Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Max boost on stock r33 turbo is debatable, plenty of threads on sau. I think the limit is about 10-12psi?

It can take 14psi, but it's risky.

12psi is safer but on stock ECU will likely hit rich and retard (esp. on cold nights) and kill performance.

10psi i'd recommend because it's safe. The car will also rev out in any weather and is better for boost spike scenarios.

Remember even on 1 BAR boost the turbo will be fine. It's just excessive heat that kills the compressor turbine i.e. during track days/hot days.

  • Replies 76
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

yeh i don't think i wanna up the boost anymore...

The actuator is holding 10psi and just from a quick search the word seems to be anything more than that would be reaching the limits of things, but i dunno if the fuel controller and tune would help that side of things any?

And look as far as spending the rest of the money on savings or taking the wife out to dinner ect, i appreciate the advise but that stuff is already taken care of...Hence the small bugdet. So incase anyone else wants to offer that sort of suggestion, before you post keep in mind, this money is for the car only.

To all those people who are saying that it won’t make a difference I would like to ask what drugs you are smoking? Really...

First you have taken a Jap performance car which is meant to run on 100 octane fuel and stupid cold weather and brought it to Oz with 98 octane fuel and stupid hot weather, so the tune is already out because it’s meant for Japanese conditions

Then you modify the engines breathing ability by changing the intake, exhaust and intercooler to more free flowing items. Then for good measure you force more air into the engine via more boost.

So in effect you have an engine that’s breathing much more air and running on worse fuel then it was intended to run on. The standard ecu simply can’t cope with this, it was never designed to and just dumps fuel in as it doesn’t know how to react. An safc is by no means the best thing but it works perfectly fine to correct all this mess as that’s what it was intended to do, I am yet to see/hear of a car that has not made a substantial improvement to power/drivability/fuel economy from touching up the fuel maps using an safc.

For whoever insists on a front mount, get over the wank factor. The best intercooler is the smallest you can get away with for the power goal, in this case the r34 side mount intercooler is perfect as its small enough to keep good throttle response but big enough to support around 200rwkw. Going any more will simply hurt throttle response and increase lag slightly as the turbo would have to fill a greater space of air before that pressurized air gets to the engine.

In my opinion BDC70T is a front/dump pipe, 12psi and tune with safc away from a perfect budget street setup. With these mods it will be fast, smooth, responsive, and still reasonably good on fuel

The factory ECU will comfortably support 10psi. What logic is there in spending up to $800 ($300 SAFC, $500 tune) to run an extra 2psi?

Other then you missed the point entirely....

No, not to add more boost but to fix the air fuel mixtures. Sure the standard ecu will cope with 10 psi but it will cope with it by dumping fuel in to compensate for the increase in air flow through the engine. At the current price of fuel I would want the greatest efficiency possible. Being able to safely add 2psi is just a by product of the tuning which is always good, you dont have to add more boost if you dont want to. Who charges 500 for tune? 200 is max, wouldn't pay more then 500 complete for safc and the tune.

Other then you missed the point entirely....

No, not to add more boost but to fix the air fuel mixtures. Sure the standard ecu will cope with 10 psi but it will cope with it by dumping fuel in to compensate for the increase in air flow through the engine. At the current price of fuel I would want the greatest efficiency possible. Being able to safely add 2psi is just a by product of the tuning which is always good, you dont have to add more boost if you dont want to. Who charges 500 for tune? 200 is max, wouldn't pay more then 500 complete for safc and the tune.

I haven't missed anything :3some:

A friend of mine has a 200kw R33 with a tuned PFC and can't get more than 460km to a tank. I have a 190kw R33 with a factory ECU at 10psi that holds him in a straight line and gets 500km a tank. My engine is older and has much less spent on it.

I agree with your point on a general note. What i'm getting at is a good cost vs. performance compromise.

Too many variables to compare car to car. The biggie is driving style then as no two drivers are the same... PFC tuned open loop or closed? O2 sensor good or old/dodgy? dyno/day/all sorts. $500 on safc is well worth it, it will clean up the fuel mixtures and give a very noticeably nicer driving car all round. It is by no means neccessary but its as good as can be had for the budget available.

Must say here that this is ofcouse all assuming that there is no problems with the car anywhere that need to be fixed.

Edited by bnr#@

Mate I am actually in the same boat as you except I have an R34 GTT - currently has cat-back (came free with car) and boost controller ($30) running 10-12psi. I also want to spend minimal money - My plan is:

Dump pipe - $199

Hi Flow cat - $160 (you already have this)

FMIC - $300 (not really needed but hey I like the look).

SAFC NEO - $250 (brand new delivered, buy from the USA dont get ripped off here)

Tuning for above - $100-200.

Thats $1100 for me or $649 for you (as you have cat, R32 wastegate (10psi) and dont need FMIC). Personally I think SAFC is a wise investment, these cars run sooo rich with exhaust...I get 350km to a tank driving normally, everything is serviced/new, which leaves the air/fuel tune.

I only have one rule when modifying and thats make sure everything you buy can be taken off and sold seperatly when you sell the car, i.e. KEEP ALL YOUR STOCK PARTS. End advice.

Edited by colossus
tell us more bout the exhaust cam. haven't considered it b4 and im curious. $125 inc labour? or does that come under tuning?

retarding the exh-cam on non-neo engines broadens the power band. Neo's appear not to benifit.

Typically on a factory ecu you will not require a tune to gain some benifit, except to ensure the timing is set correctly. It does have an effect on AFR's however that mean tuning will give more benifit again.

The process is to bung it on. Get the S-AFC or similar and then get the tune done. The 4 deg setting will not require alteration in this config as there are plenty of examples that have resulted in the consensus around the degrees to set it.

On the other posts so far a few comments;

* A word on the JJR dump pipes; From my own experience they are crappy, typically you need to take to them with a die grinder to fix the careless welding and alignment of flanges.

* As mentioned the FMIC at this stage isn't required. You may like to go a bigger turbo in the future of course but, decide on the intercooler once you are certain of the rest of the setup. Down the track you may change your mind. You may start off thinking hiflow and street but,may end up T88 and drag.

* 10psi is as much as you need to be running on the turbo.Although the factory ecu copes with that but, an adjustment to fuel mixtures is going to capture the greatest benifit.

* 1 bar is a sure way to end the turbo life as it corresponds to increased turbine shaft speed and load once the airflow increases. Like a few people I have been a member of this forum since it started and the "1 bar is safe" idea is well and truely shot to peices based on the history of wrecked factory turbos. Remember that ceramic dust can get into the motor when the turbine fails so you lose more than just the turbo if you are unlucky.

I think you have some good ammo to go start buying parts now. Happy hunting :D

how bout gettn a FMIC and help that catback of yours breath a bit better with front/dump pipes.

50kw gain i rkn

my favourite part of this thread.... 50kw gain from FMIC and combined dump & front pipe.

but seriously, i'd go for the combined dump & front pipe to finish off your exhaust $249 s/s from justjap

$22 manual boost controller (forced induction thread)

Bass Junky silicone inlet pipe(bout $100 i think)

I've got a safc,but now that remaps are so readily availible,id suggest you see Toshi for 1.

cant remember but you might want a new fuel pump.

this exh cam gear sounds like a goer.

retarding the exh-cam on non-neo engines broadens the power band. Neo's appear not to benifit.

Typically on a factory ecu you will not require a tune to gain some benifit, except to ensure the timing is set correctly. It does have an effect on AFR's however that mean tuning will give more benifit again.

The process is to bung it on. Get the S-AFC or similar and then get the tune done. The 4 deg setting will not require alteration in this config as there are plenty of examples that have resulted in the consensus around the degrees to set it.

cheers for that. its raised a lot more questions (ie: new camshaft or adj camgear or can this be done on a stock setup). search time methinks

Bass Junky silicone inlet pipe(bout $100 i think)

this exh cam gear sounds like a goer.

that is also a good idea. its a bitch to install tho. japs have small hands :blink:. theres a few ppl selling the pipes on here.

Mate just to show some real world results for you.

When i bought my r33 it had cat back 3 inch kakimoto exh apexi pod walbro fuel pump that setup achieved 145 rwkw.

I added

r34 smic

hi flow 4 inch magnaflow cat

jjr split dump

safc2

retuned with turbo set at 10 psi acheived 171 rwkw and so much nicer to drive

one thing that all rb motors are going to need at one stage or another is a overhauled ignition system, wheather you go for replacement direct fire, or go for a wasted spark system, this is just as good as putting a free flow exhaust manifold.

you notice the difference.

you'll have money left over to buy a programable rom for your ecu.

Start a savings account at 10% and lock it for 6 months, constantly wack in about 20 - 50 bux a week get it out and you can buy some nice mods.

If you want a SAFC ill have one for sale soon, a neo..

Wack in a electronic (or a gfb one if on a budget) boost it up to 11psi daily and you'll have more power. for now your be fine cause its winter but best to get a FMIC before spring.

And the safc as well.. that what I basically run and its great.

Edited by DECIM8
one thing that all rb motors are going to need at one stage or another is a overhauled ignition system, wheather you go for replacement direct fire, or go for a wasted spark system, this is just as good as putting a free flow exhaust manifold.

you notice the difference.

you'll have money left over to buy a programable rom for your ecu.

Although it's true that as these cars are getting old, there is no point replacing coild and things till it's showing signs of being rooted.

The stock setup is mint. certainly good enough to punt you well past 350rwkw, the factory coils are as good as you get when working. There is absolutely no benifit in terms of power if the exsisting stock system is healthy.

Slightly off topic, just got a query about the Toshi remap.

Is a Nistune ROM and remap essentially the same thing?

Hyperdrive in W.A say they can remap it and tune it for $800.

Is that reasonable?

Also, i have heard that remaps are better then a SAFC and tune, but i have nothing to base that on.....

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • Next on the to-do list was an oil and filter change. Nothing exciting to add here except the oil filter is in a really stupid place (facing the engine mount/subframe/steering rack). GReddy do a relocation kit which puts it towards the gearbox, I would have preferred towards the front but there's obviously a lot more stuff there. Something I'll have to look at for the next service perhaps. First time using Valvoline oil, although I can't see it being any different to most other brands Nice... The oil filter location... At least the subframe wont rust any time soon I picked up a genuine fuel filter, this is part of the fuel pump assembly inside the fuel tank. Access can be found underneath the rear seat, you'll see this triangular cover Remove the 3x plastic 10mm nuts and lift the cover up, pushing the rubber grommet through The yellow fuel line clips push out in opposite directions, remove these completely. The two moulded fuel lines can now pull upwards to disconnect, along with the wire electrical plug. There's 8x 8mm bolts that secure the black retaining ring. The fuel pump assembly is now ready to lift out. Be mindful of the fuel hose on the side, the hose clamp on mine was catching the hose preventing it from lifting up The fuel pump/filter has an upper and lower section held on by 4 pressure clips. These did take a little bit of force, it sounded like the plastic tabs were going to break but they didn't (don't worry!) The lower section helps mount the fuel pump, there's a circular rubber gasket/grommet/seal thing on the bottom where the sock is. Undo the hose clip on the short fuel hose on the side to disconnect it from the 3 way distribution pipe to be able to lift the upper half away. Don't forget to unplug the fuel pump too! There's a few rubber O rings that will need transferring to the new filter housing, I show these in the video at the bottom of this write up. Reassembly is the reverse Here's a photo of the new filter installed, you'll be able to see where the tabs are more clearing against the yellow OEM plastic Once the assembly is re-installed, I turned the engine over a few times to help build up fuel pressure. I did panic when the car stopped turning over but I could hear the fuel pump making a noise. It eventually started and has been fine since. Found my 'lucky' coin underneath the rear seat too The Youtube video can be seen here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uLJ65pmQt44&t=6s
    • It was picked up on the MOT/Inspection that the offside front wheel bearing had excessive play along with the ball joint. It made sense to do both sides so I sourced a pair of spare IS200 hubs to do the swap. Unfortunately I don't have any photos of the strip down but here's a quick run down. On the back of the hub is a large circular dust cover, using a flat head screw driver and a mallet I prised it off. Underneath will reveal a 32mm hub nut (impact gun recommended). With the hub nut removed the ABS ring can be removed (I ended up using a magnetic pick up tool to help). Next up is to remove the stub axle, this was a little trickier due to limited tools. I tried a 3 leg puller but the gap between the hub and stub axle wasn't enough for the legs to get in and under. Next option was a lump hammer and someone pulling the stub axle at the same time. After a few heavy hits it released. The lower bearing race had seized itself onto the stub axle, which was fine because I was replacing them anyway. With the upper bearing race removed and the grease cleaned off they looked like this The left one looked pristine inside but gave us the most trouble. The right one had some surface rust but came apart in a single hit, figure that out?! I got a local garage to press the new wheel bearings in, reassemble was the opposite and didn't take long at all. Removing the hub itself was simple. Starting with removing the brake caliper, 2x 14mm bolts for the caliper slider and 2x 19mm? for the carrier > hub bolts. I used a cable tie to secure the caliper to the upper arm so it was out of the way, there's a 10mm bolt securing the ABS sensor on. With the brake disc removed from the hub next are the three castle nuts for the upper and lower ball joints and track rod end. Two of these had their own R clip and one split pin. A few hits with the hammer and they're released (I left the castle nuts on by a couple of turns), the track rod ends gave me the most grief and I may have nipped the boots (oops). Fitting is the reversal and is very quick and easy to do. The lower ball joints are held onto the hub by 2x 17mm bolts. The castle nut did increase in socket size to 22mm from memory (this may vary from supplier) The two front tyres weren't in great condition, so I had those replaced with some budget tyres for the time being. I'll be replacing the wheels and tyres in the future, this was to get me on the road without the worry of the police hassling me.
    • Yep, the closest base tune available was for the GTT, I went with that and made all the logical changes I could find to convert it to Naturally Aspirated. It will rev fine in Neutral to redline but it will be cutting nearly 50% fuel the whole way.  If I let it tune the fuel map to start with that much less fuel it wont run right and has a hard time applying corrections.  These 50% cuts are with a fuel map already about half of what the GTT tune had.  I was having a whole lot of bogging when applying any throttle but seem to have fixed that for no load situations with very aggressive transient throttle settings. I made the corrections to my injectors with data I found for them online, FBCJC100 flowing 306cc.  I'll have to look to see if I can find the Cam section. I have the Bosch 4.9 from Haltech. My manifold pressure when watching it live is always in -5.9 psi/inHg
    • Hi My Tokico BM50 Brake master cylinder has a leak from the hole between the two outlets (M10x1) for brake pipes, I have attached a photo. Can anyone tell me what that hole is and what has failed to allow brake fluid to escape from it, I have looked on line and asked questions on UK forums but can not find the answer, if anyone can enlighten me I would be most grateful.
    • It will be a software setting. I don't believe many on here ever used AEM. And they're now a discontinued product,that's really hard to find any easy answers on. If it were Link or Haltech, someone would be able to just send you a ECU file though.
×
×
  • Create New...