Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

^^ fixed. There you go grammar Nazi :( I didn't notice that one, but you'd be surprised how many spelling and grammar mistakes I make in thread titles. :)

  • Replies 66
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Alright chumps you've quoted me then made statements completely unrelated to what i said. Lets begin

"A GTR 32 does the 1/4 in 13 flat". I don't ever remember saying that they didn't so what are you on about?

And here is the most clever of them all.

"trucks have like 700hp but i don't see 1 of them beating a skyline either"

I never said the power is what determines how fast a car is down the quarter. I said i doubt a SKYLINE with 167 kw would be quicker than the new SS over the quarter mile.

Please think before posting.

i only said it because you seemed to be giving sly-dn sh*t about his car when all he was saying was don't bother racing falcodores

167kw atw is pretty much what gtr's have standard so i wouldnt be so sure his car couldnt teach a ss a lesson

anyways this has nothing to do with the thread so ill leave it at that.

the problem is on these threads there's no tone of voice and people often percieve a agro comment when it was really just someone posting up their thoughts which are being taken way further than they had intended

sorry trying to sound inteligent and add to what sled said but i can't come up with 1 of his bus ticket/thought of the day like statements :) ill go watch some dr phil and come back

Edited by gzilla
i only said it because you seemed to be giving sly-dn sh*t about his car when all he was saying was don't bother racing falcodores

167kw atw is pretty much what gtr's have standard so i wouldnt be so sure his car couldnt teach a ss a lesson

anyways this has nothing to do with the thread so ill leave it at that.

the problem is on these threads there's no tone of voice and people often percieve a agro comment when it was really just someone posting up their thoughts which are being taken way further than they had intended

sorry trying to sound inteligent and add to what sled said but i can't come up with 1 of his bus ticket/thought of the day like statements :) ill go watch some dr phil and come back

very true, well said

We can be very sincere in what we sometimes say but be sincerely wrong at the same time.

Perception is 9/10 of how people receive us.

Sorry to whore this thread with philosophical crap.

Thats why I hate the forums sometimes. You can be debating a topic, but everyone else thinks you're fighting over it ... not necessarily the case.

I had an interesting 'debate' with SK not long ago, but got alot of "he is god" and "he knows his stuff" etc. I never really disagreed with him, I just wanted it explained thoroughly (I do have good mechanical knowledge) and written documentation on the topic is all.

I'm sure SK does know his shit, but I've not met the guy or dealt with him and the recommendations are just hearsay, until I do met/deal with him. Until then, I'm sure as hell going to pick the shit out of technical stuff, so I can develop a good knowledge of it. It all starts somewhere.

:)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • That's probably OK. That's a face to face compression joint between two surfaces with the clamping load provided by those bolts. So.... it's unlikely that the bolts will end up feeling that load in shear, unless the clamping surfaces are not large enough, bolts not got enough tension on them, etc etc to prevent the two faces from moving wrt each other. Which... I would hope the designers have considered, seeing as it's probably one of the most important things the upright has to do apart from resist collapsing in its own right. But yes, it would definitely be worth asking them what their safety factor on that part of the design was. I tend to think that the casting, being a casting, is not necessarily the strongest bit of material in the world. It's about an inch square, and when you think about the loads that are being put into it, you have to wonder what safety factor the Nissan boys (and every other OEM engineer who has designed all the millions of other uprights that look essentially the same) used to account for defective casting, aging, severe impacts on the wheel, etc etc. 
    • Those bolts would be orders of magnitude stronger that cast aluminium though.  And its mainly clamping force, not shear they are dealing with?
    • Except all that twisting force that is breaking a cast piece, appears to be going through 4 bolts in the picture Johnny posted of the BryPar one...
    • The smart approach is to use the gearbox loom from the manual car. Makes it a lot easier - just plugs into the switches on the box and plugs into the main loom up near the fusebox. Then you only need to deal with bypassing the inhibit switch. The other approach requires you to use the wiring diagram to identify those wires by colour and location, perhaps even indulging in a little multimeter action to trace them end to end to make sure, and then.... you will have the answers you need. The R34 wiring diagram is available on-line (no, I do not have a link to it myself - I would have to do a search if I wasn't able to go to the copy I have at home).
    • Hi, i’m converted my r34 4dr auto to manual but need help with gearbox wiring. There are bunch of wires no idea which one for speedo drive, neutral, reverse can anyone help me. IMG_6860.mov
×
×
  • Create New...