was connected to the MAP nipple and ECU MAP selected as the source. @feartherb26  I do have +T in the works but wanted to wait until Spring to start with that swap since this is my good winter AWD vehicle.  When removing the butterfly, did it leave a bunch of holes in the manifold that you needed to plug?  I thought about removing it but assumed it would be a mess.   I notice no difference when capping the vacuum line to it or letting it do its thing.  This whole thing has convinced me to just get a forward facing manifold when the time comes though.
    • Update: tested my spark plugs that are supposed to be 5ohms with a 10% deviation and one gave me a 0 ohms reading and the rest were 3.9ohm<, so one bad and the others on their way out.
×
×
  • Create New...